CVE-2026-69542
massHeap Buffer Overflow in Windows Camera Frame Server Monitor Allows Local Privesc
CVE-2026-69542 is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the Windows Camera Frame Server Monitor component of Microsoft Windows. A local attacker who already holds authorized, low-privileged access to a system can trigger the overflow via the Camera Frame Server Monitor service, with no user interaction required per the CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N). Successful exploitation lets the attacker elevate privileges locally, with CVSS-flagged high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the host. Any Windows installation running the Camera Frame Server Monitor component is potentially affected, although the available data does not enumerate specific affected version ranges. There is currently no public proof-of-concept, the flaw is not in CISA's KEV, and EPSS estimates only a 0.2% probability of exploitation within 30 days (16th percentile), indicating no known exploitation.
What to do: Apply the Microsoft fix for CVE-2026-69542 via Windows Update as soon as your patch cycle allows, confirming applicability against Microsoft's advisory since exact affected versions were not included in the source data. Prioritize shared and multi-user systems such as kiosks, RDP/jump hosts, and workstations where untrusted or low-privileged users log on locally, because exploitation requires local access. Given no known exploitation and low EPSS, standard-cycle patching is defensible, but track this flaw as a likely candidate for chaining with other local or remotely exploited Windows bugs.
| Microsoft Windows (Camera Frame Server Monitor component) | — |
Order-of-magnitude estimate by the model from install counts, market share and public scan data it knows; verify before quoting.
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Camera Frame Server Monitor allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
- Weakness
- CWE-122
- Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
In the news0 stories
No ingested article mentions this CVE yet.