CVE-2026-85031
moderateRemote buffer overflow in TOTOLINK CP450 4.1.0 web interface
TOTOLINK CP450 routers running firmware 4.1.0 contain a buffer overflow (CWE-119/CWE-120) in an unspecified function of the web management endpoint /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. An attacker triggers the flaw by manipulating the topicurl argument sent to this endpoint over the network, and the CVSS 4.0 vector (PR:L) indicates some level of privileged/authenticated access is likely required. Successful exploitation causes memory corruption with high impact on the router's confidentiality, integrity and availability, potentially enabling code execution or a crash of the device. Only TOTOLINK CP450 devices on version 4.1.0 are known to be affected. There is currently no public proof-of-concept, no reported in-the-wild exploitation, and the device is not in CISA KEV; EPSS estimates only a ~0.6% chance of exploitation within 30 days.
What to do: Inventory for TOTOLINK CP450 devices running firmware 4.1.0 and check TOTOLINK's official site for a patched firmware release; do not expose the router's web management interface (cstecgi.cgi) directly to the internet, and restrict it to trusted management networks until a fix is available. Continue monitoring TOTOLINK advisories, since no public PoC exists yet but flaws of this type in TOTOLINK web endpoints have historically been rapidly weaponized.
| TOTOLINK CP450 | 4.1.0 |
Order-of-magnitude estimate by the model from install counts, market share and public scan data it knows; verify before quoting.
A vulnerability was found in TOTOLINK CP450 4.1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument topicurl results in buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible.
- Weakness
- CWE-119, CWE-120
- Vector
- CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
In the news0 stories
No ingested article mentions this CVE yet.