Vulnerabilities
13 CVEs · NVD, GitHub Advisories, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, GitHub PoC repos
| CVE | Vulnerability | CVSS | EPSS | Flags | Affected | Exposure | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-12944 | SSRF-Driven Root Code Execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0–1.10.0 IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allow a low-privileged attacker to submit workflow components containing socket or urllib imports, which the server executes as arbitrary Python code with root privileges (UID=0) inside the Langflow container. The built-in validation scanner incorrectly returns 'validated': true for these malicious components, giving operators a false sense that submitted flows are safe. Successful exploitation enables AWS credential theft via IMDSv1 SSRF using the instance's full IAM role permissions, arbitrary file exfiltration from the container filesystem, and lateral movement to internal services such as PostgreSQL and Redis on the Docker network. Anyone running a self-hosted Langflow server in the affected range that permits untrusted or semi-trusted users to build and submit flows is affected. The flaw is rated critical (CVSS 9.6), but no public proof-of-concept, known in-the-wild exploitation, or CISA KEV listing exists at this time. Do: Upgrade IBM Langflow OSS to a version newer than 1.10.0 as soon as IBM releases a fix, and check the IBM PSIRT advisory for the patched build. Do not rely on the component validator's 'validated': true signal — treat all user-submitted components as untrusted and restrict who can create or import flows. Harden the environment by running the container as a non-root user, enforcing IMDSv2 (disable IMDSv1) on cloud hosts, segmenting the Docker network from databases like PostgreSQL/Redis, and rotating AWS credentials and other secrets if untrusted flows were ever executed. | 9.6 | <1% | PoC |
| moderate≈ low thousands of internet-exposed Langflow instances, plus an unknown larger number of internal/self-hosted deployments | |
| CVE-2026-76461 | Unauthenticated SQL Injection to Root RCE in Cisco Secure Email Gateway Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway contains a SQL injection flaw (CWE-89) in its email parsing logic, caused by insufficient validation of message content. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can trigger it simply by sending a crafted email containing malicious SQL statements through an affected gateway, with no user interaction required. Successful exploitation allows arbitrary SQL execution that escalates to arbitrary operating-system command execution with root privileges, fully compromising the appliance and all mail flowing through it. Any organization running an affected version of Cisco Secure Email Gateway is impacted, and because these appliances sit on the inbound mail path they are inherently reachable over the network. There is no known public proof-of-concept, the flaw is not on the CISA KEV list, and no in-the-wild exploitation has been reported to date, though the CVSS 9.8 rating makes patching urgent. Do: Upgrade to the fixed AsyncOS release listed in the corresponding Cisco PSIRT advisory as soon as possible, since the flaw is unauthenticated, requires no user interaction, and yields root. Until patched, apply any Cisco-documented workarounds and tightly restrict which hosts can submit mail to the gateway where operationally feasible. Review mail and system logs on these appliances for anomalies such as SQL errors in parsing, unexpected processes, or unexplained outbound connections that could indicate exploitation attempts. | 9.8 | 2% | KEV PoC ×2 |
| large≈ tens of thousands of gateway deployments (order of 10,000–50,000 appliances) | |
| CVE-2026-78006 | Unauthenticated RCE in The Events Calendar WordPress Plugin The Events Calendar WordPress plugin is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution (CWE-502, unsafe deserialization) in all versions up to and including 6.17.4 via the is_safe_widget_instance function, whose protection can be bypassed because PHP fires magic methods during pre-parse while enable_rendering_widget_copied() forges a valid wp_hash integrity attribute before unserialize() is reached. The flaw is reachable without authentication or approval because the plugin's V2 single-event template runs do_blocks() over buffered comment HTML, and WordPress returns a moderation-hash URL that lets an unauthenticated commenter immediately view their own still-pending comment, delivering attacker-injected block markup to the vulnerable code path before moderation occurs. Successful exploitation gives an unauthenticated attacker arbitrary code execution on the web server with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Any site running a vulnerable version is affected, but only when comments are enabled and visible on events. No public proof-of-concept is known, the issue is not in CISA's KEV catalog, and no in-the-wild exploitation has been confirmed. Do: Update The Events Calendar to the latest available release (any version newer than 6.17.4) as soon as possible. Until patched, disable comments on events or prevent them from being publicly visible, since exploitation requires comments to be enabled and viewable on event pages. Review logs for pending comments submitted to events and unexpected widget/serialized data, and treat comment moderation queues on event posts with suspicion. | 9.8 | <1% | PoC ×2 |
| mass≈200,000+ sites (plugin reports 200,000+ active installs on WordPress.org), with the exploitable subset smaller because comments must be enabled and visible on… | |
| CVE-2026-85706 | Unauthenticated Path Traversal Arbitrary File Read in GitLab CE/EE CVE-2026-85706 is a path traversal flaw (CWE-35) in GitLab Community Edition and Enterprise Edition in which the repository commits API does not properly confine file paths and does not enforce authentication, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to read arbitrary files from the GitLab server. It is triggered by sending a crafted unauthenticated request to the commits API that supplies traversal sequences moving outside the intended repository path. An attacker gains the ability to read arbitrary files on the host, which can expose configuration files, certificates, and stored credentials or keys; related reporting on the recent GitLab patch wave also notes credential theft and code execution flaws, though this CVE itself is the file-read issue. All self-managed GitLab CE and EE deployments are in scope, and CISA did not publish specific affected version ranges in this data. The flaw was added to CISA's KEV catalog on 2026-09-11 and is being actively probed and exploited in the wild within a day of disclosure, with three public proof-of-concept repositories available; ransomware use is not yet confirmed. Do: Upgrade GitLab CE/EE to the patched release identified in GitLab's security advisory (no specific fixed version number is provided in this data), prioritizing internet-facing instances in line with CISA BOD 26-04; if patching is not immediately possible, restrict exposure and review access logs for unauthenticated requests to the commits API containing path traversal sequences. Because arbitrary file read can expose server-side secrets, inventory and rotate credentials, tokens, and keys stored on or reachable by affected GitLab hosts. | 10.0 | 12% | KEV PoC ×9 |
| massLikely >1,000,000 aggregate users across hundreds of thousands of self-managed CE/EE deployments, with tens of thousands of instances directly exposed to the… | |
| CVE-2026-88899 | Path Traversal in knowns /api/opencode Proxy Endpoint (CVE-2026-88899) knowns versions before 0.31.0 contain a path traversal flaw (CWE-73, External Control of File Name or Path) in the /api/opencode proxy endpoint, which fails to validate the x-opencode-directory request header. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted header containing arbitrary directory paths, causing the endpoint to perform file operations outside the intended project root on the host system. Depending on the permissions of the service process, this can allow reading, writing, or otherwise manipulating files anywhere on the host, which the critical 9.3 CVSS 4.0 score reflects with high ratings for confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Anyone running an affected version of knowns with the opencode proxy endpoint reachable over the network is affected. There are currently no reports of in-the-wild exploitation, no known public proof-of-concept, and the issue is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Do: Upgrade to knowns 0.31.0 or later, where the x-opencode-directory header is properly validated. If upgrading is not immediately possible, restrict network access to the /api/opencode endpoint (e.g., via reverse proxy rules), strip or validate the x-opencode-directory header, and run the service with least-privilege filesystem permissions. Administrators should also review host file integrity on exposed instances for signs of unexpected modifications. | 9.3 | <1% | PoC |
| nichelikely on the order of hundreds to low thousands of self-hosted instances (estimate; no public install counts available) | |
| CVE-2026-77770 | Unauthenticated Arbitrary Option Deletion in miniOrange 2FA for WordPress The miniOrange 2FA WordPress plugin deletes site options whose names are taken directly from unauthenticated request input without first validating a transaction, a missing-authorization flaw (CWE-862). Any unauthenticated visitor can therefore send a crafted request that deletes arbitrary WordPress options on a vulnerable site. By deleting key options, an attacker can lock every administrator out of the dashboard or deactivate the miniOrange 2FA plugin(s) on the site, defeating two-factor enforcement; this is reflected in the critical CVSS 3.1 score of 10.0 with scope-changed, high integrity and availability impact. All WordPress sites running an affected version — before 6.3.1 or before 19.3 depending on the distribution's version line — are affected. There is no known public proof-of-concept, the flaw is not in CISA KEV, and no in-the-wild exploitation has been reported. Do: Update the miniOrange 2FA plugin urgently: install version 6.3.1 or later (or version 19.3 or later on the other distribution's version line, per the branch you run). Because the flaw is exploitable by any unauthenticated visitor and can fully lock administrators out, if you cannot patch immediately consider temporarily deactivating the plugin or blocking unauthenticated requests that trigger option deletion at your WAF. After patching, verify that two-factor enforcement is active and that important site options (including administrator and 2FA settings) were not deleted. | 10.0 | <1% | PoC |
| largeon the order of tens of thousands of WordPress sites (≈30k–40k active installs reported for miniOrange's WordPress 2FA plugin) | |
| CVE-2026-18351 | Unauthenticated File Upload RCE in Drag and Drop File Upload for Elementor Forms CVE-2026-18351 is an unauthenticated arbitrary file upload flaw in the Drag and Drop File Upload for Elementor Forms WordPress plugin, present in all versions up to and including 1.6.0. The is_file_type_valid() function accepts the attacker-controlled 'type' parameter as regex keys in the MIME allowlist, so an attacker can bypass the extension blacklist by uploading a file whose extension, after sanitize_file_name() normalization, resolves to a PHP extension. Because uploads reach the elementor_file_upload function with no authentication or user interaction required, an unauthenticated remote attacker can upload executable PHP files and achieve remote code execution on the server (CVSS 3.1: 9.8 critical). Any WordPress site running the plugin at version 1.6.0 or earlier is affected, particularly sites where the WordPress uploads directory is web-accessible and PHP execution is not blocked. As of this writing, there is no known public proof-of-concept, the issue is not in the CISA KEV catalog, and no in-the-wild exploitation has been confirmed. Do: Update the Drag and Drop File Upload for Elementor Forms plugin to the latest patched release (any version newer than 1.6.0) as soon as it is available. Until then, inspect the uploads directory for unexpected or recently created PHP files, consider temporarily deactivating the plugin, and enforce a WAF rule or server configuration that blocks PHP execution in the uploads directory. Continue monitoring for a public proof-of-concept, since the technical details (unauthenticated file upload to RCE) make opportunistic mass scanning likely once exploited code appears. | 9.8 | <1% | PoC ×2 |
| — | |
| CVE-2026-67401 | Authenticated SQL Injection in cPanel EmailTrack Leads to Root RCE CVE-2026-67401 is a critical SQL injection (CWE-89) in the EmailTrack component of cPanel, the widely used hosting control panel. An attacker holding any mail-enabled account on the server can reach the vulnerable component over the network with low privileges and no user interaction (CVSS: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N), and the injection crosses a privilege boundary (Scope: Changed) to achieve remote code execution as root. Successful exploitation yields full compromise of the host — arbitrary commands as root with complete access to all hosted data — so every site, mailbox and account on an affected server is exposed. All cPanel deployments with mail enabled are potentially affected; the available data does not specify exact vulnerable version ranges, which are provided in WebPros security advisory AV26-908. Exploitation has not been confirmed in the wild (not in CISA KEV), but two public proof-of-concept exploits are already on GitHub, making near-term exploitation likely. Do: Upgrade cPanel to the patched release identified in WebPros advisory AV26-908 (exact fixed version numbers are not given in the available data), prioritizing internet-facing servers that host mail-enabled accounts. Until patched, restrict access to the EmailTrack component and audit mail-enabled accounts and logs for suspicious database queries or unexpected root-level processes, since public PoC exploits are already available. | 9.9 | <1% | PoC ×3 |
| masstens of millions of hosted accounts across hundreds of thousands of cPanel servers | |
| CVE-2026-87528 | Type Confusion in Google Chrome on Windows Enables Out-of-Sandbox Code Execution CVE-2026-87528 is a type confusion flaw (CWE-843) in Rust-based code in Google Chrome on Windows. A remote attacker can trigger it by persuading a user to open a crafted HTML page, causing incorrect type handling in memory. Successful exploitation potentially allows execution of arbitrary code outside the browser sandbox, meaning an attacker's code would run beyond Chrome's renderer-level containment. Users running Google Chrome on Windows prior to 153.0.8010.36 are affected; no other products or platforms are named in the advisory. No in-the-wild exploitation is currently known: the flaw is not in CISA's KEV, EPSS assigns a 0.2% 30-day exploitation probability, and while the CVSS base score is 9.6 (critical), the Chromium project itself rates the issue Medium; one public reference (Chromium issue 539569491) exists. Do: Update Google Chrome on Windows to 153.0.8010.36 or later, verifying the installed version at chrome://settings/help or chrome://version. No workaround that prevents the type confusion is documented, so prioritize patching, especially for users who browse untrusted web content; note the vendor severity is Medium but the flaw can yield code execution outside the sandbox. Technical details may emerge at Chromium issue 539569491, worth monitoring for indicators or exploit development. | 9.6 | <1% | PoC |
| masshundreds of millions of Windows Chrome users (Chrome's overall installed base exceeds 3 billion) | |
| CVE-2026-86060 | Argument-Injection Flaw in MikroTik RouterOS SSH Login Enables Privilege Escalation CVE-2026-86060 is an argument-injection flaw (CWE-88) in MikroTik RouterOS's SSH login path: when a login supplies a username beginning with a prohibited character, the RouterOS login helper mishandles the argument, allowing the trusted RouterOS policy mask to be changed and privileges to be escalated. An unauthenticated attacker only needs the ability to reach the router's SSH service, since exploitation happens during the SSH login process itself. By altering the policy mask the attacker gains elevated rights on the device, and news reports indicate attackers have used this technique — including logins with usernames such as '-2' — as part of chains that take over routers without needing a password. Any RouterOS deployment running versions before the fixes (6.49.21 Long-term, 7.23.4 Long-term, 7.24.2 Stable) with SSH enabled or reachable is affected, with internet-exposed SSH at highest risk. Multiple outlets report the RouterOS flaws are being actively exploited in the wild, although no public proof-of-concept is known and the flaw is not yet in CISA KEV. Do: Upgrade RouterOS to 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) or 7.24.2 (Stable) as applicable. Until patched, restrict SSH (TCP 22) to trusted management networks or disable the SSH service if unused, and review authentication logs and user/group policy settings for tampering — reports indicate attackers log in with usernames beginning with '-' (e.g., '-2'). | 9.2 | 1% | KEV PoC ×2 |
| mass≈1M+ devices: hundreds of thousands to over a million RouterOS devices are routinely observed internet-exposed, and far more expose SSH to the LAN | |
| CVE-2026-19490 | Remote Authentication Bypass in Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway contain an authentication-bypass vulnerability (CWE-288, 'using an alternate path or channel') that an unauthenticated remote threat actor can exploit. The flaw is triggerable when the appliance is configured as an AAA virtual server or as a Gateway, including SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, or RDP Proxy deployments, allowing the attacker to bypass authentication without valid credentials. A successful bypass could give an attacker access to VPN-protected or AAA-gated resources as an authenticated user; no CVSS score has been published yet. Organizations running affected NetScaler appliances in these configurations are exposed, and affected version ranges are not specified in the available data, so defenders should consult Citrix advisory AL26-019. The flaw was added to CISA's KEV on 2026-09-09, indicating exploitation in the wild; ransomware use is unknown, no public PoC is known, and EPSS assigns a 3.4% probability of exploitation within 30 days (88th percentile). Do: Prioritize applying vendor fixes or mitigations per Citrix advisory AL26-019 in line with CISA BOD 26-04, focusing first on internet-facing appliances configured as AAA virtual servers or Gateways (SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy). Until patched, restrict internet exposure and review VPN/AAA authentication logs for signs of unauthenticated access, following CISA's Forensics Triage Requirements if compromise is suspected. | 9.3 | 6% | KEV PoC |
| largeon the order of 10,000-100,000 internet-exposed NetScaler ADC/Gateway appliances | |
| CVE-2026-20079 | Authentication bypass to root access in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center CVE-2026-20079 is an authentication bypass (CWE-288) in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, caused by an improper system process created at boot time. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit it by sending crafted HTTP requests to the FMC web interface, which allows the execution of script files and commands on the device. A successful exploit grants the attacker root access to the underlying operating system, giving full control of the management platform (CVSS 3.1: 10.0, network-exploitable, no privileges or user interaction required, scope changed). The flaw affects Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management deployments. Cisco has confirmed the vulnerability is being exploited in active attacks, it carries a 35.9% EPSS score (98th percentile), and CISA added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2026-09-09. Do: Upgrade FMC (and SCC Firewall Management tenants) to the fixed release specified in Cisco's advisory, prioritizing internet-exposed or externally reachable management interfaces; CISA KEV action applies to federal agencies under BOD 26-04. Until patching, restrict FMC web interface access to trusted management networks and VPNs and check devices for signs of exploitation such as unexpected script execution, unfamiliar processes, or root-level changes. Triage per CISA's Forensics Triage Requirements if compromise is suspected. | 10.0 | 76% | KEV PoC ×2 |
| largeplausibly tens of thousands of FMC deployments worldwide (internet-exposed instances likely a smaller subset, likely thousands) | |
| CVE-2025-25249 | Heap-Based Buffer Overflow in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiSwitchManager, and FortiSASE CVE-2025-25249 is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122/CWE-787) in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiSwitchManager, and FortiSASE that allows an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands. It is triggered by sending specially crafted packets to an affected device, causing an out-of-bounds write in heap memory that can be leveraged for code execution. Successful exploitation gives attackers command execution on the appliance; in observed intrusions against FortiGate firewalls, attackers have deployed custom Node.js malware and a post-exploitation RAT dubbed PivotC2. Any organization running the affected Fortinet products is at risk, with internet-facing FortiGate firewalls the primary concern. The flaw was added to CISA's KEV on 2026-09-09, confirming active exploitation in the wild (ransomware use unknown); no public PoC is known. Do: Upgrade FortiOS, FortiSwitchManager, and FortiSASE in accordance with Fortinet's advisory (specific fixed versions are not listed in the available data), prioritizing internet-exposed FortiGate firewalls per CISA KEV and BOD 26-04 timelines. Hunt for signs of compromise, including custom Node.js malware and the PivotC2 RAT, on FortiGate devices, and review exposure and access logs for admin/SSL-VPN interfaces. If patching is not possible, apply vendor-recommended mitigations or, per BOD 26-04, discontinue use of the exposed product. | 9.8 | 2% | KEV PoC |
| mass≈300,000–500,000 internet-exposed FortiGate/FortiOS devices (plus FortiSASE cloud tenants) |