ZeroHour

Vulnerabilities

6 CVEs · NVD, GitHub Advisories, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS, GitHub PoC repos

CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSFlagsAffectedExposurePublished
CVE-2024-25176
+2 in the same advisory: …25178 …25177
LuaJIT through 2.1 and OpenRusty luajit2 before v2.1-20240626 have a stack-buffer-overflow in lj_strfmt_wfnum in lj_strfmt_num.c.

LuaJIT through 2.1 and OpenRusty luajit2 before v2.1-20240626 have a stack-buffer-overflow in lj_strfmt_wfnum in lj_strfmt_num.c.

NVD description · AI analysis pending
9.8
group max
<1% PoC
  • luajit luajit
CVE-2020-24372
LuaJIT through 2.1.0-beta3 has an out-of-bounds read in lj_err_run in lj_err.c.

LuaJIT through 2.1.0-beta3 has an out-of-bounds read in lj_err_run in lj_err.c.

NVD description · AI analysis pending
7.51% PoC
  • luajit luajit
CVE-2020-15890
LuaJit through 2.1.0-beta3 has an out-of-bounds read because __gc handler frame traversal is mishandled.

LuaJit through 2.1.0-beta3 has an out-of-bounds read because __gc handler frame traversal is mishandled.

NVD description · AI analysis pending
7.53% PoC
  • luajit luajit
  • luajit debian linux
  • luajit ubuntu linux
CVE-2019-19391
In LuaJIT through 2.0.5, as used in Moonjit before 2.1.2 and other products, debug.getinfo has a type confusion issue that leads to arbitrary memory write or re

In LuaJIT through 2.0.5, as used in Moonjit before 2.1.2 and other products, debug.getinfo has a type confusion issue that leads to arbitrary memory write or read operations, because certain cases involving valid stack levels and > options are mishandled. NOTE: The LuaJIT project owner states that the debug libary is unsafe by definition and that this is not a vulnerability. When LuaJIT was originally developed, the expectation was that the entire debug library had no security guarantees and thus it made no sense to assign CVEs. However, not all users of later LuaJIT derivatives share this perspective

NVD description · AI analysis pending
9.11%
  • luajit luajit
  • luajit moonjit