Vulnerabilities

Cross Site scripting vulnerability (XSS) in NetBox 4.3.5 "comment" field on object forms. An attacker can inject arbitrary HTML, which will be rendered in the web UI when viewed by other users. This could potentially lead to user interface redress attacks or be escalated to XSS in certain contexts.

netbox-docker before 2.5.0 has a superuser account with default credentials (admin password for the admin account, and 0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567 value for SUPERUSER_API_TOKEN). In practice on the public Internet, almost all users changed the password but only about 90% changed the token. Having a default token value was intentional and was valuable for the main intended use case of the netbox-docker product (isolated development networks). Some users engaged in an effort to repurpose netbox-docker for production. The documentation for this effort stated that the defaults must not be used. However, installation did not ensure non-default values. The Supplier was aware of the CVE ID assignment and did not object to the assignment.

NetBox is an open-source infrastructure resource modeling and IP address management platform. A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in versions 2.11.0 through 3.7.x in the ProtectedError handling logic, where object names are included in HTML error messages without proper escaping. This allows user-controlled content to be rendered in the web interface when a delete operation fails due to protected relationships, potentially enabling execution of arbitrary client-side code in the context of a privileged user.

Netbox Community v4.1.7 and fixed in v.4.2.2 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the RSS feed widget.

Netbox Community 4.1.7 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the maintenance banner` in maintenance mode.

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in NetBox 4.1.0 within the "Configuration History" feature of the "Admin" panel via a /core/config-revisions/ Add action. An authenticated user can inject arbitrary JavaScript or HTML into the "Top banner" field. NOTE: Multiple third parties have disputed this as not a vulnerability. It is argued that the configuration revision banner feature is meant to contain unsanitized HTML in order to display notifications to users. Since these fields are intended to display unsanitized HTML, this is working as intended.

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in netbox v4.0.3 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the circuit ID parameter at /circuits/circuits/add.

** DISPUTED ** A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in NetBox up to 3.7.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /core/config-revisions of the component Home Page Configuration. The manipulation with the input >test leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-252191. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Netbox 3.5.1, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via Name field in device-roles/add function.

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Netbox v3.4.7 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the Custom Link templates.

Netbox 3.5.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in the "Create Wireless LAN Groups" function.

A vulnerability in Netbox v3.5.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute queries against the GraphQL database, granting them access to sensitive data stored in the database. NOTE: the vendor disputes this because the reporter's only query was for the schema of the API, which is public; queries for database objects would have been denied.

NetBox through 2.6.2 allows an Authenticated User to conduct an XSS attack against an admin via a GFM-rendered field, as demonstrated by /dcim/sites/add/ comments.