ZeroHour
Organization

Nous Research

0 mentions in 7 days · 3 in 30 days · 3 total · first seen · last

Timeline

Nous Research Adds One-Click Local Model Setup to Hermes Desktop

Nous Research's Hermes Desktop now offers one-click local model setup that reads hardware, picks a fitting quantization, downloads weights, and configures llama.cpp automatically.

Hermes Desktop, the MIT-licensed build of the open-source Hermes Agent, now sets up local models in one click: it reads the machine's hardware, selects a model that fits, downloads weights, and configures the inference runtime. It manages a pinned llama.cpp build with CUDA, Metal, Vulkan, HIP, and CPU backends, and shows green/amber/red memory-fit verdicts per catalog model before download. Quantization floors at 4-bit, and recommended models guarantee at least a 64K context window protected by ordered RAM offload (expert weights first, never the attention cache). It runs on macOS 12+, Windows 10/11, and Linux with no account required for local models.

MarkTechPost · 10d agoAI tools & infra

AI Coding Agents Are Installing Unknown/Untrusted Code on Corporate Networks

Researchers found 120 corporate llms.txt files pointing to unregistered packages, demonstrating AI coding agents install and execute attacker-controlled code on Fortune 500 networks.

Researchers at an Israeli stealth startup scanned 6,214 live domains belonging to defense contractors, Fortune 500 and Big Tech companies, finding 120 llms.txt files that pointed to unregistered code packages or domain names. After registering a handful of the unclaimed names, they received a phone-home beacon within an hour from a Fortune 500 company and dozens more over time. Parent-process chains showed coding agents including Claude, OpenAI's Codex and Nous Research's Hermes executed the installed packages. The researchers warn agents treating vendor docs as ground truth creates a SolarWinds-style supply-chain surface as agent adoption spreads across SaaS, cloud and endpoints.

Schneier on Security · 11d agoAI safety & security in the wild1

Malicious .git Configs Can Make Claude, Codex, Cursor, and Other AI Agents Run Attacker Code

Malicious .git core.fsmonitor configs let attacker code run in AI coding agents like Claude Code and Codex; four of eight flaws remain unpatched.

Manifold Security disclosed eight flaws across seven command-line AI coding agents where a repository's Git core.fsmonitor configuration causes agent-spawned commands to execute attacker code outside the sandbox and without approval prompts. Fixes shipped for goose (CVE-2026-72718, CVSS 4.0 score 7.0), Claude Code on one path, and Cursor, while Hermes Agent, Qwen Code, Grok Build, and a second Claude Code path were still unpatched as of September 1. OpenAI issued three CVEs for the same class in Codex, including CVE-2026-19592, and prior related bugs include CVE-2021-43891 in Visual Studio Code and CVE-2022-24346 in JetBrains IDEs. Exploitation requires the repository to arrive with its .git directory intact, such as via archives, shared drives, or USB sticks rather than an ordinary clone.

Related CVEs

  • Command injection RCE in Hermes Agent via malicious .git/config
    Hermes Agent versions 0.18.2 through 0.21.0 contain an OS command injection flaw (CWE-78) in which the agent's git operations honor the core.fsmonitor setting in a repository's .git/config, letting that setting specify an attacker-controlled command. The attack is triggered when a user opens a crafted repository and sends any message, at which point the agent runs a git status index refresh that executes the injected command in the user's process context. A successful attacker gains arbitrary OS command execution with access to the user's full environment, including configured AI provider API keys, which can be exfiltrated. Anyone running an affected Hermes Agent version who opens untrusted or attacker-supplied repositories is exposed; the attack requires user interaction but no privileges or authentication on the target. No public proof-of-concept, KEV listing, or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation is currently known, and EPSS estimates roughly a 0.9% probability of exploitation within 30 days.
    · Hermes Agent 0.18.2 through 0.21.0 (fixed in commit f6234d0)
  • In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2021.3.1, local code execution via RLO (Right-to-Left Override) characters was possible.
    In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2021.3.1, local code execution via RLO (Right-to-Left Override) characters was possible.
    · jetbrains intellij idea
  • Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
    Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
    · microsoft visual studio code
  • Claude Code is an agentic coding tool.
    Claude Code is an agentic coding tool. From 2.1.38 until 2.1.163, Claude Code's worktree handling allowed creation of worktrees named ".git" and navigation to worktrees outside the sandbox context, enabling git directory confusion attacks. By exploiting symlink manipulation and git fsmonitor execution during worktree operations, an attacker could overwrite files in the user's home directory (such as .zshenv), leading to code execution outside of seatbelt sandbox restrictions. Reliably exploiting this required the user to clone a malicious repository containing prompt injection content and run…
    · anthropic claude code
  • Unsandboxed attacker code execution in OpenAI Codex via malicious Git core.fsmonitor
    OpenAI Codex CLI and Codex Desktop automatically collect Git repository metadata without disabling the repository-local core.fsmonitor setting, so Git can execute the filesystem-monitor helper named in a repository's .git/config while Codex gathers that metadata. The flaw is triggered when a user opens or works in a repository prepared by an attacker and delivered with its .git/config intact, such as a copied folder or archive, because an ordinary Git clone does not preserve the source repository's local config. The attacker-supplied helper runs outside Codex's command sandbox and without any user-approval prompt, giving the attacker code execution with the user's privileges, including the ability to read, modify, or delete the user's files and access other resources available to that account. Anyone running Codex CLI on Windows, macOS, or Linux or Codex Desktop on Windows or macOS who opens untrusted repositories is exposed, and related reporting indicates the same malicious .git/config pattern also affects other AI coding agents such as Claude and Cursor, although this CVE is scoped to Codex. No exploitation is currently known: there is no public proof-of-concept, EPSS is a low 0.1%, the issue is not in CISA KEV, and it was disclosed through Pwn2Own as ZDI-26-650.
    · OpenAI Codex CLI (Windows, macOS, and Linux) · OpenAI Codex Desktop (Windows and macOS)large
  • goose is general-purpose AI agent that runs on your machine.
    goose is general-purpose AI agent that runs on your machine. Prior to 1.44.0, the `goose review` command runs the system `git` executable to gather the diff for review without stripping attacker-controlled Git configuration. A malicious repository whose `.git/config` sets [`core] fsmonitor = ` causes Git to execute that command on the host during the index refresh performed by `git diff HEAD`. The command runs before goose contacts a model and without a submitted prompt, model call, tool approval, or trust prompt. The context-gathering Git process is not sandboxed and is outside goose's…

Appears with

Entities are extracted by the model from each article. Watching an entity keeps it in this browser only (no account); the watchlist page and dashboard alerts use it.