ZeroHour
Schneier on Securitypublished ()ingested Bruce Schneier

Flok License Plate Surveillance

lowPolicy & legalimportance 30
Full article179 words · extracted from schneier.com · click to collapse

The company Flok is surveilling us as we drive:

A retired veteran named Lee Schmidt wanted to know how often Norfolk, Virginia’s 176 Flock Safety automated license-plate-reader cameras were tracking him. The answer, according to a U.S. District Court lawsuit filed in September, was more than four times a day, or 526 times from mid-February to early July. No, there’s no warrant out for Schmidt’s arrest, nor is there a warrant for Schmidt’s co-plaintiff, Crystal Arrington, whom the system tagged 849 times in roughly the same period.

You might think this sounds like it violates the Fourth Amendment, which protects American citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures without probable cause. Well, so does the American Civil Liberties Union. Norfolk, Virginia Judge Jamilah LeCruise also agrees, and in 2024 she ruled that plate-reader data obtained without a search warrant couldn’t be used against a defendant in a robbery case.

Tags: cameras, cars, courts, privacy, surveillance, tracking

Posted on October 8, 2025 at 12:10 PM33 Comments

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2025/10/flok-license-plate-surveillance.html