ZeroHour
Cisco Talospublished ()ingested

Ongoing exploitation of Cisco Catalyst SD

Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →

CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSFlagsAffectedExposurePublished
CVE-2026-20122
Arbitrary File Overwrite via Privileged APIs in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager (the platform formerly known as vManage) contains an incorrect use of privileged APIs flaw (CWE-648) stemming from improper file handling on its API interface. An attacker exploits it by uploading a malicious file through the API interface onto the local file system of an affected system. A successful exploit allows the attacker to overwrite arbitrary files on the system and gain vmanage user privileges, which typically means administrative control of the SD-WAN management plane. Any organization running Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, whether on-premises appliances or virtual instances managing an SD-WAN overlay or instances hosted in Cisco's cloud, is potentially affected; CISA has not published affected version ranges or a CVSS score, and the flaw was disclosed alongside other Cisco product vulnerabilities. The vulnerability was added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2026-04-20, indicating exploitation in the wild, EPSS estimates a 24.6% probability of exploitation within 30 days (98th percentile), no public proof-of-concept is known, and ransomware use is unknown.

Do: Follow CISA's Emergency Directive 26-03 and the Hunt & Hardening Guidance for Cisco SD-WAN Devices to identify exposed SD-WAN Manager instances and hunt for signs of exploitation, and prioritize applying the fixed releases cited in Cisco's advisory once version ranges are published. Until patched, restrict and monitor access to the SD-WAN Manager API interface; organizations using Cisco's cloud-hosted SD-WAN service should adhere to the applicable BOD 22-01 cloud guidance or discontinue use if mitigations are unavailable.

5.425% KEV
  • Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager
large≈ tens of thousands of deployed SD-WAN Manager (vManage) management nodes worldwide
CVE-2026-20127
Authentication Bypass in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, Manager, Validator

A flaw in the peering authentication mechanism of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller (formerly vSmart), Manager (formerly vManage), and Validator (formerly vBond) allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication by sending crafted requests to an affected system. A successful exploit grants the attacker access as an internal, high-privileged, non-root user on the SD-WAN Controller, from which they can reach NETCONF and manipulate the network configuration of the entire SD-WAN fabric. Any organization operating these Cisco SD-WAN control-plane components is affected, and the critical CVSS 10.0 score reflects full network scope with no privileges or user interaction required. The flaw is confirmed exploited in the wild: CISA added it to the KEV on 2026-02-25, Cisco has confirmed active exploitation (including a compromise of a communications service provider), and Five Eyes allies have issued an active-exploitation warning, with EPSS at 88.2% (100th percentile).

Do: Upgrade affected Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, Manager, and Validator components per Cisco's PSIRT advisory (fixed versions are not specified in this data), and prioritize patching given confirmed in-the-wild exploitation. Follow CISA Emergency Directive 26-03 and the CISA Hunt & Hardening Guidance for Cisco SD-WAN Devices: hunt for compromise indicators such as unexpected high-privileged non-root logins and unauthorized NETCONF configuration changes, and restrict internet exposure of SD-WAN management interfaces. Where mitigations are unavailable, adhere to applicable BOD 22-01 cloud guidance or discontinue use of the product.

10.088% KEV
  • Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller (formerly SD-WAN vSmart)
  • Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager (formerly SD-WAN vManage)
  • Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Validator (formerly SD-WAN vBond Orchestrator)
large≈10,000–100,000 controller/manager/validator deployments across enterprise and service-provider SD-WAN fabrics (Cisco SD-WAN is a market-leading enterprise…
CVE-2026-20133
+1 in the same advisory: …20128
Actively Exploited Information Disclosure in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, the central management and monitoring platform for Cisco SD-WAN fabrics (formerly known as vManage), contains a sensitive-information-exposure flaw (CWE-200) that allows remote attackers to view sensitive information on affected systems. The available data does not specify the exact trigger path or authentication requirements, but the flaw is remotely exploitable by unauthorized actors. An attacker gains access to sensitive information held on the management platform, which aggregates inventory, configuration, and telemetry for an entire SD-WAN overlay, potentially aiding follow-on attacks. Any organization running an affected release of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager is in scope. CISA added the vulnerability to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2026-04-20, confirming exploitation in the wild, and EPSS assigns a 31.4% probability of exploitation within 30 days (98th percentile), although CVSS scoring is pending and no public proof-of-concept is known.

Do: Inventory your environment for internet-exposed Catalyst SD-WAN Manager instances and review access logs for signs of unauthorized retrieval of sensitive information, since the flaw is listed as exploited in the wild. Apply the vendor fix referenced in Cisco's advisory for CVE-2026-20133 when available, and follow CISA's Emergency Directive 26-03 and the CISA 'Hunt & Hardening Guidance for Cisco SD-WAN Devices'; federal agencies must adhere to applicable BOD 22-01 mitigation timelines or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

7.531% KEV
  • Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager
large≈tens of thousands of deployments (Cisco has publicly cited 30,000+ SD-WAN customers, each operating at least one Manager controller)
CVE-2026-20182
Authentication Bypass in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Control Components

CVE-2026-20182 is a critical authentication flaw (CWE-287) in the control-connection peering authentication of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller (formerly vSmart), Manager (formerly vManage), and Validator (formerly vBond). Because the peering authentication mechanism does not work properly, an unauthenticated, remote attacker can send crafted requests during the control-connection handshake and log in to the controller as an internal, high-privileged, non-root user without valid credentials. With this access, the attacker can reach NETCONF and manipulate network configuration across the entire SD-WAN fabric. Any organization running these Catalyst SD-WAN control components is affected, and the flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 10.0 and a 91.5% EPSS score. CISA added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2026-05-14, confirming exploitation in the wild, amid a series of exploited Cisco SD-WAN zero-days including a compromise at a communications service provider.

Do: Upgrade affected Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, Manager, and Validator components to the fixed releases identified in Cisco's May 2026 advisory (version numbers are not provided in this data). Use the advisory's 'show control connections' guidance to inspect control-connection handshaking for anomalies and audit for unauthorized high-privileged non-root accounts and unexpected NETCONF sessions. Operators — especially federal agencies — should follow CISA Emergency Directive 26-03 and CISA's Hunt & Hardening Guidance for Cisco SD-WAN Devices, including restricting internet exposure of SD-WAN management interfaces until patched.

10.092% KEV
  • Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller (formerly SD-WAN vSmart)
  • Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager (formerly SD-WAN vManage)
  • Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Validator / vBond Orchestrator (formerly SD-WAN vBond)
largeon the order of tens of thousands of affected control-plane systems (controllers, managers, validators) across enterprise, service-provider, and government…

Indicators of compromiseAll →

TypeIndicatorContext
domain1a820b09-95ba-44eb-b350-417e8241b725-00-1lgwuuen9b77p.worf.replitCluster 8 - Download URL for the Nim-based backdoor hxxps://1a820b09-95ba-44eb-b350-417e8241b725-00-1lgwuuen9b77p[.]worf[.]replit.dev/download Cluster 8 - Attacker controlled sub-domain
domaina820b09-95ba-44eb-b350-417e8241b725-00-1lgwuuen9b77p.worf.replittacker controlled sub-domain hosting the Nim-based backdoor a820b09-95ba-44eb-b350-417e8241b725-00-1lgwuuen9b77p[.]worf[.]replit.dev Cluster 8 - Attacker IP that downloaded the Nim-bas
domainconfig.jsonation file remote location hxxp://83[.]229[.]126[.]195:8081/config[.]json Cluster 8 - Nim-based backdoor 0c87871642f84e09e8d3fb23ec
domaindefunct.datconnect to by reading and Base58 decoding the accompanying “defunct[.]dat” file. The C2 peer ID is: 78 c4 a2 37 56 27 7b b7 de 20 0
domainreplit.devaded and executed post-compromise from the remote location “replit[.]dev”: Figure 6. Download and startup script for the Nim-based
md5fece5b954e69b2c6a8d0a1029631a0d7ong with a Mythic C2 server certificate with serial number: fece5b954e69b2c6a8d0a1029631a0d7 Another AdaptixC2 server on port 31337 An open SSH service
sha25602654acfb21f83485393ba8b14bd8862b919b9ec966fc6768f6aac1338a45ee8- AdaptixC2 C2 IP 194[.]163[.]175[.]135 Cluster 6 - Sliver 02654acfb21f83485393ba8b14bd8862b919b9ec966fc6768f6aac1338a45ee8 Cluster 6 - Sliver C2 over mTLS mtls[://]23.27.143[.]170:44
sha2560c87871642f84e09e8d3fb23ec36bf55601323e31151a7017a85dbec929cf15d126[.]195:8081/config[.]json Cluster 8 - Nim-based backdoor 0c87871642f84e09e8d3fb23ec36bf55601323e31151a7017a85dbec929cf15d Cluster 8 - Download URL for the Nim-based backdoor hxxps:/
sha2560ed72d52347bfe4a78afff8a6982a64050c8fc86d8957a20eeb3e0f3f5342ed0r C2 IP 23.27.143[.]170 Cluster 7 - XMRig downloader script 0ed72d52347bfe4a78afff8a6982a64050c8fc86d8957a20eeb3e0f3f5342ed0 Cluster 7 - XMRig sample 96fc528ca5e7d1c2b3add5e31b8797cb12
sha25617302d903baf182f94dc3be40ab1e0874dd0eb2ec5255bf9131fd53591efe9250ce97de3eaaffef33d90b0c337a153fc9690cc34ee207b557d868360060 17302d903baf182f94dc3be40ab1e0874dd0eb2ec5255bf9131fd53591efe925
sha25618d77c9c5bbb5b9d5bdfd366fdfcf26bad9e64c63ca865fad711bcce8e3d5a80ckdoor 13[.]62[.]52[.]206 Cluster 8 - KScan – scanning tool 18d77c9c5bbb5b9d5bdfd366fdfcf26bad9e64c63ca865fad711bcce8e3d5a80 Cluster 8 - IP related to Nim-based backdoor and KScan 176[
sha2565bc5998161056b7c8f70c9724d8a63abc7ff8c3843b91c30cffab0899e39b7f8bdcc9a29e06e5b41d9be567bcfa Cluster 9 - gsocket secret file 5bc5998161056b7c8f70c9724d8a63abc7ff8c3843b91c30cffab0899e39b7f8 47[.]104[.]248[.]7 b0f51b098842cd630097b462aab0ec357e2c7824
sha25672f570ce97de3eaaffef33d90b0c337a153fc9690cc34ee207b557d868360060cca6d08165265da2c2d3 Cluster 10 - Check for root escalation 72f570ce97de3eaaffef33d90b0c337a153fc9690cc34ee207b557d868360060 17302d903baf182f94dc3be40ab1e0874dd0eb2ec5255bf9131fd53591e
sha2567aa88a64a527ade7d93c20faf23b54f2ee33ad9b1246cdc2f8ded2ab639affb104976c8fbeaecdbf0aa4309ad46 Cluster 7 - XMRig configuration 7aa88a64a527ade7d93c20faf23b54f2ee33ad9b1246cdc2f8ded2ab639affb1 Cluster 7 - XMRig remote location IP 83[.]229[.]126[.]195 C
sha25696fc528ca5e7d1c2b3add5e31b8797cb126f704976c8fbeaecdbf0aa4309ad464050c8fc86d8957a20eeb3e0f3f5342ed0 Cluster 7 - XMRig sample 96fc528ca5e7d1c2b3add5e31b8797cb126f704976c8fbeaecdbf0aa4309ad46 Cluster 7 - XMRig configuration 7aa88a64a527ade7d93c20faf23
sha256b0f51b098842cd630097b462aab0ec357e2c7824af37cca6d08165265da2c2d34d8a63abc7ff8c3843b91c30cffab0899e39b7f8 47[.]104[.]248[.]7 b0f51b098842cd630097b462aab0ec357e2c7824af37cca6d08165265da2c2d3 Cluster 10 - Check for root escalation 72f570ce97de3eaaffef
sha256d94f75a70b5cabaf786ac57177ed841732e62bdcc9a29e06e5b41d9be567bcfabackdoor and KScan 176[.]65[.]139[.]31 Cluster 9 - gsocket d94f75a70b5cabaf786ac57177ed841732e62bdcc9a29e06e5b41d9be567bcfa Cluster 9 - gsocket secret file 5bc5998161056b7c8f70c9724d8
sha256f6f8e0d790645395188fc521039385b7c4f42fa8b426fd035f489f6cda9b5da1]134 104.233.156[.]1 194.233.100[.]40 Cluster 5 - AdaptixC2 f6f8e0d790645395188fc521039385b7c4f42fa8b426fd035f489f6cda9b5da1 Cluster 5 - AdaptixC2 C2 server 194[.]163[.]175[.]135:4445
urlhttp://13[be used by the agent to communicate with the C2 hosted on “hxxp://13[.]62[.]52[.]206:5004”. This tool was downloaded and executed
urlhttp://83[cation IP 83[.]229[.]126[.]195 Cluster 7 - XMRig remote URL hxxp://83[.]229[.]126[.]195:8081/xmrig Cluster 7 - XMRig configuration
urlhttps://1a820b09-95ba-44eb-b350-417e8241b725-00-1lgwuuen9b77p[29cf15d Cluster 8 - Download URL for the Nim-based backdoor hxxps://1a820b09-95ba-44eb-b350-417e8241b725-00-1lgwuuen9b77p[.]worf[.]replit.dev/download Cluster 8 - Attacker controlled
Full article2,035 words · extracted from blog.talosintelligence.com · click to collapse

Thursday, May 14, 2026 12:02

  • Cisco Talos is tracking the active exploitation of CVE-2026-20182, an authentication bypass vulnerability in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, formerly SD-WAN vSmart, and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage.
  • Successful exploitation of CVE-2026-20182 allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and obtain administrative privileges on an affected system.
  • The exploitation of CVE-2026-20182 appears to have been limited so far and Talos clusters this activity under UAT-8616 with high confidence.
  • Talos is also aware of a series of threat actors, distinct from UAT-8616, that have been observed to be exploiting a different, previously disclosed set of vulnerabilities, in a new way than previously identified, beginning March 2026 - specifically CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20128 and CVE-2026-20122. It is important to note that those vulnerabilities are distinct from and pre-date CVE-2026-20182. Cisco released software updates and a security advisory addressing those vulnerabilities in February 2026, strongly recommending customers to upgrade.
  • We have identified multiple clusters of post-compromise activity, beginning March 2026, associated with the exploitation of CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20128 and CVE-2026-20122 that deployed webshells and other malicious tooling, described in this post.
  • We observed the vast majority of this exploitation involved the use of ZeroZenX labs’ proof-of-concept and accompanying JSP-based webshell which we track as “XenShell.”

UAT-8616 in-the-wild (ITW) exploitation of CVE-2026-20182

Talos is aware of the active, in-the-wild (ITW) exploitation of CVE-2026-20182 in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager, that allows log in to the affected system as an internal, high-privileged, non-root user account. Talos clusters the exploitation of this vulnerability and subsequent post-compromise activity under UAT-8616, whom we assess is a highly sophisticated cyber threat actor. UAT-8616 previously exploited a similar vulnerability in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, CVE-2026-20127 to gain unauthorized access to SD-WAN systems.

UAT-8616 performed similar post-compromise actions after successfully exploiting CVE-2026-20182, as was observed in the exploitation of CVE-2026-20127 by the same threat actor. UAT-8616 attempted to add SSH keys, modify NETCONF configurations, and escalate to root privileges. Our findings indicate that the infrastructure used by UAT-8616 to carry out exploitation and post-compromise activities also overlaps with the Operational Relay Box (ORB) networks that Talos monitors closely.

Customers are strongly advised to follow the guidance and recommendations published in Cisco's Security Advisory on CVE-2026-20182. Customer support is also available by initiating a TAC request.  Please refer to the Recommendations and Detection Guidance section for additional coverage information. We also recommend referring to Rapid7’s disclosure on CVE-2026-20182 for additional details.

In-the-wild (ITW) exploitation of CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20122, and CVE-2026-20128

Talos is also aware of the widespread in-the-wild active exploitation of three vulnerabilities in unpatched Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager infrastructure (CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20128, and CVE-2026-20122) that, when chained together, can allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to gain access to the device. Cisco released software updates and a security advisory addressing these vulnerabilities in February 2026. Following the public release of proof-of-concept code exploiting these vulnerabilities by ZeroZenX Labs in March, we observed the exploitation of the unpatched systems from March to April 2026.

Talos has observed several other threat clusters, separate from UAT-8616, leveraging publicly available proof-of-concept exploit code to deploy webshells to affected systems. Following successful exploitation, the webshells would allow the attacker to execute bash commands on the affected system.

The vast majority of observed exploitation attempts involved the use of the ZeroZenX Labs proof-of-concept code and accompanying JavaServer Pages (JSP) shell, which we are calling “XenShell.” However, we observed several other JSP-based webshell variants, which are outlined below.

Note: The CVE referenced in the ZeroZenX Labs proof-of-concept is incorrectly attributed to CVE-2026-20127. Talos’ analysis indicates that the targeted CVEs in the proof-of-concept are in-fact CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20128 and CVE-2026-20122.

So far, Talos has observed the following clusters of malicious activity being conducted post successful exploitation of CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20122, and CVE-2026-20128: Cluster #1 to Cluster #10.

Cluster 1

This cluster has been actively exploiting CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20128 and CVE-2026-20122 since at least March 6, 2026. Following the exploitation of these CVEs, the threat actor deployed a variant of the Godzilla web shell under the filename “20251117022131.jsp”. This variant is associated with a publicly available GitHub project.

The following IPs were used to carry out the exploit and subsequently interact with the shell:

  • 38.181.52[.]89
  • 89.125.244[.]33
  • 89.125.244[.]51
Figure 1. Tas9er Godzilla shellcode deployed in Cluster #1.

Cluster 2

This cluster has been actively exploiting CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20128, and CVE-2026-20122 since at least March 10, 2026. Following their exploitation, the threat actor deployed a variant of the Behinder webshell under the filename “conf.jsp”. This variant has been modified to only use Base64 for encoding, as opposed to AES encryption commonly observed in other variants.

The IP “71.80.85[.]135” was used to carry out the exploit and interact with the shell.

Figure 2. Behinder webshell deployed in Cluster #2.

Cluster 3

This cluster has been actively exploiting CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20128, and CVE-2026-20122 since at least March 4, 2026. Following successful exploitation, the threat actor deployed XenShell under the name “sysv.jsp”, before returning hours later to deploy a variant of the Behinder webshell under the filename “sysinit.jsp”.

The IP “212.83.162[.]37” was used to carry out the exploit and interact with the shell.

Figure 3. Behinder webshell deployed in Cluster #3.

Cluster 4

This cluster has been actively exploiting CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20128 and CVE-2026-20122 since at least March 3, 2026. Following successful exploitation, the threat actor deployed a variant of the Godzilla webshell under the filename “vmurnp_ikp.jsp”.

The following IPs are attributed to this cluster:

  • 38.60.214[.]92
  • 65.20.67[.]134
  • 104.233.156[.]1
  • 194.233.100[.]40
Figure 4. Godzilla webshell deployed in Cluster #4.

Cluster 5

Talos observed the deployment, beginning March 13, 2026, of a malware agent compiled off the publicly available AdaptixC2 red team framework. The filename was “systemd-resolved” and the agent’s command and control (C2) is “194[.]163[.]175[.]135:4445”.

The authors have changed the default TCP banner for the sample from “AdapticC2 server” to “shadowcore”. Hosted on Contabo GmbH, this is likely a VPS. As of March 28, 2026, this C2 IP, “194[.]163[.]175[.]135” hosted:

  • A Mythic C2 server on port 7443, along with a Mythic C2 server certificate with serial number: fece5b954e69b2c6a8d0a1029631a0d7
  • Another AdaptixC2 server on port 31337
  • An open SSH service on port 22, likely for administration of server

Cluster 6

In another cluster of activity, since at least March 5, 2026, Sliver, an open-source adversarial emulation framework (aka red-teaming implant), was deployed with the filename “CWan”. The Sliver sample’s C2 is “mtls://23.27.143[.]170:443”.

Cluster 7

In this cluster of activity, since at least March 25, 2026, an XMRig sample and its accompanying configuration file were downloaded and deployed via a shell script from the remote location “83.229.126[.]195”.

Figure 5. Download and startup script for XMRig.

This IP, residing in Hong Kong, is also a known C2 server for Cobalt Strike.

Cluster 8

Activity observed in Cluster 8 began as early as March 10, 2026. This cluster consisted of a few key malicious tools. The first tool is KScan, an asset mapping tool, that can port scan, TCP fingerprint, capture banners for specified assets, and obtain as much port information as possible without sending more packets. It can perform automatic brute-force cracking and brute-force RDP. The tool’s filename and Go packages have been renamed to “QScan” by the authors, but it is essentially the same implementation as the open-source GitHub version.

The second tool, named “agent1”, is a Nim-based implant. It is most likely based on the open-source tools, Nimplant, but is further modified to include:

  • Additional commands/capabilities, such as cd to directories; cat files; download and upload files; execute files using bash; and collect system information such as username, hostname, hwid, process listings, etc.
  • C2 endpoints for communication, registration/check-ins, obtain tasks, provide results, and more:
    • /api/v1/handshake
    • /api/v1/results
    • /api/v1/payloads
    • /api/v1/exfiltrate
    • /api/v1/tasks
    • /api/v1/init
  • An RSA public key to be used by the agent to communicate with the C2 hosted on “hxxp://13[.]62[.]52[.]206:5004”.

This tool was downloaded and executed post-compromise from the remote location “replit[.]dev”:

Figure 6. Download and startup script for the Nim-based implant.

The attackers executed this command on the compromised system while connected from the source IP “79[.]135[.]105[.]208”. This is likely a ProtonVPN node.

Replit is an AI platform that facilitates building applications using AI. It is therefore likely that the backdoor was created with the help of AI to resemble Nimplant’s functionality with the additional capabilities and deviations listed above.

Cluster 9

In this cluster, since at least March 17, 2026, Talos observed the deployment of an XMRig miner and a peer-based proxying and tunneling tool.

This tool, gsocket, is a peer-based proxying and tunneling tool that allows peers to connect to each other within the Global Socket Relay Network (GSRN). GSRN allows peers to connect to each other using node IDs, which are unique 16-byte identifiers for nodes with the network.

This sample obtains the peer or C2 node to connect to by reading and Base58 decoding the accompanying “defunct[.]dat” file. The C2 peer ID is:

78 c4 a2 37 56 27 7b b7 de 20 06 76 34 d2 63 c9  

The tool is activated by placing a malicious command in the .profile file:

This decodes to:

XMRig Miner

Accompanying gsocket was a Monero miner and its scripts and configuration files. The miner is also activated via the user profile (.profile):

/tmp/moneroocean/miner.sh --config=/tmp/moneroocean/config_background.json >/dev/null 2>&1

The “miner.sh” will find all processes named XMRig, kill them, and then start its own copy of XMRig:

Cluster 10

This cluster of activity, since at least Mar 13, 2026, consisted of a credential stealer deployed along with accompanying scripts. The main script, named “loot_run.sh”, attempted to obtain:

  • The admin user’s hashdump
  • JSON Web Tokens (JWT) key chunks that are used for REST API authentication
  • AWS credentials for vManage: AccesKeyId, SecretAccessKey and Token

Two other helper scripts were also deployed in this cluster to check if the current user could escalate to root. The scripts contained a hardcoded password and used it to execute the command su root –c id. The output is checked for the string “uid=0(root)” to verify successful escalation.

Recommendations and detection guidance

Customers are strongly advised to follow the guidance and recommendations published in Cisco's Security Advisory on CVE-2026-20182. Customer support is also available by initiating a TAC request. Talos strongly recommends that customers and partners using Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN technology follow the steps outlined in this advisory to help protect their environments. We also recommend referring to Rapid7’s disclosure on CVE-2026-20182 for additional details.

Snorts SIDs for CVE-2026-20182 are: 66482 - 66483

Please refer to the official Cisco Security Advisory on CVE-2026-20133, CVE-2026-20122, and CVE-202128 for the latest information regarding affected products, Indicators Of Compromise (IOCs), and mitigation steps.

Snort SIDs for CVE-2026-20133: 66468 - 66469

Snort SIDs for CVE-2026-20122: 66461 - 66462

Snort SIDs for CVE-2026-20128: 66468 - 66469

Snort SIDs for the threats detailed in Clusters #1 through 10 are:

  • Snort2: 66200, 66201, 66202
  • Snort3: 301461, 301462, 66252

ClamAV signatures for the malicious tooling associated with these clusters:

  • Unix.Tool.QScanCrack-10059958
  • Unix.Backdoor.NimPlant-10059957
  • Unix.Tool.GSocket-10059956
  • Unix.Backdoor.JSPZapLoot-10059955
  • Unix.Backdoor.GopherRAT-10059941
  • Unix.Backdoor.JSPZap-10059944
  • Unix.Backdoor.JSPZapExcEnc-10059945
  • Unix.Backdoor.GopherRAT-10059941

IOCs

IOCs for the Clusters detailed above are also available in our GitHub repository here.

Cluster 1

  • 38.181.52[.]89
  • 89.125.244[.]33
  • 89.125.244[.]51

Cluster 2

  • 71.80.85[.]135 

Cluster 3

  • 212.83.162[.]37

Cluster 4

  • 38.60.214[.]92
  • 65.20.67[.]134
  • 104.233.156[.]1
  • 194.233.100[.]40

Cluster 5 - AdaptixC2

  • f6f8e0d790645395188fc521039385b7c4f42fa8b426fd035f489f6cda9b5da1

Cluster 5 - AdaptixC2 C2 server

  • 194[.]163[.]175[.]135:4445

Cluster 5 - AdaptixC2 C2 IP

  • 194[.]163[.]175[.]135

Cluster 6 - Sliver

  • 02654acfb21f83485393ba8b14bd8862b919b9ec966fc6768f6aac1338a45ee8

Cluster 6 - Sliver C2 over mTLS

  • mtls[://]23.27.143[.]170:443

Cluster 6 - Sliver C2 IP

  • 23.27.143[.]170

Cluster 7 - XMRig downloader script

  • 0ed72d52347bfe4a78afff8a6982a64050c8fc86d8957a20eeb3e0f3f5342ed0

Cluster 7 - XMRig sample

  • 96fc528ca5e7d1c2b3add5e31b8797cb126f704976c8fbeaecdbf0aa4309ad46

Cluster 7 - XMRig configuration

  • 7aa88a64a527ade7d93c20faf23b54f2ee33ad9b1246cdc2f8ded2ab639affb1

Cluster 7 - XMRig remote location IP

  • 83[.]229[.]126[.]195

Cluster 7 - XMRig remote URL

  • hxxp://83[.]229[.]126[.]195:8081/xmrig

Cluster 7 - XMRig configuration file remote location

  • hxxp://83[.]229[.]126[.]195:8081/config[.]json

Cluster 8 - Nim-based backdoor

  • 0c87871642f84e09e8d3fb23ec36bf55601323e31151a7017a85dbec929cf15d

Cluster 8 - Download URL for the Nim-based backdoor

  • hxxps://1a820b09-95ba-44eb-b350-417e8241b725-00-1lgwuuen9b77p[.]worf[.]replit.dev/download

Cluster 8 - Attacker controlled sub-domain hosting the Nim-based backdoor

  • a820b09-95ba-44eb-b350-417e8241b725-00-1lgwuuen9b77p[.]worf[.]replit.dev

Cluster 8 - Attacker IP that downloaded the Nim-based backdoor

  • 79[.]135[.]105[.]208

Cluster 8 - C2 for Nim-based backdoor

  • hxxp://13[.]62[.]52[.]206:5004 

Cluster 8 - C2 IP for Nim-based backdoor

  • 13[.]62[.]52[.]206

Cluster 8 - KScan – scanning tool

  • 18d77c9c5bbb5b9d5bdfd366fdfcf26bad9e64c63ca865fad711bcce8e3d5a80

Cluster 8 - IP related to Nim-based backdoor and KScan

  • 176[.]65[.]139[.]31

Cluster 9 - gsocket

  • d94f75a70b5cabaf786ac57177ed841732e62bdcc9a29e06e5b41d9be567bcfa

Cluster 9 - gsocket secret file

  • 5bc5998161056b7c8f70c9724d8a63abc7ff8c3843b91c30cffab0899e39b7f8
  • 47[.]104[.]248[.]7
  • b0f51b098842cd630097b462aab0ec357e2c7824af37cca6d08165265da2c2d3

Cluster 10 - Check for root escalation

  • 72f570ce97de3eaaffef33d90b0c337a153fc9690cc34ee207b557d868360060
  • 17302d903baf182f94dc3be40ab1e0874dd0eb2ec5255bf9131fd53591efe925

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://blog.talosintelligence.com/sd-wan-ongoing-exploitation/