Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Low-Rank Masking for Single-Server Matrix Multiplication

arXiv cs.CRby Alejandro Cohen ()1 min read8 · 6 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers prove rank-r additive masks for outsourced matrix multiplication achieve maximal-correlation secrecy of at most q^-r, with a matching lower bound.

An arXiv paper analyzes statistical privacy for outsourcing matrix multiplication over a finite field to a single server using additive masks of rank at most r. Uniform rank-ball masks and products of independent uniform factors yield maximal-correlation secrecy bounded by q^{-r}, with encoding and decoding costing O(n^2 r) field operations. The authors prove an asymptotically matching lower bound for r=o(n), showing these samplers are optimal among input-independent additive masks even with secret invertible transformations. They also show every such mask requires delta approaching 1 in entry-level (epsilon, delta)-differential privacy for fixed field size.

Key facts
  • Uniform rank-ball masks and products of independent uniform factors achieve maximal-correlation secrecy of at most q^-r against complete server views.
  • Matching lower bound proves asymptotic optimality among input-independent additive masks of rank at most r for r=o(n).
  • Encoding and decoding cost O(n^2 r) field operations for independent uniform inputs.
  • Every input-independent rank-r mask requires delta approaching 1 in entry-level (epsilon, delta)-differential privacy at fixed field size.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

We study the statistical privacy of outsourcing matrix multiplication over a finite field ${\mathbb F_q}$ to a single server using additive masks of rank at most $r$.

arXiv cs.CR

By Alejandro Cohen · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.