How the pandemic helped election officials prepare for a flood of misinformation

Election security experts say months of extraordinary preparation during the coronavirus pandemic are paying off.

As Americans await the results of a heated presidential contest, election officials are in the spotlight in a country on edge.

They are trying to sift through a fog of domestic misinformation, and their methodical process for counting and verifying ballots is defying demands to hurry up, or stop. Now, security experts say months of extraordinary preparation during the coronavirus are paying off. After months of explaining how elections would work during a pandemic, state and local officials are projecting confidence to the public by being open about their work.

Election officials have “transformed some of the challenges associated with COVID into opportunities to increase transparency and election administration education,” said Liz Howard, senior counsel at the Democracy Program at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice. “Before the election, when many election officials received calls and questions from voters about their absentee ballot security measures, many offered to provide tours of their offices to the press, the public and voters.”

Some of the most fiercely contested counties in the country are live-streaming the ballot-counting process, as activists outside the election offices make baseless claims about fraud. That includes Maricopa County in Arizona, where a group of supporters of President Donald Trump, some of them armed, showed up to protest. The election center in Maricopa County aimed to increase trust in the process by live-streaming the counting process.

Live video feeds are a no-nonsense way to counter disinformation and hysteria, said Eddie Perez, global director of technology development and open standards at the nonprofit Open Source Election Technology Institute.

“A lot of those feeds, they’re very zen and they’re very calm, if not downright boring,” Perez said. “And that’s a good thing, because it shows that you have a good, methodical, well-organized process for counting ballots.”

Election offices across the country also are taking to Twitter and Facebook to debunk false claims about ballots being tossed in the garbage or burned. They have been buffeted by top academics and researchers who specialize in disinformation, from the Election Integrity Partnership, which has urged the public to rely on state and local election officials for information. The Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, meanwhile, has also swatted down bogus claims through a “rumor control” page.

Election officials and researchers are up against a steady din of false claims of fraud that have defied the guardrails of social media platforms. A Facebook group falsely claiming that Democrats are trying to “steal” the election picked up 325,000 members before the platform shut it down.

The fight against phony and malicious information will continue well past the 2020 election. Some in the elections sector say more resources are needed in that fight.

Ben Hovland, chairman of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, which supports states with election-administration information, said that his agency could use much more money to combat misinformation. The EAC operates on a shoestring budget for a federal agency; it had $11.2 million to work with last fiscal year if you subtract moving and other non-operational expenses.

“With sufficient funding from Congress, I believe we could create a one-stop shop for trusted election information,” Hovland said.

Hovland, who has been blasting out his own tweets on election security, said the fact that U.S. voting processes vary by state creates opportunities for disinformation.

The decentralized nature of the system “means we are more susceptible to mis and disinformation because there is no uniform answer sometimes,” he said.

One answer is to become a poll worker and see the voting process working with your own eyes. “There are just so many checks and balances throughout the process that I think most people don’t experience,” Hovland said. “That’s one of the reasons I recommend people consider serving as a poll worker.”

Election official says Tina Peters would be consultant, won’t have access to election systems

Shasta County registrar Clint Curtis told CyberScoop he needs Peters to help manage the county’s 2026 elections and he’s not concerned about her past conviction.

States are building their own election defense networks as federal support evaporates 

USPS moving forward with mail-in ballot changes as courts weigh Trump’s election order 

Government

• FBI officials say AI is bolstering adversaries, emphasizing need to focus on cyber basics, patching

• Feds accuse China of ‘systematic’ distillation of U.S. AI models

• CIA’s Michael Ellis says cyber intelligence is changing how the agency operates

• The G7 tells industry to hurry up and prep for post-quantum encryption

Technology

• European parliament members call for slowdown of Serbia’s EU entry over spyware use

• FCC proposes public scorecard to rate telecoms on anti-robocall efforts

• Pegasus, NoviSpy variant spyware found on devices of Serbian activists

• Wyden seeks upgraded NSA security guidance on commercial VPN use

Threats

• Chinese espionage groups swarm to exploit triple-link chain of zero-days

• Microsoft discloses two actively exploited zero-days among 974 vulnerabilities

• Russian national extradited to US for alleged involvement in bank-account takeover scheme

• Attackers exploit zero-days in consistently besieged SonicWall product

Policy

• Whistleblower says USPS deploying new, ‘untested’ IT systems governing mail-in ballots

• ‘Watershed 250’ test program in Texas looks to private sector for water cybersecurity help

• Former sexual abuse victims say Grok used their images, videos to train deepfake capabilities

• Cyber threats nudge Trump to sign executive order on foreign equipment in U.S. energy infrastructure