Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Fortinet FortiSandbox Vulnerability Allows Unauthenticated Attackers to Access Sensitive Information

GBHackersby Divya ()2 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Fortinet fixed CVE-2026-26084, an unauthenticated access-control flaw in FortiSandbox GUI rated 8.9 CVSS, with no known exploitation yet.

Fortinet disclosed CVE-2026-26084 (advisory FG-IR-26-166), a CWE-284 improper access control flaw in the GUI of FortiSandbox, FortiSandbox Cloud and FortiSandbox PaaS, rated 8.9 CVSS v3.1. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted HTTP requests to control NAT rules and expose sensitive information. Affected versions include FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and 5.0.0-5.0.5 (plus Cloud/PaaS 5.0.4-5.0.5), fixed in 4.4.9 and 5.0.6. Fortinet researcher Adham El Karn found the flaw internally and the September 8 advisory reports no known exploitation.

Key facts
  • Unauthenticated HTTP requests to the GUI can expose sensitive data via NAT rule control.
  • Fixed versions are 4.4.9+ and 5.0.6+; 5.2 lines are unaffected.
  • Fortinet assigned CVSS 8.9; no public PoC or exploitation reported.
  • Defenders should restrict GUI access to management networks and review logs for anomalous requests.
Analyze CVE-2026-26084 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-26084
Improper Access Control in Fortinet FortiSandbox Exposes Sensitive Data
9.9<1%

From the original article

2 min read at gbhackers.com

Fortinet has disclosed a critical vulnerability involving improper access control in the FortiSandbox web interfaces. This issue could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive information by sending specially crafted HTTP requests. The vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-26084 and documented in advisory FG-IR-26-166.

GBHackers

By Divya · gbhackers.com

Read the full article at GBHackers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.