Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Analog Pin Directionality as an Exfiltration Attack Surface in Mixed-Signal ICs

arXiv cs.CRby Ramana Ranganatham ()1 min read2 · 2 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers demonstrate exfiltration through nominally input-only analog pins in mixed-signal ICs, recovering data at 10 kbps on a 55nm PPG front-end.

The paper identifies a directionality-based attack class in analog/mixed-signal (AMS) ICs where data-dependent circuit-offset modulation converts a nominally input-only pin into an outbound information channel. Three host conditions enable the attack: a closed-loop amplifier, an exposed amplifier input, and sufficiently high impedance at that pin. Silicon validation on a photoplethysmography analog front-end in 55nm CMOS showed exfiltration at up to 10 kbps with error-free PRBS recovery, under 0.001% area overhead, and only 0.03 dB SNR reduction.

Key facts
  • Data-dependent circuit-offset modulation turns input-only analog pins into outbound covert channels.
  • Attack requires a closed-loop amplifier, exposed amplifier input, and high pin impedance.
  • Silicon-proven on a 55nm PPG AFE: 10 kbps exfiltration and error-free PRBS recovery.
  • Payload costs under 0.001% area and reduces filtered PPG SNR by only 0.03 dB.
  • Authors urge treating analog pin directionality as an explicit AMS security property.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Mixed-signal SoCs rely on nominally input-only analog pins to acquire off-chip signals, but the directionality of these interfaces is generally treated as a functional property rather than explicitly verified as a security property.

arXiv cs.CR

By Ramana Ranganatham · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.