Metal bats have pluses for young players, but in the end it comes down to skill
Full article1,120 words · extracted from arstechnica.com · click to collapse
Batter up!
Skill of the hitters was still the biggest factor in how fast the ball came off the bat.
Washington State University scientists conducted batting cage tests of wood and metal bats with young players. Credit: YouTube/Baseball Bat Bros.
Washington State University scientists conducted batting cage tests of wood and metal bats with young players. Credit: YouTube/Baseball Bat Bros.
There’s long been a debate in baseball circles about the respective benefits and drawbacks of using wood bats versus metal bats. However, there are relatively few scientific studies on the topic that focus specifically on young athletes, who are most likely to use metal bats. Scientists at Washington State University (WSU) conducted their own tests of wood and metal bats with young players. They found that while there are indeed performance differences between wooden and metal bats, a batter’s skill is still the biggest factor affecting how fast the ball comes off the bat, according to a new paper published in the Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology.
According to physicist and acoustician Daniel Russell of Penn State University—who was not involved in the study but has a long-standing interest in the physics of baseball ever since his faculty days at Kettering University in Michigan—metal bats were first introduced in 1974 and soon dominated NCAA college baseball, youth baseball, and adult amateur softball. Those programs liked the metal bats because they were less likely to break than traditional wooden bats, reducing costs.
Players liked them because it can be easier to control metal bats and swing faster, as the center of mass is closer to the balance point in the bat’s handle, resulting in a lower moment of inertia (or “swing weight”). A faster swing doesn’t mean that a hit ball will travel faster, however, since the lower moment of inertia is countered by a decreased collision efficiency. Metal bats are also more forgiving if players happen to hit the ball away from the proverbial “sweet spot” of the bat. (The definition of the sweet spot is a bit fuzzy because it is sometimes defined in different ways, but it’s commonly understood to be the area on the bat’s barrel that results in the highest batted ball speeds.)
“There’s more of a penalty when you’re not on the sweet spot with wood bats than with the other metal bats,” said Lloyd Smith, director of WSU’s Sport Science Laboratory and a co-author of the latest study. “[And] wood is still heavy. Part of baseball is hitting the ball far, but the other part is just hitting the ball. If you have a heavy bat, you’re going to have a harder time making contact because it’s harder to control.”
Metal bats may also improve performance via a kind of “trampoline effect.” Metal bats are hollow, while wood bats are solid. When a ball hits a wood bat, the bat barrel compresses by as much as 75 percent, such that internal friction forces decrease the initial energy by as much as 75 percent. A metal bat barrel behaves more like a spring when it compresses in response to a ball’s impact, so there is much less energy loss. Based on his own research back in 2004, Russell has found that improved performance of metal bats is linked to the frequency of the barrel’s mode of vibration, aka the “hoop mode.” (Bats with the lowest hoop frequency will have the highest performance.)
Swing, batter, batter, swing!
The WSU team has been working with USA Baseball on developing a new metal bat standard, conducting numerous lab and field studies on the performance of different kinds of bats. The organization introduced a new performance threshold in 2018 with a bat that was more “wood-like” in its properties. There are many ways to achieve those wood-like properties, and the lack of data and high variability of young players (both in size and athletic ability) makes it challenging to identify the best performance parameters to target. So Smith et al. set out to more fully characterize the relationship between the speed of batted balls, bat inertial properties, and bat performance.
For this latest batting cage study, Smith et al. recruited 52 young 12-year-old athletes (51 male, one female) and asked them to swing three different commercially available baseball bats in two different weights—six bats in all. One type was solid wood typical of the bats used prior to 1970; one was a hollow design like the bats adopted by most youth leagues in 2000 (the BPF 1.15); and the third was the USA Baseball hollow design adopted in 2018. All the bats were painted black to hide the make and model in order to reduce perceptual bias. Each bat had several spherical reflective markers, the better to track the bats’ motion with high-speed infrared cameras. The baseballs were wrapped in reflective tape for the same reason.
The balls were pitched underhanded and at lower speed to increase the batting averages of the participants, and each batter swung each of six bats five times. The batters were divided into alternating groups of four to minimize fatigue. A total of 1,512 swings were recorded, and the team used that footage to measure the speed of the swings and the balls’ exit speeds.
Smith et al. found that balls hit with the BPF 1.15 metal bats had higher exit speeds than the wooden bats—an expected finding, since youth leagues stopped using these bats precisely because of that performance advantage. The ball exit speeds with USA Baseball bats fell halfway between the BPF and wooden bat speeds. They determined that the exit speed depends strongly on the bat-ball coefficient of restitution and a player’s swing speed, while swing speed in turn is strongly dependent on the bat’s inertia. Thus, the team concluded that a metal bat should take into account those two parameters (coefficient of restitution and inertia) to affect exit speed.
That said, ultimately it comes down to the athletic skill levels of the players. “If you’re really trying to hit the ball far, you’re going to get a much bigger payoff by working out and getting stronger, especially if you’re a young kid and growing fast,” said Smith. “That’s going to have a much larger effect on how hard you hit the ball, than on what bat you buy.”
Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17543371241260098 (About DOIs).
Jennifer is a senior writer at Ars Technica with a particular focus on where science meets culture, covering everything from physics and related interdisciplinary topics to her favorite films and TV series. Jennifer lives in Baltimore with her spouse, physicist Sean M. Carroll, and their two cats, Ariel and Caliban.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/09/metal-bats-have-pluses-for-young-players-but-in-the-end-it-comes-down-to-skill/