Trump moves to pardon Colorado election clerk Tina Peters, even though he can’t

Peters, one of many election deniers Trump has sought to shield from legal consequences, is serving a nine-year state prison sentence that can’t be nullified by a presidential pardon.

President Donald Trump announced Thursday his intention to issue a federal pardon for an individual convicted in connection with efforts related to challenging the 2020 election results. However, on this occasion, the person in question will remain behind bars.

In a statement on Truth Social, Trump said he was pardoning Tina Peters, a former Mesa County election clerk currently serving a nine-year prison sentence for facilitating a data breach involving voting system data in the wake of the 2020 presidential election.

“Democrats have been relentless in their targeting of TINA PETERS, a Patriot who simply wanted to make sure our Elections were Fair and Honest,” Trump wrote Thursday. “Tina is sitting in a Colorado prison for the ‘crime’ of demanding Honest Elections. Today, I am granting Tina a full Pardon for her attempts to expose Voter Fraud in the Rigged 2020 Presidential Election!”

Peters’ leaks revealed no evidence of voter fraud, and the incident is widely viewed as one of the most serious breaches of election system security in modern history.

But more importantly, Trump’s pardon powers only extend to federal crimes and would not apply to Peters, who was tried and convicted by the state of Colorado. That means Peters’ sentence will remain valid and in full effect even if a federal pardon is issued.

State officials do have the power to release Peters, but have been adamant that she was lawfully and rightfully convicted by a jury of her peers and remains unrepentant for her crimes.

While the actual language of Peters’ pardon has yet to be released, the Trump White House has seemingly acknowledged in the past that the president has no legal authority to free Peters for state-level crimes.

In May, Trump unsuccessfully called for Colorado officials to release Peters from prison and directed his Department of Justice to “take all necessary steps” to assist in the matter while referring to her as a “political prisoner.” These initial messages did not mention or threaten a pardon, and strongly implied that the decision was legally up to Colorado state officials.

At the time, Colorado Democratic Attorney General Phil Weiser, who Trump called “radical left,” told CyberScoop that Peters’ sentence was a reflection of the severity of her crimes and that federal efforts to overturn it would not deter them. He reiterated that stance in an interview when asked if Colorado would turn Peters over to federal authorities while any potential court challenges play out.

“No, there’s no legal authority for any federal government action to take a prisoner who is in state custody, lawfully having been tried, convicted and sentenced,” Weiser told Denver, Colorado’s 9News. “This is an important principle of our Constitution, and everyone who says they care about the rule of law, about public safety and our constitution needs to care about this issue.”

That position was backed up by Democratic Governor Jared Polis, the only U.S. official with the legal power to pardon Peters for her crimes.

 “Tina Peters was convicted by a jury of her peers, prosecuted by a Republican District Attorney, and found guilty of violating Colorado state laws, including criminal impersonation,” Polis wrote on BlueSky. “No President has jurisdiction over state law nor the power to pardon a person for state convictions.”

At Peters’ sentencing last year, one month before Trump would be elected to a second term, neighbors and public officials alike testified about the harm her actions caused to them and the broader Mesa community.

In handing down his sentence, Judge Matthew Barrett called Peters a “charlatan” who had expressed no remorse for her actions or their damage.

“I’m convinced you’d do it all over again,” Barrett said.

Election official says Tina Peters would be consultant, won’t have access to election systems

Shasta County registrar Clint Curtis told CyberScoop he needs Peters to help manage the county’s 2026 elections and he’s not concerned about her past conviction.

A California county wants to hire Tina Peters to help run its elections

Tina Peters, convicted in election-security breach, emerges defiant and vows legal fight

Government

• FBI officials say AI is bolstering adversaries, emphasizing need to focus on cyber basics, patching

• Feds accuse China of ‘systematic’ distillation of U.S. AI models

• CIA’s Michael Ellis says cyber intelligence is changing how the agency operates

• The G7 tells industry to hurry up and prep for post-quantum encryption

Technology

• European parliament members call for slowdown of Serbia’s EU entry over spyware use

• FCC proposes public scorecard to rate telecoms on anti-robocall efforts

• Pegasus, NoviSpy variant spyware found on devices of Serbian activists

• Wyden seeks upgraded NSA security guidance on commercial VPN use

Threats

• Chinese espionage groups swarm to exploit triple-link chain of zero-days

• Microsoft discloses two actively exploited zero-days among 974 vulnerabilities

• Russian national extradited to US for alleged involvement in bank-account takeover scheme

• Attackers exploit zero-days in consistently besieged SonicWall product

Policy

• ‘Watershed 250’ test program in Texas looks to private sector for water cybersecurity help

• Former sexual abuse victims say Grok used their images, videos to train deepfake capabilities

• Cyber threats nudge Trump to sign executive order on foreign equipment in U.S. energy infrastructure

• Bipartisan Senate bill aims to prepare energy sector for Q-Day