PrivEscalate: Measuring and Augmenting the Threat of LLM-Automated Linux Privilege Escalation
Researchers release PrivEscalate, a 531-scenario benchmark showing LLM agents' Linux privilege-escalation success varies by vulnerability class, plus PrivEscAgent, a domain-specialized agent that boosts success.
The paper introduces PrivEscalate, an open-source benchmark of 531 Dockerized Linux privilege-escalation scenarios spanning 14 sub-categories, plus 329 parameterized variants measuring sensitivity to environmental distractors. Evaluating six LLMs across three agent architectures shows capability is heterogeneous across vulnerability classes, sensitive to perturbation, and architecture-dependent. The authors also present PrivEscAgent, a wrapper adding deterministic enumeration, category matching, and step planning that outperforms prior privesc-agent baselines without modifying the underlying LLM. The benchmark is released to support LLM agent evaluation, defensive tool validation, and red-team training.
- 531 Dockerized scenarios across 14 privilege-escalation sub-categories, with 329 distractor variants
- Six LLMs and three agent architectures evaluated; no single model dominates high-prevalence classes
- Configuration rotation disrupts some agent exploit attempts but does not eliminate measured risk
- PrivEscAgent wrapper improves over prior privesc-agent baselines without LLM modifications
- Open-sourced for agent evaluation, defensive tool validation, and red-team training
- Products
- PrivEscalatePrivEscAgentReAct
From the original article
1 min read at arxiv.orgAs Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly automate offensive operations across the cyber kill chain, their efficacy in complex local post-exploitation tasks remains inadequately quantified. Among these, Linux privilege escalation is a key step between initial access and full system compromise.
By Yixuan Liu · arxiv.org
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.