ZeroHour
CyberScooppublished ()ingested @timstarks

House appropriators have reservations — or worse — about proposed CISA cuts

criticalExploit / PoC exploited in the wildimportance 60
Full article879 words · extracted from cyberscoop.com · click to collapse
Skip to main content

Get our latest cybersecurity news first on Google.

Click here!

A top Republican said lawmakers needed more information about the proposed reductions, while Democrats were more searing in their criticisms.

Listen to this article

0:00

Learn more.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem (R) greets House Appropriations' Homeland Security Subcommittee Chairman Mark Amodei, R-Nev., before a hearing in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill on May 6. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

House appropriators on Tuesday challenged proposed budget cuts for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, with Democrats saying the Trump administration was disturbingly moving money away from the agency and a key Republican saying he needed to see justifications for the reductions.

The Trump administration has proposed cutting CISA funding by $491 million, and some members of a House Appropriations subcommittee raised doubts about that idea during testimony from Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Specific details for those budget cuts weren’t released in the so-called “skinny budget” last week.

Homeland Security subcommittee chair Rep. Mark Amodei, R-Nev., said that at a time when leading Hill voices and others are saying China is getting the better of the United States in cyberspace and as CISA personnel cuts are already underway, appropriators need more information on the budget proposal.

“What is the plan?” he asked at the end of the hearing. “When somebody says, ‘Hey, you guys presided over cutting half a billion dollars to do other stuff, what was that based on?’ We don’t want to be in the position of, and won’t be in the position of, ‘That’s what they said we needed.’ We need some building blocks. What’s the plan for us to be kicking China’s butt, and how we’re still OK on that civilian sector stuff?”

The top Democrat on Amodei’s panel, Rep. Lauren Underwood, D-Ill., decried DHS for “moving money away from CISA,” as she said to Noem.

Last week you said we should ‘just wait’ for the president’s grand cyber plan,” Underwood said. “But you have not waited to erode the department’s cyber defense capabilities by removing resources and personnel from CISA and other components.” 

Noem said the president’s cyber plan would be “coming out shortly and that’s the president’s prerogative.”

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, said the DHS proposal was “overfunding some efforts, mainly for messaging purposes,” and “at the expense” of programs like cybersecurity. He went further, saying the budget “ignores and even attacks other functions of DHS,” among them CISA.

Noem maintained that instead of “censorship,” CISA is “back to securing our critical infrastructure.” While past CISA officials have denied all allegations of engaging in censorship, any amount of work it did on countering election misinformation and disinformation had largely fallen to the wayside under the Biden administration, and at best, the overall election security work was reported to be a miniscule part of the agency budget.

In her written testimony, Noem said the agency has “dramatically increased our cyber operations to prevent threats and address vulnerabilities within the Federal Government,” but she didn’t elaborate nor was she questioned about what she meant.

More Scoops

A data center in Vernon, Calif. They are groups calling for AI, and the technology it sits on, to be designated as critical infrastructure. (Getty Images)

The push to designate AI as the next critical infrastructure sector

The designation would unlock a range of federal services, tools and resources for an industry that policymakers view as increasingly tied to national and economic security.

Digital legal compliance and government regulation concept with security icons, creative graphic style, on blurred US flag background. 3D Rendering. ismagilov, istock/Getty Images Plus

Industry’s message on CIRCIA: Please ask us fewer questions about cyberattacks

WASHINGTON, DC – JUNE 30: White House Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought testifies before a House Appropriations Subcommittee on Capitol Hill on June 30, 2026 in Washington, DC. The Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government heard testimony from Vought on President Trump’s FY2027 budget request. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Trump budget boss Russell Vought open to re-staffing CISA

Latest Podcasts

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://cyberscoop.com/house-questions-trump-cisa-budget-cuts-2025/