Treasury removes Intellexa spyware

The three had only just been added to the list in 2024, but a U.S. official said they had separated themselves from the company.

The Trump administration this week removed three people from its sanctions list who were previously accused of working for Intellexa, the consortium behind the Predator spyware that recent investigations say has circumvented human rights safeguards.

The Biden administration imposed sanctions against the trio in 2024 as part of a broader move to sanction spyware operators. The Treasury Department noted the deletions this week as part of other sanctions moves.

Under the prior sanctions designations, the Biden administration said that Merom Harpaz was manager of Intellexa S.A., a member of the consortium; that Andrea Nicola Constantino Hermes Gambazzi was functionally the owner of Thalestris Limited and Intellexa Limited, two other consortium members; and that Sara Aleksandra Fayssal Hamou was a corporate off-shoring specialist who has provided managerial services to the Intellexa Consortium.

While the Tuesday notice about the sanctions removal provided no explanation, “this removal was done as part of the normal administrative process in response to a petition request for reconsideration,” a U.S. official told CyberScoop.

“Each individual has demonstrated measures to separate themselves from the Intellexa Consortium and it has been determined that the circumstances resulting in the sanction no longer apply,” the official said. “The power of sanctions derive not only from the ability to designate individuals, but also from our willingness to remove sanctions consistent with the law.”

Only last month, an investigation concluded that despite sanctions against those three individuals and others, Intellexa had retained the capacity to remotely access the systems of Predator customers, raising human rights questions. Other reports from last month found evidence of expanded Predator targeting and exploitation of malicious mobile advertisements to infect targets.

Researchers and advocates who work on spyware issues found the sanctions removals concerning.

“The public deserves to know what evidence exists to prove that these individuals have ceased their involvement with Intellexa,” Natalia Krapiva, senior tech-legal counsel at Access Now, wrote on Bluesky.

John Scott-Railton, senior researcher at the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab, said on X that he found the removals “puzzling,” adding that “Some in the mercenary spyware ecosystem are probably reading today’s Intellexa exec [delisting] as: ‘scoff at US, help hack Americans & you can still skirt consequences with the right lobbying.’”

UPDATE (1/13/2026): An earlier version of this article contained an inaccurate reference to the subjects’ nationality; that reference has since been removed.

Government

• FBI officials say AI is bolstering adversaries, emphasizing need to focus on cyber basics, patching

• Feds accuse China of ‘systematic’ distillation of U.S. AI models

• CIA’s Michael Ellis says cyber intelligence is changing how the agency operates

• The G7 tells industry to hurry up and prep for post-quantum encryption

Technology

• FCC proposes public scorecard to rate telecoms on anti-robocall efforts

• Wyden seeks upgraded NSA security guidance on commercial VPN use

• The Collective Cyber Defense letter wrote your next vendor questionnaire

• Former sexual abuse victims say Grok used their images, videos to train deepfake capabilities

Threats

• Chinese espionage groups swarm to exploit triple-link chain of zero-days

• Microsoft discloses two actively exploited zero-days among 974 vulnerabilities

• Russian national extradited to US for alleged involvement in bank-account takeover scheme

• Attackers exploit zero-days in consistently besieged SonicWall product

Policy

• Whistleblower says USPS deploying new, ‘untested’ IT systems governing mail-in ballots

• ‘Watershed 250’ test program in Texas looks to private sector for water cybersecurity help

• Cyber threats nudge Trump to sign executive order on foreign equipment in U.S. energy infrastructure

• Election official says Tina Peters would be consultant, won’t have access to election systems