ZeroHour
CyberScooppublished ()ingested @timstarks

As voters cast their ballots, courts nationwide issue election security edicts

criticalPolicy & legal exploited in the wildimportance 60
Full article1,032 words · extracted from cyberscoop.com · click to collapse
Skip to main content

Get our latest cybersecurity news first on Google.

Click here!

The court fights over the long weekend stretched from California to Pennsylvania.

paper ballot, election, vote by mail, voting
Paper ballots for a 2020 election. (MultCo Communications / Flickr)

Legal battles with election security implications raged across the country over the holiday weekend, even with early voting well underway at historic levels in many states.

In no state did those two things coincide more than in Georgia. Peach State voters amassed in lines marked by reports of 10-hour waits on Tuesday, following two key court rulings.

Northern District of Georgia Judge Amy Totenberg on Sunday denied a bid to scuttle touch screen voting machines over cybersecurity vulnerabilities. On Monday, she also denied a request to require a specific number of emergency ballots to be on hand at Georgia polling sites.

The ruling Sunday represented a setback for election integrity advocates who contend that Georgia’s machines have not been secure enough, and still aren’t.

Totenberg ruled last year that Georgia must phase out its existing paperless voting machines, citing doubts about cybersecurity safeguards for direct-recording election equipment tabulations that couldn’t be audited without a paper record. But the plaintiffs contended that Georgia’s replacement ballot-marking devices, which print out scannable paper records, aren’t as secure as hand-marked ballots, either.

In the Sunday ruling, Totenberg wrote that there were still “fundamental deficits and exposure” in the Georgia system, and that the plaintiffs “have put on a strong case they may prevail on the merits at some future juncture.” But she wrote that the state’s ability “to turn on a dime and switch to a full-scale handmarked paper ballot system is contradicted by the entire messy electoral record of the past years,” and the Supreme Court has emphasized restraint on major electoral changes near the 2020 election.

Marilyn Marks, executive director for the Coalition for Good Governance, a plaintiff in the suit, tweeted that her organization was disappointed in the ruling, even though it acknowledged the security fears about the state’s system.

2/ There is no doubt that the system is unsafe, and all the evidence points to it. But the Court feels that the State cannot manage a quick change to hand marked ballots.

We urge voters to use mail ballots & deliver them to county office or dropbox. Must be there by 7pm Nov.3

— Marilyn Marks (@MarilynRMarks1) October 12, 2020

Common Cause Georgia Executive Director Aunna Dennis, whose organization filed an amicus brief in the bid to require more emergency paper ballots, said more issues loom in the state.

“There are going to be tech errors. There are going to be human errors,” she said. “This is the first time many voters are interacting with this election system.”

In three other states, ballot drop boxes were at the epicenter of the disputes.

In Pennsylvania on Friday, Western District Judge Nicholas Ranjan sided against a Donald Trump campaign and GOP effort to block mail ballot boxes, and to require precise signature matches on mail-in ballots.

California’s secretary of state and attorney general issued cease-and-desist letters to the state’s Republican party on Monday, which said it was responsible for placing unauthorized drop boxes around the country that looked like official ones — and that it would continue to distribute them.

And the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled on Monday that Texas could restrict absentee ballot drop boxes to one spot per county.

The Oct. 11 ruling from Judge Totenburg is available in full below.

[documentcloud url=”http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7229002-2020-10-11-Opinion-Dckt-964-0.html” responsive=true]

More Scoops

An election worker processes mail-in ballots at the Los Angeles County Ballot Processing Center during California’s state primary election in the City of Industry, California, on June 2, 2026. Californians go to the polls Tuesday in the first round of voting for a new governor, with a tight three-way race for two run-off spots, while people in Los Angeles will also be voting for a new mayor. The state’s so-called “jungle primary” pits all comers against each other — regardless of party — with the top two vote-getters advancing to the November general election to replace term-limited Governor Gavin Newsom. (Photo by Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images)

SCOTUS tosses one of two injunctions against Trump USPS mail-in ballot rules

The 6-3 decision dismisses one lawsuit brought by states, saying they have no standing to sue because the disputed sections “neither requires nor forbids anything of anyone outside…

Norwalk, CA – June 01: A person places their Mail in ballot into a ballot box during early voting outside of the LA County Registrar-Recorder building on Monday, June 1, 2026 in Norwalk, CA. (Ronaldo Bolaños / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Supreme Court approves mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day 

A voter casts a ballot in a drop box outside the Union Market Super Vote Center during early voting in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, October 28, 2020. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

USPS moving forward with mail-in ballot changes as courts weigh Trump’s election order 

Latest Podcasts

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://cyberscoop.com/mail-ballots-georgia-pennsylvania-election-security/