ZeroHour
CyberScooppublished ()ingested @CyberScoopNews

Digital rights groups sound alarm on Stop CSAM Act

criticalExploit / PoC exploited in the wildimportance 60
Full article1,229 words · extracted from cyberscoop.com · click to collapse
Skip to main content

Get our latest cybersecurity news first on Google.

Click here!

The organizations say a reintroduced version of the bill would “break” encryption for most Americans and make it impossible for end-to-end encrypted service providers to avoid lawsuits.

Listen to this article

0:00

Learn more.

encrypted phone, encryption, mobile, messaging
(Getty Images)

Digital rights groups are urging Senate leaders not to move forward with a bill that would impose new regulations on companies around child sexual abuse material, arguing that the legislation could be a privacy nightmare for Americans.

In a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Committee leaders Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the groups – which include the American Civil Liberties Union, Freedom of the Press Foundation, Defending Rights and Dissent and RootsAction – say the STOP CSAM Act, reintroduced in May, “walks back a number of important privacy protections that had been included in a previous version of the bill.”

“The current bill creates enormous incentives for platforms to stop offering encrypted services that are critical for enabling all of us to have private conversations and securely store files from our most personal moments, like photos from a child’s birthday,” the letter reads.. “While all of our groups want to stop the harmful transmission of child sexual abuse material (CSAM), its transmission is already illegal, and these modifications to the bill do nothing more than undermine privacy and security.”

The Stop CSAM Act would impose new requirements on companies to prevent the hosting and distribution of child sexual abuse material on their platforms.

It expands companies’ legal obligations by requiring them to report instances of such material on their sites to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.  It also introduces stricter privacy protections for children who testify in court. Additionally, and would require businesses with more than 1 million unique monthly visitors or users or $50 million in annual revenue to submit annual reports to the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice.

It would also seek to alter immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act for “interactive computer services,” allowing victims to file civil lawsuits against companies that fail to remove CSAM content from their platforms in a timely fashion.

The bill includes language specifying that “any person who is a victim of the intentional, knowing, or reckless hosting or storing of child pornography or making child pornography available to any person by a provider of an interactive computer service, and who suffers personal injury as a result of such hosting, storing, or making available, regardless of when the injury occurred, may bring a civil action.”

Digital rights groups say that the new version of the legislation includes “recklessness” as a legal standard for liability and by applying it to any “interactive computer service,” the legislation would capture virtually all applications that rely on end-to-end encryption.

That in turn could open up providers of these services to civil lawsuits for hosting material that they can’t view without breaking the encryption of their users.

“[The bill] goes much further than current law and threatens to punish any service that works to keep its users secure, including those that do their best to eliminate and report CSAM,” wrote India McKinney of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “The bill applies to ‘interactive computer services,’ which broadly includes private messaging and email apps, social media platforms, cloud storage providers, and many other internet intermediaries and online service providers.”

It’s not clear whether the groups’ warnings on data privacy will have much influence in this Congress. Politically, forcing private companies do more to counter child sexual abuse material on their platforms and websites has been broadly popular with the public, and online child safety is a top issue for congressional Republicans, who control both houses of Congress. Grassley is not known as a strong advocate of unrestricted encryption. He previously led a bipartisan congressional effort in 2018 to develop legislation that would would have compelled companies to grant law enforcement access to encrypted communications in investigations.

Another bill introduced this Congress, the Take It Down Act, carried similar take down requirements for companies around AI-generated nonconsensual deepfake pornography. Though many of the same groups loudly opposed the measure on similar privacy grounds, it ultimately passed 402-2 in the House and unanimously in the Senate before being swiftly signed into law by President Donald Trump.

The letter to Grassley and Durbin emphasizes that private communications – underpinned by strong digital encryption – are critical to healthy, functioning democratic societies and have many benefits to marginalized or targeted populations.

“That is why encrypted services are popular amongst journalists who use encrypted messages to contact their sources, protesters seeking to organize to raise their voices against unjust government action, doctors who use it to speak with patients, domestic violence victims who rely on completely private communications to escape dangerous situations at home, and businesses discussing finances with clients,” the letter reads. “But there would also be severe consequences for groups that are being targeted by governments domestically and globally.”

More Scoops

An inflatable effigy of SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, protesting Musk’s Grok AI, stands in Times Square in New York City on June 11, 2026. (Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP via Getty Images)

Former sexual abuse victims say Grok used their images, videos to train deepfake capabilities

Elon Musk claimed he was aware of “literally zero” CSAM content created through Grok. A new lawsuit from thousands of real victims say the model was trained…

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 03: (L-R) Chairman Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Ranking member Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) arrive for a hearing with the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee in the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on December 3, 2025 in Washington, DC. Senator Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., wants hearings to force AT&T and Verizon to disclose how they’ve responded to the hacks to protect telecom networks. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Senate set to debate package of bills on privacy, AI and kids safety 

The Department of Justice building is seen in Washington, DC, on August 9, 2022. (Photo by Stefani Reynolds / AFP) (Photo by STEFANI REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

764 splinter group leader sentenced to 40 years in jail

Latest Podcasts

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://cyberscoop.com/digital-rights-groups-oppose-stop-csam-act-encryption/