ZeroHour
CyberScooppublished ()ingested @WatermanReports

DHS inspector general probing Georgia website scans

criticalExploit / PoC exploited in the wildimportance 60
Full article1,011 words · extracted from cyberscoop.com · click to collapse
Skip to main content

Get our latest cybersecurity news first on Google.

Click here!

The probe follows calls for an investigation from congressional critics of DHS' election cybersecurity efforts.

Georgia state flag
Georgia state flag (Getty Images)

Following congressional requests for action, the inspector general at the Department of Homeland Security has opened an investigation into a series of incidents last year when Georgia state officials have alleged their computer network was scanned by DHS officials.

The independent watchdog “is investigating a series of ten alleged scanning events of the Georgia Secretary of State’s network that may have originated from DHS-affiliated IP addresses,” Inspector General John Roth says in a letter to Secretary of State Brian Kemp, dated Jan 17.

The letter asks for web-traffic and network logs for an hour either side of the time of the 10 alleged scans — which date back to February and ended shortly after the election last year —and for copies of any intrusion alerts that resulted.

The letter was first reported this week by the Associated Press and then posted online by the Daily Caller. An official in the inspector general’s office confirmed the investigation and the letter to CyberScoop, but declined to provide any further details, noting it was an ongoing investigation.

The investigation follows a call from House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah.

On Jan 11, in letters to Roth and then Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, Chaffetz described the incidents as “unsuccessful attempts to penetrate the Georgia Secretary of State’s firewall.”

The incidents came to national attention after they were caught up in a row over DHS’s election cybersecurity efforts.

In the runup to the presidential poll last November, Kemp became one of the loudest voices opposing DHS plans for federal assistance to state authorities to help cyber-secure their election systems, calling it “overreach,” and a “power grab.”

“At no time has my office agreed to or permitted DHS to conduct penetration testing or security scans of our network,” Kemp wrote to DHS in December. “Moreover, your department has not contacted my office since this unsuccessful incident to alert us of any security event that would require testing or scanning of our network. This is especially odd and concerning since I serve on the Election Cyber Security Working Group that your office created.”

Johnson responded that the event appeared to be “normal … interaction” with the secretary of state’s website by a DHS staffer trying to verify a professional license — not any kind of security test or scan.

Then, just days before leaving office, Johnson signed an order designating the U.S. election system as “critical infrastructure.” At the stroke of a pen, the designation adds the physical and digital property of countless state and county government offices to a special list of 16 categories of vital national industry — ranging from banking and telephones to water and sewage systems — that DHS has special authority to protect.

Defenders of the decision say it doesn’t give federal authorities any power over elections, and will put vital election machinery under the protective umbrella of the international norms the U.S. is promoting for cyberspace — which prohibit cyberattacks on critical infrastructure in peacetime.

Critics — numbering many of the state officials, including Democrats, who actually run elections — say they were already getting assistance from DHS and question why so many offline elements of election infrastructure were included in the designation.

More Scoops

An election worker processes mail-in ballots at the Los Angeles County Ballot Processing Center during California’s state primary election in the City of Industry, California, on June 2, 2026. Californians go to the polls Tuesday in the first round of voting for a new governor, with a tight three-way race for two run-off spots, while people in Los Angeles will also be voting for a new mayor. The state’s so-called “jungle primary” pits all comers against each other — regardless of party — with the top two vote-getters advancing to the November general election to replace term-limited Governor Gavin Newsom. (Photo by Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images)

SCOTUS tosses one of two injunctions against Trump USPS mail-in ballot rules

The 6-3 decision dismisses one lawsuit brought by states, saying they have no standing to sue because the disputed sections “neither requires nor forbids anything of anyone outside…

A secure storage area is pictured as vote-by-mail ballots for the August 4 Washington state primary are processed at King County Elections in Renton, Washington on August 3, 2020. (Photo by Jason Redmond / AFP) (Photo by JASON REDMOND/AFP via Getty Images)

States are building their own election defense networks as federal support evaporates 

The information sharing effort will allow intelligence community agencies to interact with key owners and operators of water, power, internet and telecommunications to coordinate on cyberattacks and digital vulnerabilities. (Getty Images)

DHS to unveil replacement council for critical infrastructure cybersecurity

Latest Podcasts

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://cyberscoop.com/dhs-inspector-general-georgia-web-scans/