Vulnerability landscape in Q4 2025
Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →
| CVE | Vulnerability | CVSS | EPSS | Flags | Affected | Exposure | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-0199 | Remote Code Execution in Microsoft Office and WordPad via crafted document files CVE-2017-0199 is a remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Office and WordPad that stems from improper parsing of specially crafted files. Attackers trigger it by getting a user to open a malicious document, after which attacker-controlled code executes with the privileges of the logged-in user. Anyone running the affected Microsoft Office or WordPad software is exposed, and CISA notes the flaw has been leveraged in ransomware campaigns; no CVSS score is available in the source data. The flaw was added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2021-11-03, and EPSS assigns a 99.9% probability of exploitation within 30 days (100th percentile), indicating active, ongoing exploitation. Do: Apply Microsoft's security updates for Office and Windows per vendor instructions, as required by CISA's KEV catalog; the flaw was publicly reported as fixed in Microsoft's April 2017 security updates. Until patched, treat unsolicited Office documents and email attachments as high-risk, since exploitation requires a user to open a crafted file. Verify that all Office and WordPad installations across the estate—especially endpoints that handle untrusted documents—have received the update. | 7.8 | 100% | KEV ransomware PoC ×6 |
| masshundreds of millions of Office installations worldwide (exact count unknown) | |
| CVE-2017-11882 | Memory Corruption RCE in Microsoft Office via Legacy Equation Editor CVE-2017-11882 is a memory corruption vulnerability (CWE-119) in Microsoft Office, residing in the legacy Microsoft Equation Editor component (EQNEDT32.EXE), that allows remote code execution in the context of the current user. Attackers trigger it by persuading a user to open a crafted document, most commonly an RTF file or other Office document carrying a malicious embedded equation object, which overflows a buffer while the equation content is parsed. Successful exploitation lets the attacker run arbitrary code with the privileges of the signed-in user, a typical foothold for malware delivery and, per CISA, for ransomware operations. Any environment running affected Microsoft Office builds is exposed; the source data does not enumerate specific affected version ranges. The flaw is confirmed exploited in the wild: it was added to the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2021-11-03 with known ransomware use and holds a 99.9% EPSS score (percentile 100), though the source data lists no public PoC. Do: Apply Microsoft's Office security updates (November 2017 or later) across all endpoints, prioritizing this KEV-listed flaw given its known ransomware use. On systems that cannot yet be patched, disable or unregister the legacy Equation Editor (EQNEDT32.EXE) and consider blocking or warning on RTF attachments as interim mitigations. Check for indicators of abuse such as EQNEDT32.EXE spawning unexpected child processes after document opens. | 7.8 | 100% | KEV ransomware PoC ×10 |
| masshundreds of millions of users/installations (Office is near-ubiquitous on Windows and in enterprises; the share still unpatched is unknown) | |
| CVE-2018-0802 | Memory Corruption RCE in Microsoft Office Equation Editor A memory-corruption flaw (out-of-bounds write, CWE-787) in the legacy Equation Editor component (EQNEDT32.EXE) shipped with Microsoft Office 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2016 allows remote code execution due to improper handling of objects in memory. An attacker triggers it by persuading a user to open a specially crafted document (for example an RTF or DOCX containing a malformed embedded equation object), causing the Equation Editor process to corrupt memory when the file is opened in Word; the user-interaction requirement is reflected in the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/UI:R). Successful exploitation gives the attacker code execution in the context of the current user, with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 3.1 score 7.8, High). Any user of the affected Office versions, the Office Compatibility Pack, or Word on an unpatched system is affected. Exploitation is confirmed in the wild: the flaw is in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03) with known ransomware use, carries a 93.3% EPSS probability of exploitation within 30 days, and multiple public analyses and proof-of-concepts exist. Do: Apply Microsoft's January 2018 security updates for Office 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2016 and the Office Compatibility Pack, and verify the legacy Equation Editor executable (EQNEDT32.EXE) on endpoints has been patched or removed (Microsoft later retired the component). Because the flaw is exploited in the wild and used in ransomware campaigns, prioritize remediation per CISA KEV required action and hunt for Word spawning EQNEDT32.EXE or unexpected child processes when documents are opened. Until patched, open untrusted documents in Protected View and treat email-delivered RTF/DOCX attachments as untrusted. | 7.8 | 93% | KEV ransomware PoC ×3 |
| masshundreds of millions of Office users at time of disclosure (vulnerable Equation Editor shipped by default with Office 2007-2016); largely patched today, with… | |
| CVE-2019-13272 | Local Privilege Escalation to Root in Linux Kernel ptrace (pkexec PTRACE_TRACEME) CVE-2019-13272 is an improper privilege management flaw in the Linux kernel's ptrace_link function (kernel/ptrace.c), present in kernels before 5.1.17, in which the credentials of a process requesting a ptrace relationship are mishandled. A local attacker triggers it by stepping into a parent-child process chain where a privileged parent drops privileges and calls execve, typically by abusing Polkit's pkexec helper with PTRACE_TRACEME; contributing factors include an object lifetime issue and incorrect marking of the ptrace relationship as privileged. Successful exploitation grants the attacker full root-level privileges on the host, and the object lifetime bug can in some cases cause a system panic. Any Linux system running an unpatched kernel is affected, spanning the upstream kernel and distributions such as Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu, Red Hat Enterprise Linux and its variants, as well as NetApp AFF A700s firmware. The flaw is in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-12-10), has multiple public proof-of-concept exploits, and carries a high exploitation probability (EPSS ~52%), so defenders should treat it as an active exploitation risk. Do: Upgrade the Linux kernel to 5.1.17 or later, or install the backported kernel update from your distribution (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Red Hat) and NetApp's fixed firmware for AFF A700s, per CISA's required action to apply vendor updates. Where patching is delayed, SELinux with deny_ptrace may serve as a usable mitigation in some environments. Prioritize hosts that expose local shells to untrusted users and that have Polkit's pkexec installed, and verify the running kernel version (not just the installed package) on each system. | 7.8 | 52% | KEV PoC ×5 |
| masstens of millions of installations (Linux hosts on unpatched kernels across servers, cloud instances, desktops and embedded devices) | |
| CVE-2021-22555 | Linux Kernel Netfilter Heap OOB Write Enables Privilege Escalation (CVE-2021-22555) CVE-2021-22555 is a heap out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in the netfilter x_tables code (net/netfilter/x_tables.c) of the Linux kernel, a flaw present since version v2.6.19-rc1. A local attacker can trigger the heap memory corruption through user namespaces, meaning even unprivileged users, such as workloads running inside containers, can reach the vulnerable code path. Successful exploitation lets the attacker gain elevated kernel-level privileges, typically fully escaping a container, or crash the system in a denial of service. Affected users are essentially any Linux deployment on kernels in the affected range (distributions, cloud servers, container hosts), and CISA's product mapping additionally covers NetApp firmware for its c400/c250, H300S/H410S/H410C/H500S/H700S, FAS 8300/8700 and AFF A400 systems plus Brocade Fabric OS. The flaw has public proof-of-concept exploits (including Google security research), a high 78.7% EPSS exploitation probability over 30 days, and CISA added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2025-10-06, confirming exploitation in the wild. Do: Upgrade Linux kernels to patched versions from your distribution and apply vendor live patches where offered (Ubuntu Kernel Live Patch notices LSN-0080/0081/0083 are referenced in public advisories), and install the corresponding NetApp and Brocade firmware updates for the listed systems. Where patching must wait, restrict creation of unprivileged user namespaces and limit unprivileged users' ability to configure netfilter rules. As a CISA KEV entry, federal agencies must remediate per BOD 22-01 by the catalog due date. | 7.8 | 79% | KEV PoC ×5 |
| massbillions of devices (Linux kernel runs on most servers, cloud instances, container hosts, Android devices and embedded systems) | |
| CVE-2022-0847 | Local Privilege Escalation ('Dirty Pipe') in the Linux Kernel CVE-2022-0847, widely known as 'Dirty Pipe,' is a privilege escalation flaw in the Linux kernel caused by improper initialization of the 'flags' member of the new pipe buffer structure in the copy_page_to_iter_pipe and push_pipe functions, allowing stale flag values to persist (CWE-665). An unprivileged local user can trigger the flaw by writing through a pipe into the page cache of files they can read, overwriting the contents of otherwise read-only files. This enables tampering with privileged files — for example, hijacking SUID binaries per the public proof-of-concepts — to escalate privileges to root on the local system. Affected products include the Linux kernel as tracked by CISA, with downstream distribution and appliance vendors Fedora, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (including EUS, IBM Z, Power little-endian, and Real Time/NFV variants), oVirt, NetApp, Siemens, and SonicWall. Exploitation is confirmed in the wild: the flaw is on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-04-25), carries an 89.7% EPSS probability of exploitation within 30 days, and multiple public proof-of-concept exploits are available. Do: Apply vendor-supplied fixed kernel updates immediately per the CISA KEV required action, including patches from Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (all listed variants) and from oVirt, NetApp, Siemens, and SonicWall appliances or products that embed affected kernels; verify the running kernel version on hosts, container hosts, and appliances and reboot into the patched kernel. There is no complete workaround — the kernel itself must be patched — so prioritize multi-user servers, systems running untrusted code or containers, and internet-exposed appliances, since any local account can gain root. | 7.8 | 90% | KEV PoC ×4 |
| mass≈1 billion+ Linux-based systems (servers, cloud VMs, Android/embedded devices) potentially vulnerable on unpatched kernels | |
| CVE-2023-32233 | In the Linux kernel through 6.3.1, a use-after-free in Netfilter nf_tables when processing batch requests can be abused to perform arbitrary read and write oper In the Linux kernel through 6.3.1, a use-after-free in Netfilter nf_tables when processing batch requests can be abused to perform arbitrary read and write operations on kernel memory. Unprivileged local users can obtain root privileges. This occurs because anonymous sets are mishandled. NVD description · AI analysis pending | 7.8 | 13% |
| — | ||
| CVE-2023-38831 | Code Execution in RARLAB WinRAR via Crafted ZIP File/Folder Name Confusion RARLAB WinRAR before 6.23 mishandles ZIP archives that contain a benign file (such as a JPG) alongside a folder with the same name, causing the folder's contents - which can include malicious executable files - to be processed when the user merely attempts to view the benign file. By sending a crafted ZIP archive, an attacker gains arbitrary code execution on the victim's machine with the user's privileges. Because the flaw is local (AV:L) and requires user interaction, risk is limited to Windows systems running an unpatched copy of WinRAR, while machines without the tool are unaffected. The bug was actively exploited in the wild from April through October 2023, including by government-backed actors (APT28), SideCopy attacks on Indian government entities, ransomware operations, and trading-account theft campaigns, and it was added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2023-08-24. Do: Upgrade all Windows systems running WinRAR to version 6.23 or later, which fixes this flaw; if patching is not immediately possible, treat ZIP files from untrusted sources with caution and check archives for duplicate file/folder names before opening. Given KEV listing with known ransomware use and public proof-of-concept exploits, hunt for compromise by reviewing whether unexpected executables or scripts ran when ZIP archives were opened, and apply vendor mitigations per CISA's required action or discontinue use if mitigations are unavailable. | 7.8 | 98% | KEV ransomware PoC ×4 |
| masshundreds of millions of users/installations worldwide (WinRAR is one of the most widely installed Windows archive utilities) | |
| CVE-2025-6218 | Directory Traversal RCE in RARLAB WinRAR RARLAB WinRAR contains a directory traversal flaw (CWE-22) in its handling of file paths within archive files, allowing a crafted archive path to traverse to unintended directories during extraction. Exploitation requires user interaction: the target must open a malicious file (e.g., a booby-trapped archive) or visit a malicious page. A successful attacker executes arbitrary code in the context of the current user, yielding full high-impact code execution on the endpoint (CVSS 3.0: 7.8, local attack vector with required user interaction). Any installation running an affected version of RARLAB WinRAR is exposed; the specific affected version range is not stated in the source data, so defenders should confirm against RARLAB's advisory. The flaw is being actively exploited: CISA added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2025-12-09, Google warned of active exploitation, public reporting ties the campaign to APT-C-08 and at least one other actor group, and EPSS stands at 90.5%. Do: Update WinRAR to the latest vendor release that addresses CVE-2025-6218 per RARLAB's advisory (the fixed version number is not provided in the source data), and treat this as urgent given the KEV listing and 90.5% EPSS. Warn users not to open archives from untrusted or unexpected sources, and inspect email-borne .rar/.zip attachments. Hunt for unusual child processes or file writes outside expected directories following archive extraction, and note U.S. federal civilian agencies must apply mitigations under BOD 22-01. | 7.8 | 91% | KEV PoC ×2 |
| masshundreds of millions of users/installations worldwide | |
| CVE-2025-8088 | WinRAR Path Traversal (CVE-2025-8088) Enables Arbitrary Code Execution A path traversal flaw (CWE-35) in the Windows version of WinRAR allows attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by delivering a specially crafted archive file that writes outside the expected location when it is opened or processed. Because the CVSS 4.0 vector indicates a local attack requiring user interaction, victims are typically infected by extracting or previewing a malicious archive received via phishing, a malicious download, or another delivery channel. A successful attacker gains the privileges of the user running WinRAR, providing an initial foothold that has been used for both espionage and ransomware operations. Anyone running the Windows version of WinRAR — one of the most widely deployed Windows desktop utilities — is affected, and CPE data additionally lists dtSearch as an affected vendor. Exploitation is confirmed in the wild by nation-state actors (e.g., the China-linked Amaranth-Dragon group per related reporting) and criminal actors including ransomware operators; the flaw was added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2025-08-12 and carries a near-maximal 94.6% EPSS score. Do: Update WinRAR to the latest patched release from RARLAB on all Windows endpoints, prioritizing remediation per CISA KEV and BOD 22-01 requirements, and verify that dtSearch deployments bundling the affected component are also updated. Because exploitation requires a user to open or extract a crafted archive, warn users to treat unexpected archive files delivered by email or download with suspicion. Given confirmed ransomware use, hunt across user workstations — not just exposed servers — for suspicious archive-based infections and confirm the patched WinRAR version is installed. | 8.4 | 95% | KEV ransomware |
| masshundreds of millions of Windows users/devices (est.; RARLAB has historically claimed user counts in the hundreds of millions) |
Full article2,232 words · extracted from securelist.com · click to collapse
The fourth quarter of 2025 went down as one of the most intense periods on record for high-profile, critical vulnerability disclosures, hitting popular libraries and mainstream applications. Several of these vulnerabilities were picked up by attackers and exploited in the wild almost immediately.
In this report, we dive into the statistics on published vulnerabilities and exploits, as well as the known vulnerabilities leveraged with popular C2 frameworks throughout Q4 2025.
Statistics on registered vulnerabilities
This section contains statistics on registered vulnerabilities. The data is taken from cve.org.
Let’s take a look at the number of registered CVEs for each month over the last five years, up to and including the end of 2025. As predicted in our last report, Q4 saw a higher number of registered vulnerabilities than the same period in 2024, and the year-end totals also cleared the bar set the previous year.
Total published vulnerabilities by month from 2021 through 2025 (download)
Now, let’s look at the number of new critical vulnerabilities (CVSS > 8.9) for that same period.
Total number of published critical vulnerabilities by month from 2021 to 2025< (download)
The graph shows that the volume of critical vulnerabilities remains quite substantial; however, in the second half of the year, we saw those numbers dip back down to levels seen in 2023. This was due to vulnerability churn: a handful of published security issues were revoked. The widespread adoption of secure development practices and the move toward safer languages also pushed those numbers down, though even that couldn’t stop the overall flood of vulnerabilities.
Exploitation statistics
This section contains statistics on the use of exploits in Q4 2025. The data is based on open sources and our telemetry.
Windows and Linux vulnerability exploitation
In Q4 2025, the most prevalent exploits targeted the exact same vulnerabilities that dominated the threat landscape throughout the rest of the year. These were exploits targeting Microsoft Office products with unpatched security flaws.
Kaspersky solutions detected the most exploits on the Windows platform for the following vulnerabilities:
- CVE-2018-0802: a remote code execution vulnerability in Equation Editor.
- CVE-2017-11882: another remote code execution vulnerability, also affecting Equation Editor.
- CVE-2017-0199: a vulnerability in Microsoft Office and WordPad that allows an attacker to assume control of the system.
The list has remained unchanged for years.
We also see that attackers continue to adapt exploits for directory traversal vulnerabilities (CWE-35) when unpacking archives in WinRAR. They are being heavily leveraged to gain initial access via malicious archives on the Windows operating system:
- CVE-2023-38831: a vulnerability stemming from the improper handling of objects within an archive.
- CVE-2025-6218 (formerly ZDI-CAN-27198): a vulnerability that enables an attacker to specify a relative path and extract files into an arbitrary directory. This can lead to arbitrary code execution. We covered this vulnerability in detail in our Q2 2025 report.
- CVE-2025-8088: a vulnerability we analyzed in our previous report, analogous to CVE-2025-6218. The attackers used NTFS streams to circumvent controls on the directory into which files were being unpacked.
As in the previous quarter, we see a rise in the use of archiver exploits, with fresh vulnerabilities increasingly appearing in attacks.
Below are the exploit detection trends for Windows users over the last two years.
Dynamics of the number of Windows users encountering exploits, Q1 2024 – Q4 2025. The number of users who encountered exploits in Q1 2024 is taken as 100% (download)
The vulnerabilities listed here can be used to gain initial access to a vulnerable system. This highlights the critical importance of timely security updates for all affected software.
On Linux-based devices, the most frequently detected exploits targeted the following vulnerabilities:
- CVE-2022-0847, also known as Dirty Pipe: a vulnerability that allows privilege escalation and enables attackers to take control of running applications.
- CVE-2019-13272: a vulnerability caused by improper handling of privilege inheritance, which can be exploited to achieve privilege escalation.
- CVE-2021-22555: a heap overflow vulnerability in the Netfilter kernel subsystem.
- CVE-2023-32233: another vulnerability in the Netfilter subsystem that creates a use-after-free condition, allowing for privilege escalation due to the improper handling of network requests.
Dynamics of the number of Linux users encountering exploits, Q1 2024 – Q4 2025. The number of users who encountered exploits in Q1 2024 is taken as 100% (download)
We are seeing a massive surge in Linux-based exploit attempts: in Q4, the number of affected users doubled compared to Q3. Our statistics show that the final quarter of the year accounted for more than half of all Linux exploit attacks recorded for the entire year. This surge is primarily driven by the rapidly growing number of Linux-based consumer devices. This trend naturally attracts the attention of threat actors, making the installation of security patches critically important.
Most common published exploits
The distribution of published exploits by software type in Q4 2025 largely mirrors the patterns observed in the previous quarter. The majority of exploits we investigate through our monitoring of public research, news, and PoCs continue to target vulnerabilities within operating systems.
Distribution of published exploits by platform, Q1 2025 (download)
Distribution of published exploits by platform, Q2 2025 (download)
Distribution of published exploits by platform, Q3 2025 (download)
Distribution of published exploits by platform, Q4 2025 (download)
In Q4 2025, no public exploits for Microsoft Office products emerged; the bulk of the vulnerabilities were issues discovered in system components. When calculating our statistics, we placed these in the OS category.
Vulnerability exploitation in APT attacks
We analyzed which vulnerabilities were utilized in APT attacks during Q4 2025. The following rankings draw on our telemetry, research, and open-source data.
TOP 10 vulnerabilities exploited in APT attacks, Q4 2025 (download)
In Q4 2025, APT attacks most frequently exploited fresh vulnerabilities published within the last six months. We believe that these CVEs will remain favorites among attackers for a long time, as fixing them may require significant structural changes to the vulnerable applications or the user’s system. Often, replacing or updating the affected components requires a significant amount of resources. Consequently, the probability of an attack through such vulnerabilities may persist. Some of these new vulnerabilities are likely to become frequent tools for lateral movement within user infrastructure, as the corresponding security flaws have been discovered in network services that are accessible without authentication. This heavy exploitation of very recently registered vulnerabilities highlights the ability of threat actors to rapidly implement new techniques and adapt old ones for their attacks. Therefore, we strongly recommend applying the security patches provided by vendors.
C2 frameworks
In this section, we will look at the most popular C2 frameworks used by threat actors and analyze the vulnerabilities whose exploits interacted with C2 agents in APT attacks.
The chart below shows the frequency of known C2 framework usage in attacks against users during Q4 2025, according to open sources.
TOP 10 C2 frameworks used by APTs to compromise user systems in Q4 2025 (download)
Despite the significant footprints it can leave when used in its default configuration, Sliver continues to hold the top spot among the most common C2 frameworks in our Q4 2025 analysis. Mythic and Havoc were second and third, respectively. After reviewing open sources and analyzing malicious C2 agent samples that contained exploits, we found that the following vulnerabilities were used in APT attacks involving the C2 frameworks mentioned above:
- CVE-2025-55182: a React2Shell vulnerability in React Server Components that allows an unauthenticated user to send commands directly to the server and execute them from RAM.
- CVE-2023-36884: a vulnerability in the Windows Search component that allows the execution of commands on a system, bypassing security mechanisms built into Microsoft Office applications.
- CVE-2025-53770: a critical insecure deserialization vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint that allows an unauthenticated user to execute commands on the server.
- CVE-2020-1472, also known as Zerologon, allows for compromising a vulnerable domain controller and executing commands as a privileged user.
- CVE-2021-34527, also known as PrintNightmare, exploits flaws in the Windows print spooler subsystem, enabling remote access to a vulnerable OS and high-privilege command execution.
- CVE-2025-8088 and CVE-2025-6218 are similar directory-traversal vulnerabilities that allow extracting files from an archive to a predefined path without the archiving utility notifying the user.
The set of vulnerabilities described above suggests that attackers have been using them for initial access and early-stage maneuvers in vulnerable systems to create a springboard for deploying a C2 agent. The list of vulnerabilities includes both zero-days and well-known, established security issues.
Notable vulnerabilities
This section highlights the most noteworthy vulnerabilities that were publicly disclosed in Q4 2025 and have a publicly available description.
React2Shell (CVE-2025-55182): a vulnerability in React Server Components
We typically describe vulnerabilities affecting a specific application. CVE-2025-55182 stood out as an exception, as it was discovered in React, a library primarily used for building web applications. This means that exploiting the vulnerability could potentially disrupt a vast number of applications that rely on the library. The vulnerability itself lies in the interaction mechanism between the client and server components, which is built on sending serialized objects. If an attacker sends serialized data containing malicious functionality, they can execute JavaScript commands directly on the server, bypassing all client-side request validation. Technical details about this vulnerability and an example of how Kaspersky solutions detect it can be found in our article.
CVE-2025-54100: command injection during the execution of curl (Invoke-WebRequest)
This vulnerability represents a data-handling flaw that occurs when retrieving information from a remote server: when executing the curl or Invoke-WebRequest command, Windows launches Internet Explorer in the background. This can lead to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack.
CVE-2025-11001: a vulnerability in 7-Zip
This vulnerability reinforces the trend of exploiting security flaws found in file archivers. The core of CVE-2025-11001 lies in the incorrect handling of symbolic links. An attacker can craft an archive so that when it is extracted into an arbitrary directory, its contents end up in the location pointed to by a symbolic link. The likelihood of exploiting this vulnerability is significantly reduced because utilizing such functionality requires the user opening the archive to possess system administrator privileges.
This vulnerability was associated with a wave of misleading news reports claiming it was being used in real-world attacks against end users. This misconception stemmed from an error in the security bulletin.
RediShell (CVE-2025-49844): a vulnerability in Redis
The year 2025 saw a surge in high-profile vulnerabilities, several of which were significant enough to earn a unique nickname. This was the case with CVE-2025-49844, also known as RediShell, which was unveiled during a hacking competition. This vulnerability is a use-after-free issue related to how the load command functions within Lua interpreter scripts. To execute the attack, an attacker needs to prepare a malicious script and load it into the interpreter.
As with any named vulnerability, RediShell was immediately weaponized by threat actors and spammers, albeit in a somewhat unconventional manner. Because technical details were initially scarce following its disclosure, the internet was flooded with fake PoC exploits and scanners claiming to test for the vulnerability. In the best-case scenario, these tools were non-functional; in the worst, they infected the system. Notably, these fraudulent projects were frequently generated using LLMs. They followed a standardized template and often cross-referenced source code from other identical fake repositories.
CVE-2025-24990: a vulnerability in the ltmdm64.sys driver
Driver vulnerabilities are often discovered in legitimate third-party applications that have been part of the official OS distribution for a long time. Thus, CVE-2025-24990 has existed within code shipped by Microsoft throughout nearly the entire history of Windows. The vulnerable driver has been shipped since at least Windows 7 as a third-party driver for Agere Modem. According to Microsoft, this driver is no longer supported and, following the discovery of the flaw, was removed from the OS distribution entirely.
The vulnerability itself is straightforward: insecure handling of IOCTL codes leading to a null pointer dereference. Successful exploitation can lead to arbitrary command execution or a system crash resulting in a blue screen of death (BSOD) on modern systems.
CVE-2025-59287: a vulnerability in Windows Server Update Services (WSUS)
CVE-2025-59287 represents a textbook case of insecure deserialization. Exploitation is possible without any form of authentication; due to its ease of use, this vulnerability rapidly gained traction among threat actors. Technical details and detection methodologies for our product suite have been covered in our previous advisories.
Conclusion and advice
In Q4 2025, the rate of vulnerability registration has shown no signs of slowing down. Consequently, consistent monitoring and the timely application of security patches have become more critical than ever. To ensure resilient defense, it is vital to regularly assess and remediate known vulnerabilities while implementing technology designed to mitigate the impact of potential exploits.
Continuous monitoring of infrastructure, including the network perimeter, allows for the timely identification of threats and prevents them from escalating. Effective security also demands tracking the current threat landscape and applying preventative measures to minimize risks associated with system flaws. Kaspersky Next serves as a reliable partner in this process, providing real-time identification and detailed mapping of vulnerabilities within the environment.
Securing the workplace remains a top priority. Protecting corporate devices requires the adoption of solutions capable of blocking malware and preventing it from spreading. Beyond basic measures, organizations should implement adaptive systems that allow for the rapid deployment of security updates and the automation of patch management workflows.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://securelist.com/vulnerabilities-and-exploits-in-q4-2025/119105/