Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Optimizing Credential Blast Radius Through Trust Boundaries and Delegation Under Post-Quantum Authentication Costs

arXiv cs.CRby Pauli Taipale ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Academic paper models credential blast radius optimization across trust domains under post-quantum latency costs, cutting expected impact by up to 36%.

The paper formulates the joint selection of trust domains and credential-derivation structures under policy and latency constraints as an NP-hard optimization problem, showing the scalarized two-domain direct-issuance case reduces to a weighted minimum cut. In 195 of 230 exhaustive synthetic comparisons, joint optimization produced lower credential blast radius than choosing boundaries first, especially under chained delegation. A trace-derived replay using measured post-quantum authentication costs found the best design reduced expected impact by up to 36% relative to a single domain within the latency budget.

Key facts
  • Frames credential blast radius as weighted service impact after issuer compromise
  • Joint optimization beats boundary-first design in 195 of 230 synthetic comparisons
  • Two-domain scalarized direct issuance reduces to weighted minimum cut
  • Uses measured post-quantum crossing costs in a trace-derived replay
  • Best design cut expected impact by up to 36% within latency budget
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Partitioning interacting services into independently rooted trust domains limits issuer-compromise reach while increasing calls across trust boundaries. Post-quantum replacements for public-key authentication and key-establishment mechanisms can increase crossing latency on constrained or lossy paths.

arXiv cs.CR

By Pauli Taipale · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.