RDP and VPN use soars, increasing enterprise cyber risk
Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →
| CVE | Vulnerability | CVSS | EPSS | Flags | Affected | Exposure | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-13379 | Unauthenticated Path Traversal in Fortinet FortiOS SSL VPN CVE-2018-13379 is a path traversal flaw (CWE-22) in the Fortinet FortiOS SSL VPN web portal that allows an unauthenticated attacker to download FortiOS system files via specially crafted HTTP resource requests. By traversing directories through crafted requests to the exposed web portal, the attacker can retrieve sensitive files, a technique publicly documented as yielding the SSL VPN session file containing usernames and passwords in plaintext. Any organization running the SSL VPN web portal on a FortiGate appliance is affected, and risk is highest where the portal is directly reachable from the internet. The flaw is confirmed in the wild: it was added to the CISA KEV catalog on 2021-11-03 with known ransomware use, and EPSS assigns it a 100% probability of exploitation within 30 days. No public PoC is listed in the provided data, but credential theft tied to this bug has been widely reused by threat actors. Do: Apply the patched FortiOS release per Fortinet's vendor advisory immediately, as this is a CISA KEV required action; if the fixed version is not known from this data, follow Fortinet's FG-IR-18-384 advisory for the correct upgrade path. Rotate SSL VPN credentials and review VPN access logs for path-traversal requests, since successful exploitation exposes plaintext session credentials, and restrict SSL VPN portal exposure to trusted sources where possible. | 9.8 | 100% | KEV ransomware |
| mass≈500,000 internet-exposed FortiOS SSL VPN portals (Fortinet cited ~480,000 affected devices) | |
| CVE-2019-11510 | Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Read in Ivanti Pulse Connect Secure VPN Ivanti Pulse Connect Secure, an enterprise SSL VPN appliance, contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability (CWE-22, path traversal) that requires no authentication. An unauthenticated remote attacker with network access to the appliance over HTTPS can send a specially crafted URI containing traversal sequences to read arbitrary files from the device. The attacker gains access to sensitive appliance files, potentially including configuration or credential material useful for further compromise, and CISA records known ransomware use of this flaw. Any organization running Pulse Connect Secure, especially gateways exposed to the internet for remote access, is affected. Exploitation is established: CISA added the flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2021-11-03 with known ransomware use, EPSS assigns a 100% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, and no public PoC is known. Do: Apply updates per Ivanti's instructions, the required action in the CISA KEV entry, prioritizing internet-facing Pulse Connect Secure gateways, and consult the vendor advisory for the applicable fixed release since no version range is provided here. Where patching is not immediate, restrict HTTPS access to the appliance and hunt for signs of exploitation (unexpected file reads, anomalous VPN logins or sessions, and follow-on ransomware activity), as CISA reports known ransomware use. | 10.0 | 100% | KEV ransomware PoC ×2 |
| largeTens of thousands of internet-exposed gateways (order of 10,000-100,000 systems; each typically serves hundreds of VPN users, so potentially millions of users) | |
| CVE-2019-1573 | GlobalProtect Agent 4.1.0 for Windows and GlobalProtect Agent 4.1.10 and earlier for macOS may allow a local authenticated attacker who has compromised the end- GlobalProtect Agent 4.1.0 for Windows and GlobalProtect Agent 4.1.10 and earlier for macOS may allow a local authenticated attacker who has compromised the end-user account and gained the ability to inspect memory, to access authentication and/or session tokens and replay them to spoof the VPN session and gain access as the user. NVD description · AI analysis pending | 2.5 | <1% |
| — |
Full article340 words · extracted from helpnetsecurity.com · click to collapse
As COVID-19 slowly spread across the globe, consumer demand for commercial virtual private network (VPN) services has soared – both for security reasons and for bypassing geo-blocking of (streaming) content. Not unexpectedly, enterprise VPN use has also greatly increased, and so has the use of the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), a popular and common means for remotely managing a computer over a network connection.

Increased enterprise RDP and VPN use
Shodan creator John Matherly has pulled old and new data regarding devices exposing RDP and VPN protocols and ports to the Internet and has confirmed that:
- The number of devices exposing RDP to the internet on standard ports (3389) has grown by 41.5 percent over the past month
- The number of devices exposing RDP to the internet on non-standard but often used alternate ports (3388) has grown by 36.8 percent over the same period
- The number of servers running VPN protocols (IKE, PPTP, etc.) on different ports has jumped from nearly 7.5 million to nearly 10 million (by a third).
With the increased usage of these services comes an increase risk of compromise, though.
Increased risk
“[RDP] has a history of security issues and generally shouldn’t be publicly accessible without any other protections (ex. firewall whitelist, 2FA),” Matherly noted.
While helpful for allowing remote users to securely connect to corporate applications and resources, the VPNs set up by organizations are not immune to attack and compromise via known and unknown vulnerabilities, both on the client and server side.
Among the more recent examples are:
- CVE-2019-1573, a vulnerability that made a variety of VPN applications store the authentication and session cookies insecurely in memory and/or log files
- CVE-2019-11510, an arbitrary file reading vulnerability affecting Pulse Connect Secure SSL VPN installations
- CVE-2018-13379, a path traversal flaw in the FortiOS SSL VPN web portal
The latter two can be exploited remotely by sending a specially crafted HTTPS request, don’t require authentication, and allow attackers to download files/extract sensitive information from the vulnerable servers. They have also been actively exploited by attackers.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2020/03/30/enterprise-vpn-use/