Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Exploit / PoChighExploited in the wild

Cisco ASA and FTD DoS Vulnerability Exploited in the Wild (CVE-2026-20349)

Qualys ThreatPROTECTby Diksha Ojha ()1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Cisco patched actively exploited high-severity flaw CVE-2026-20349 in ASA and FTD SSL VPN services, allowing unauthenticated remote denial-of-service attacks.

Cisco released a security advisory addressing CVE-2026-20349, a high-severity vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA and FTD Software. Successful exploitation by an unauthenticated remote attacker can cause affected devices to crash or reload, causing denial of service. The vulnerability is being exploited in the wild, and patches are available; organizations with internet-exposed ASA/FTD VPN endpoints should prioritize updating.

Key facts
  • CVE-2026-20349 affects Cisco ASA and FTD SSL VPN service
  • Unauthenticated remote attackers can cause device DoS
  • Cisco confirms exploitation in the wild
  • Patches released; admins should update exposed devices
Analyze CVE-2026-20349 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-20349
Unauthenticated Remote DoS in Cisco ASA/FTD SSL VPN Service
8.61%KEVPoC
KEV

From the original article

Cisco released a security advisory to address a high-severity vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-20349. The vulnerability impacts the Remote Access SSL VPN service for Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the affected device …

Qualys ThreatPROTECT

By Diksha Ojha · threatprotect.qualys.com

Read the full article at Qualys ThreatPROTECT

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.