Spamming the spammers: good idea or just misguided vigilantism?

There’s been a lot of talk recently about the screensaver Lycos made available earlier this week, which is designed to fight back at spammers. The screensaver, called ‘Make Love Not Spam’, responds to spam by sending a request to view the spam source site: where lots of such requests are sent simultaneously [that is, in response to spam], the source site slows down. The idea is to increase the costs incurred by spammers so that it’s no longer profitable to distribute spam.

Nobody likes spam, of course, except those who make money from it. But this approach raises some serious questions.

1. How does this differ, in principle, from a DDoS [Distributed Denial of Service] attack? Surely the same practice is being used, even if no site is actually taken down.
2. What if the traffic generated does take down a site by mistake?
3. What if the ‘slow down’ targets the wrong site by mistake?
4. What about the traffic generated by the screensaver? While individual users may chose to run the screensaver, a system administrator might be less than happy about corporate bandwidth being used for this purpose.

The bottom line, for us, is that while we’d like to see spammers stopped, the end does not justify the means.

Kaspersky researchers have discovered new Mirage Kitten attacks using previously undocumented malware families: NodeRabbit in Node.js and PollCat in JavaScript.

Our experts discovered a new CoolClient backdoor variant with a kernel-mode rootkit driver that hides malicious processes, files, and network connections from security tools and threat analysts.

Kaspersky experts break down a new Armored Likho campaign that poses as a fundraising efforts and delivers a new Still Toolkit aimed at stealing Telegram data and eavesdropping on victims.

Kaspersky researchers reveal previously undocumented malware attributed to Mirage Kitten (UNC1549, Smoke Sandstorm, Nimbus Manticore): NightLedger backdoor, ArcBridge, and BridgeHead tunneling tools.