ZeroHour
CyberScooppublished ()ingested @CyberScoopNews

House panel moves bill that adds AI systems to National Vulnerability Database

criticalVulnerability exploited in the wildimportance 60
Full article1,013 words · extracted from cyberscoop.com · click to collapse
Skip to main content

Get our latest cybersecurity news first on Google.

Click here!

The AI Incident Reporting and Security Enhancement Act would put NIST in charge of setting up a vulnerability reporting process for AI systems.

Rep. Deborah Ross, D-N.C., speaks during a press conference in Washington, D.C., on June 3, 2024. Legislation from Ross and two colleagues to add AI systems to the National Vulnerability Database cleared a House panel on Sept. 25, 2024. (Photo by ALLISON BAILEY/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

A bill that would push the National Institute of Standards and Technology to set up a formal process for reporting security vulnerabilities in AI systems sailed through a House committee Wednesday.

The AI Incident Reporting and Security Enhancement Act, introduced by Reps. Deborah Ross, D-N.C., Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., and Don Beyer, D-Va., was approved via voice vote by the House Science, Space and Technology Committee.

It would direct NIST to add AI systems to the National Vulnerability Database, the federal government’s centralized repository for tracking cybersecurity vulnerabilities in software and hardware. It would also require the agency to consult with other federal agencies, like the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the private sector, standards organizations and civil society groups to establish common definitions, terminology and standardized reporting rules for AI security incidents.

Ross noted that the introduction of companion legislation in May from Sens. Mark Warner, D-Va., and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., means that “we have friends in the Senate” who can help pass the bill into law.

However, the bill includes language specifying that these actions are “subject to the availability of appropriations,” and Ross acknowledged “significant funding and scaling challenges that NIST has with the NVD” under its existing workload.

NIST has had well-established challenges managing the ballooning number of vulnerabilities it is already responsible for tracking and analyzing. In February, the agency temporarily stopped enriching data around reported security vulnerabilities — a process where agency analysts tag and connect specific vulnerability entries to other relevant public information. Cybersecurity practitioners have said NIST’s enrichment work adds invaluable context that organizations use to address existing vulnerabilities.

In March, Tanya Brewer, who manages NIST’s NVD program, cited budget cuts, flat staff growth and an exponential increase in incoming email traffic related to the database over the past four years as reasons for the pause.  

“My colleagues and I on this committee are actively exploring solutions to help NIST address this problem and get the money,” Ross said.

Obernolte referenced a number of high-profile cybersecurity incidents over the past three years, including the 2021 Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, the Change Healthcare hack and a CrowdStrike bug that crashed systems across the globe as examples of how software glitches and vulnerabilities can severely disrupt the flow of supply chains.

This threat “is especially true with AI systems, since they tend to be not only less deterministic but also less understood,” he said, adding that he intends to fight for the bill to get a full House vote later this year.

Although the bill passed by voice vote, some members raised concerns. Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., signaled his support for the underlying bill but said that more work is needed to define terms like “substantial artificial intelligence security incident” and “intelligence incident” and measures to ensure that civil society groups invited to provide input don’t include foreign standards organizations from China and other adversarial nations.

Such scoping is particularly necessary, Posey said, in light of a recent Supreme Court ruling that overturned the so-called “Chevron doctrine,” a legal precedent whereby courts defer to federal agencies to interpret how to implement laws passed by Congress.  

“These really jumped out at me post-Chevron,” Posey said. “That elected people should really decide the spectrum at which we want them to operate and not let the bureaucracy take off again with a free wheel to do whatever they want.”

More Scoops

(NIST building / CC2.0)

NIST wants to overhaul its vulnerability database for the AI age

NIST is seeking public input to modernize the National Vulnerability Database to keep pace with AI-driven cyber threats and machine-scale security data.

United States National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross (2nd-L) accompanied by United States Chief Technology Officer Dr. Ethan Klein (L), White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Michael Kratsios (3rd-L), U.S. President Donald Trump (R), and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick (2nd-R), speaks during an event in the Oval Office of the White House on June 22, 2026 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

National cyber director lays out White House plans to secure AI without writing new rules

Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., center, and ranking member Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., right, conduct the House Select Intelligence Committee hearing titled “Worldwide Threats Assessment,” in Longworth building on March 26, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

House intel bill includes provisions on state and local threat intelligence, election security, AI

Latest Podcasts

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://cyberscoop.com/nist-artificial-intelligence-vulnerability-reporting-congress/