Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Nearly Tight Rademacher Bounds for Sparsely Activated Neural Networks

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Xiaoyu Li ()1 min read2 · 2 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Theory paper derives nearly tight Rademacher complexity bounds for sparsely activated one-hidden-layer ReLU networks.

Building on Awasthi et al. (COLT 2024), the authors bound statistical complexity for networks where each input activates at most k of s hidden units. A support-preserving cover and normalized chaining argument remove the explicit dimension factor, with matching lower bounds up to logarithms. They also derive agnostic minimax excess-risk bounds of order min{1, sqrt(s/(km))} for a normalized bounded loss and show bias bounds comparable to WR restore worst-case rates even on domains where sparsity holds globally.

Key facts
  • Upper bound CWR*min{k, sqrt(sk/m)}*log^1.5(2m)+kB/sqrt(m) for width-s networks with k active units
  • Lower bounds on i.i.d. marginals match the upper bound up to logarithmic factors
  • Zero-bias ball-sparse networks retain complexity O(kWR/sqrt(m)); large biases restore worst-case rate
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

An input may activate few hidden units even when different inputs collectively use an entire network. We study the statistical complexity of this input-dependent sparsity in the one-hidden-layer ReLU model of Awasthi et al. (COLT 2024).

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Xiaoyu Li · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.