Quoting Boris Cherny
Anthropic's Boris Cherny says AI-generated production code needs a higher quality bar enforced with tests, fuzzers, and automated reviews.
In remarks quoted by Simon Willison, Anthropic's Boris Cherny argued that production code written by Claude should meet a higher quality bar than human-written code. He described guardrails at Anthropic including lint rules, extensive tests, Claude-driven end-to-end tests, daily Claude-powered fuzzers, and automated code and security reviews. He warned that without such controls AI-generated code can become hard to maintain.
- Anthropic runs guardrails on Claude-written code: lint rules, tests, e2e tests, daily fuzzers, automated reviews.
- Boris Cherny: without guardrails, AI-generated production code becomes hard to maintain down the line.
Production code written by Claude should have a higher bar than if it was written by a human. At Anthropic, we have many guardrails in place to make sure this is happening: lots of lint rules, lots of tests, Claude-driven end to end tests, Claude-powered fuzzers running daily, automated code reviews and security reviews, automated code refactoring, and so on. Without these, you can end up with a mess that is hard to maintain down the line. — Boris Cherny Tags: claude , ai , claude-code , llms , coding-agents , ai-assisted-programming , generative-ai , agentic-engineering , boris-cherny
This source does not provide full text. Read it at simonwillison.net.