ZeroHour
CyberScooppublished ()ingested @shanvav

Research outs poorly constructed disinfo campaign aimed at Hong Kong protests

criticalThreat actor exploited in the wildimportance 60
Full article1,055 words · extracted from cyberscoop.com · click to collapse
Skip to main content

Get our latest cybersecurity news first on Google.

Click here!

Hackers that appear to be acting in the interest of China’s government have been hijacking and using fake accounts on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, according to Graphika research.

hong kong protests
The campaign started up as the protests around Hong Kong's extradition gained steam. (Getty Images)

Hackers that appear to be acting in the interest of China’s government have been hijacking and using fake accounts on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to push narratives denigrating the Hong Kong protests, according to research from Graphika.

Named “Spamouflage Dragon,” the people behind the campaign attempted to avoid detection algorithms by posting a small amount of political content interspersed with higher volumes of spam, such as cat and landscape pictures, TikTok videos and sports content. Twitter and Facebook accounts in the spam network also have been interspersing political postings with inspirational quotes as well as food and travel content.

The sweeping, cross-platform campaign — which Graphika assesses is still active and is focused on promoting YouTube videos — appears to have been in operation for years, although it largely went silent in 2017. In June as the Hong Kong protests against China’s controversial extradition law gained traction, the spam network started up again, with accounts, pages and channels linking to content across the platforms.

Much of the messages have been critical of Hong Kong protesters while applauding Hong Kong police, according to Graphika.

But in contrast with some recent takedowns related to Hong Kong, this campaign does not appear to be linked with Beijing directly because the campaign seems to be very sloppily put together, according to Graphika. Although one of the channels in question had 1.6 million views, the campaign has been low-impact and has not demonstrated a sophisticated approach to generating engagement, Graphika assesses.

“Very few of the videos gained any degree of traction, and their viewing figures were extremely low,” Graphika researchers write. “Virtually no assets outside the [campaign] network reacted to, shared, or commented on any of the posts outside of its network.”

Efforts to conceal the operation

Some videos the spam network has posted have been so poorly programmed that they cut out after a few seconds, Graphika researchers note. In one instance, the spam network used a YouTube channel that had approximately 800,000 views — but for the most part it was just posting snippets of the U.K. television show, “The Good Life.”

The researchers suggest this kind of behavior is not the product of a social media information operation planned well in advance.

“Such repurposing is characteristic of hijacked or otherwise compromised assets that are sold on the black market, rather than dedicated assets created and run by a single operation; it indicates that [the campaign] prioritized the quick acquisition of assets over credible appearance,” the researchers write.

In at least one case, the campaign deviated from this blended posting behavior. A cluster of Twitter accounts centered around one account, which called itself Microview Review, tweeted only political content about Hong Kong and the protests.

Many of the older inauthentic Twitter accounts in this campaign, which date to 2012 and 2013, use stolen profile pictures. Other accounts have used more generic stock photos. In some cases, the campaign on Facebook appears to have tried using pages to appear as individual user accounts, possibly in an effort to avoid being flagged for takedowns.

Facebook removed all the associated accounts and Twitter took down at least some of these accounts this month, according to Graphika. When reached for comment Twitter did not say answer why it did so or if it took down every account flagged.

YouTube took down one prominent account in the second quarter of this year, but when reached for comment, a YouTube spokesperson neither said why it did so, nor did it answer whether the platform had taken down each account flagged.

More Scoops

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. holds a presidential campaign event on Aug. 30, 2023 in Brooklyn. A lawsuit from Kennedy challenges the government’s role in the removal of his own COVID-related posts. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Pair of lawsuits seek to revive fight over alleged censorship campaigns

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Murthy decision, legal experts see an uphill fight for conspiracy theorists.

The U.S. Supreme Court Building on Oct. 03, 2022. The high court will hear a landmark content moderation case involving Google this term. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Supreme Court poised to rewrite how social media confronts disinformation

From left, Chris Cox, chief product officer for Meta, Neal Mohan, chief product officer for YouTube, Vanessa Pappas, chief operating officer for TikTok, and Jay Sullivan, general manager of Bluebird Twitter, are sworn in during a US Senate Homeland Security hearing regarding social media’s impact on homeland security and disinformation on September 14, 2022. The executives are under fire for the vast amount of disinformation on their platforms, but they say if the Supreme Court upholds Texas and Florida laws seeking to ban them from curating content the problem will grow much worse. (Photo by STEFANI REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

Senators slam social media companies for failure to keep disinformation from going viral

Latest Podcasts

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://cyberscoop.com/hong-kong-disinfo-campaign-graphika/