Trump asks Supreme Court to let him curtail mail
Full article944 words · extracted from cyberscoop.com · click to collapse
Get our latest cybersecurity news first on Google.
In a Monday filing, the Justice Department said states sued before agencies even decided how the order would work.
Listen to this article
0:00
Learn more.
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Monday to let it enforce an executive order that would restrict mail-in voting, after a federal appeals court kept the order blocked in nearly half the states just months before the November midterm elections.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices that a Massachusetts federal judge acted too soon when she struck down key parts of the order, which blocked federal agencies from carrying it out in 23 states and the District of Columbia. Sauer said the order only directs agencies to study changes and has not yet produced a final rule, so no state has suffered harm.
“The district court preemptively decided that whatever the agencies may choose to do will necessarily be unlawful,” he wrote. He asked the court to pause the injunction while the case moves through the appeals court, and to grant an immediate stay in the meantime.
President Donald Trump signed an order in March that directs the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of confirmed U.S. citizens in each state and send them to election officials, along with directing the U.S. Postal Service to draft rules on mail-in and absentee ballots. California and 22 other Democratic-led states sued three days after Trump signed the order, arguing the Constitution gives states and Congress, not the president, power over elections.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani ruled in June that the administration lacked power to build its own citizen-voter database and that the Postal Service could not impose new rules on states’ mail ballots by itself. She also found the order’s enforcement language amounted to an improper threat against local election officials.
In Monday’s filing, the administration leaned on a 2020 case, Trump v. New York, in which the justices threw out a challenge to a separate Trump order on census counts because it was too soon to know how agencies would carry it out. Sauer argued the same logic applies here. The order tells agencies to act only “to the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law.” That wording, he said, means the Postal Service and Homeland Security could still drop or narrow the changes once they finish reviewing public comments and checking what the law allows.
The filing follows a string of fights over how the 2026 midterms will run. Earlier this month, Trump gave a prime-time address reviving his claim that the 2020 election was rigged, this time pointing to China, without providing any new evidence.
The filing also follows a Supreme Court ruling in late June that let states keep counting mail ballots that arrive after Election Day if postmarked on time.
You can read the full filing below.
More Scoops
Election official says Tina Peters would be consultant, won’t have access to election systems
Shasta County registrar Clint Curtis told CyberScoop he needs Peters to help manage the county’s 2026 elections and he’s not concerned about her past conviction.
SCOTUS tosses one of two injunctions against Trump USPS mail-in ballot rules
Postal Service moves to finalize mail ballot regs before SCOTUS ruling
Latest Podcasts
Government
FBI officials say AI is bolstering adversaries, emphasizing need to focus on cyber basics, patching
Feds accuse China of ‘systematic’ distillation of U.S. AI models
CIA’s Michael Ellis says cyber intelligence is changing how the agency operates
The G7 tells industry to hurry up and prep for post-quantum encryption
Technology
Threats
Chinese espionage groups swarm to exploit triple-link chain of zero-days
Microsoft discloses two actively exploited zero-days among 974 vulnerabilities
Russian national extradited to US for alleged involvement in bank-account takeover scheme
Attackers exploit zero-days in consistently besieged SonicWall product
Policy
‘Watershed 250’ test program in Texas looks to private sector for water cybersecurity help
Former sexual abuse victims say Grok used their images, videos to train deepfake capabilities
Bipartisan Senate bill aims to prepare energy sector for Q-Day
Lawmakers seek watchdog review of federal hacking of Americans
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://cyberscoop.com/trump-supreme-court-mail-in-voting/