Search: “mathematicians”

OpenAI just wants to win

OpenAI says roughly 10,000 agents and tens of millions in compute solved the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize problem in 88 hours, amid controversy.

OpenAI claims an advanced unreleased model, run with about 10,000 agents and tens of millions of dollars of compute for 88 hours, produced a solution to the Navier-Stokes problem, one of seven $1 million Millennium Prize problems set by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000. NYU professor Tristan Buckmaster, who was pursuing the problem with Anthropic researcher Levent Alpöge, accused OpenAI of racing his team and of possibly benefiting from his Codex prompts; OpenAI categorically denied both. OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck acknowledged offering Buckmaster compute and authorship arrangements, which Buckmaster characterized as a bribe, while many mathematicians expressed unease at OpenAI's competitive conduct.

The Verge · AI·Sep 12, 11:00 UTC · 5d agoAI industry 2 sources2

Leading mathematicians fear AI is making their field dumber, and warn the rest of us is next

Twenty-five Fields Medal winners, including Terence Tao, warn AI companies' benchmark-driven approach to mathematics is misaligned with the discipline's purpose of understanding.

In a joint statement, 25 Fields Medal winners including Terence Tao, Peter Scholze, and Maryna Viazovska warn that AI systems solving major open problems at machine speed undermine conceptual understanding and raise severe attribution and plagiarism questions. The statement lands amid a controversy accusing OpenAI of training math models to beat researchers to a rumored partial solution of a Millennium Prize Problem. The signatories describe a general threat to intellectual work across professions and call for urgent action by mathematicians, AI companies, and society, while not seeking a ban.

The Decoder·Sep 12, 08:28 UTC · 5d agoAI industry1

OpenAI’s feud with mathematicians is only escalating

25 Fields Medalists sign an open letter warning AI labs threaten math attribution; NYU's Tristan Buckmaster accuses OpenAI of pressuring him over collaborator credit.

Twenty-five Fields Medal-winning mathematicians signed an open letter arguing rushed AI proofs raise severe attribution and plagiarism questions and could destroy the culture of open research. NYU professor Tristan Buckmaster accused OpenAI of pressuring him not to credit an Anthropic-employed collaborator, and OpenAI withdrew sponsorship of a Caltech math event after researcher criticism. OpenAI's marathon-weekend proof remains unverified, and mathematicians fear their Codex usage may be fed into OpenAI's new models. The letter follows the June Leiden Declaration on LLM proofs.

TechCrunch · AI·updated Sep 12, 11:00 UTC · 5d ago·first Sep 11, 20:57 UTC · 5d agoAI industry 2 sources

Mathematicians want proof OpenAI didn’t use their work

Mathematician Andreas Thom publicly accused OpenAI of opacity over whether ChatGPT conversations contributed to its non-sofic groups mathematics result.

A second mathematician, Andreas Thom, accused OpenAI of 'dishonest' behavior and insufficient transparency about training data after OpenAI announced a result in non-sofic groups, Thom's area of expertise. He emailed OpenAI researchers Sébastien Bubeck and Mark Sellke asking whether his ChatGPT interactions fed training or reasoning, but found the answers did not rule out indirect use. The dispute follows Tristan Buckmaster's questions about the Millennium Prize Navier-Stokes solution, where OpenAI denied using specific user data but could not rule out de-identified usage data. Researchers told The Verge they worry such competition with AI labs will make mathematics more secretive.

The Verge · AI·Sep 10, 11:00 UTC · 7d agoAI industry

What OpenAI’s latest controversy tells us about the future of math

OpenAI says its agents solved the Navier–Stokes Millennium Problem using an internal model, amid uncredited-work accusations from mathematicians Buckmaster and Alpöge.

OpenAI announced that its AI agents produced a proof that the full Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness problem can break down, using an internal model that outperforms the recently released Astra. NYU's Tristan Buckmaster and Anthropic's Levent Alpöge had posted a proof for a simplified version the previous day after nearly a year of work with public OpenAI and Anthropic models. OpenAI denies using their transcripts or training on them; chief research officer Mark Chen reiterated the denial, and the company says it will not claim the $1 million Clay Mathematics Institute prize. The episode fuels debate over attribution norms as frontier labs concentrate mathematical breakthroughs.

MIT Technology Review · AI·Sep 9, 03:10 UTC · 8d agoAI industry

OpenAI researcher allegedly pressured mathematician to drop Anthropic co-author from math breakthrough paper

OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck allegedly pressured mathematician Tristan Buckmaster to drop his Anthropic co-author from an AI-assisted Navier-Stokes breakthrough paper.

Mathematician Tristan Buckmaster says OpenAI, after learning of his and Levent Alpöge's AI-assisted progress on the Navier-Stokes equations, pressed him to drop his Anthropic-employed co-author and dictated how any results would be announced. He says Sébastien Bubeck claimed an internal OpenAI model had produced a roughly 100-page proof for Navier-Stokes with forcing and allegedly told him 'Why would you ruin your career?' when he threatened to go public. Buckmaster published a public statement detailing the exchanges; OpenAI has not yet responded. The pair had worked with models including Claude and OpenAI Codex running GPT-5.6 Sol on the Clay Millennium Problem, which carries a $1 million prize.

The Decoder·Sep 8, 17:23 UTC · 8d agoAI industry1

OpenAI fought dirty on career-making math problem, says NYU mathematician

NYU mathematician Tristan Buckmaster alleges OpenAI learned of his team's Navier-Stokes approach and raced ahead using massive compute to claim a full proof first.

NYU mathematics professor Tristan Buckmaster and Anthropic mathematician Levent Alpöge announced preliminary proofs toward the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem, a $1 million Clay Millennium Prize problem, developed using OpenAI's Codex and Claude. They allege OpenAI learned of their progress and that an OpenAI team then used an 'insane amount of compute' to announce a full proof first. OpenAI research lead Sebastian Bubeck denies the claims as 'false and inflammatory'. Buckmaster also raised concerns that OpenAI could have learned from his Codex interactions, which the company may use for model training.

TechCrunch · AI·Sep 8, 17:32 UTC · 8d agoAI industry

GPT-6 Astra gives mathematicians a breather, and OpenAI says that's by design

OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra tops ulam.ai's ErdosBench math benchmark with 106 of 226 problems solved, while the company prioritizes recursive self-improvement over math optimization.

OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra leads ulam.ai's ErdosBench with a score of 3.23, solving 106 of 226 open math problems and fully solving 43, ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol's 78 solved problems. Chief scientist Jakub Pachocki said OpenAI deliberately avoided targeted math optimization to prioritize recursive self-improvement and automated alignment research. Benchmark developer Przemek Chojecki estimated the gain at 5-10% across tested math-research skills. Mathematician Terence Tao warned at the 2026 International Congress of Mathematicians that AI-generated proofs could shift mathematics from proof scarcity to proof overload.

The Decoder·updated Sep 12, 20:00 UTC · 4d ago·first Sep 10, 13:45 UTC · 7d agoAI industry 7 sources1

OpenAI’s sly mathematical breakthrough sends a chill through academia

OpenAI claims an unreleased model solved the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize problem in 88 hours using ~10,000 agents, sparking academic scooping controversy.

OpenAI announced that one of its unreleased internal models took 88 hours, running a swarm of roughly 10,000 AI agents, to produce a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize problem, a $1 million Clay Mathematics Institute challenge unsolved by humans for nearly 90 years. The announcement triggered allegations from NYU professor Tristan Buckmaster that OpenAI scooped his joint work with Anthropic researcher Levent Alpoge and questioned whether OpenAI accessed his Codex sessions; OpenAI denies using specific user data but concedes de-identified data influence cannot be ruled out. Critics say the rushed, reportedly million-dollar effort violates academic norms around trust and openness, potentially chilling collaboration in mathematics.

The Verge · AI·Sep 9, 21:16 UTC · 7d agoAI industry2

OpenAI's millennium proof dispute raises the question of whether researchers can trust AI labs

Mathematician Tristan Buckmaster accused OpenAI of pressuring him and possibly training on his drafts amid OpenAI's race to claim a Navier-Stokes millennium proof.

OpenAI published a blog post and Sam Altman defended the team behind its AI-generated proof of the Navier-Stokes Millennium Problem after mathematician Tristan Buckmaster accused the company of academic misconduct. Buckmaster and co-author Levent Alpöge, who works at Anthropic, allege OpenAI pressured Buckmaster, sidelined Alpöge, and may have trained on drafts they entered into OpenAI's systems. OpenAI acknowledges it cannot rule out that de-identified data from their product usage helped improve its models. Mathematician Terence Tao warned the episode could discourage researchers from sharing work, reversing centuries of open science.

The Decoder·Sep 9, 10:27 UTC · 8d agoAI industry1

Is OpenAI Taking Everyone for Fools?

OpenAI faces accusations it scooped NYU mathematicians' Navier-Stokes proof, possibly using their data, amid skepticism about GPT-6 Astra claims.

NYU mathematicians Tristan Buckmaster and Levent Alpöge published solutions to decades-old blowup problems for incompressible Euler, Boussinesq, and porous media equations on the same day OpenAI claimed its internal model solved the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem. OpenAI admitted its effort began September 1st after hearing a related rumor and said it cannot rule out that de-identified data from the researchers' use of its products, such as private Codex sessions, helped improve its models. The column questions OpenAI's transparency, noting the company had just released GPT-6 Astra with claims including that AGI has been achieved, following recent controversies over its agent hacking Hugging Face and a German wiki site.

Hacker News · security·Sep 9, 17:09 UTC · 7d agoAI industryHN 20↑ · 6 comments

Clay Mathematics Institute says the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem has "apparently been settled"

Clay Mathematics Institute says the Navier-Stokes Millennium Problem appears settled amid accusations OpenAI misused a mathematician's leaked drafts.

The Clay Mathematics Institute stated the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of seven problems worth $1 million each, has 'apparently been settled' and the solution is under review. A dispute has erupted around the work: mathematician Tristan Buckmaster accuses OpenAI of redirecting resources to the problem after rumors of his research leaked, using his drafts in training data, and excluding co-author Levent Alpöge, who works at Anthropic. CMI also noted new technologies' increasing ability to accelerate mathematical research.

The Decoder·Sep 14, 13:01 UTC · 3d agoAI industry1

Drama swirls around OpenAI’s legendary mathematical milestone

OpenAI claims an internal AI model solved the 90-year-old Navier-Stokes problem, sparking a priority dispute with mathematician Tristan Buckmaster.

OpenAI announced a solution to the Navier-Stokes problem, one of the $1 million Millennium Prize Problems, using an internal AI model it says outperforms the newly released GPT-6 Astra alongside 10,000 concurrent agents. NYU professor Tristan Buckmaster, who with Anthropic researcher Levent Alpöge published related findings a day earlier, questioned whether OpenAI accessed drafts from his Codex sessions. OpenAI says no specific user data was accessed, though it cannot rule out that de-identified usage data helped improve its models.

The Verge · AI·Sep 8, 20:53 UTC · 8d agoAI industry1

Caltech Mathathon – first hackathon ever devoted to research level mathematics

Caltech will host the first research-level mathematics hackathon on October 30, giving 100 teams frontier AI models to attack open conjectures.

The Caltech Mathathon runs October 30 to November 1, assembling about 100 teams that will receive frontier models and over $2 million in AI credits to work on open mathematical problems. Teams will defend their results before leading mathematicians, with prize rounds before and after community verification of the results. The announcement cites recent AI-driven math results, including the disproof of Erdos's 80-year-old planar unit-distance conjecture, the first explicit non-sofic group, and a claimed complex structure on the six-sphere (unverified).

Hacker News · security·Sep 7, 09:26 UTC · 10d agoAI industryHN 264↑ · 92 comments1

OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra decrypts a Nazi radio message in ten hours that went unsolved for 83 years

A Bloomberg developer used OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra to decrypt an 83-year-old Enigma-encrypted 1941 Wehrmacht radio message in about ten hours.

Carter Leffen, a product development coach at Bloomberg LP, used OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra 'Extra High' and multiple AI agents to decrypt an 82-character Enigma-encrypted 1941 radio message, tagged MVUEH, that had been unsolved for 83 years. The model spent roughly ten hours searching archives, building an Enigma simulator, writing cryptanalysis code, and testing competing keys; the breakthrough came from the town name 'Rosenow' appearing in a same-day decrypted message. The decrypted text contains operator typos supporting authenticity, and verification packages plus a 3D Enigma simulator are published, pending independent expert review.

The Decoder·09:45 UTC · 4h agoAI industry1· 1 read

AI labs have a data trust problem that their policies haven't solved

Nvidia, Palantir, and Booz Allen restrict Anthropic's Fable over data-retention distrust, exposing gaps in AI labs' customer data policies.

Nvidia limits Anthropic's Fable to non-sensitive work and runs its own Nemotron models for internal tasks, while Palantir blocks Fable deployment until Anthropic grants irrevocable zero-data-retention guarantees, and Booz Allen bans it for proprietary cybersecurity work. John Schulman and researcher Sarah Hooker explain that labs can still extract customer IP from metadata, user traces, and synthetic data even under zero data retention. The trust crisis crystallized around Tristan Buckmaster's accusation that OpenAI's Codex absorbed his Navier-Stokes drafts, though OpenAI later stated his prompts could not have influenced its model.

The Decoder·Sep 15, 17:52 UTC · 1d agoAI industry

Notes on gotchas while migrating 35kb preprompts from Opus to self-hosted Ollama

Opinion piece urges migrating 35KB preprompts from Anthropic/OpenAI to self-hosted Ollama, citing session privacy risks and safety filters blocking security research.

The author documents gotchas migrating 35KB preprompts from Claude Opus to self-hosted Ollama, motivated by fears that frontier providers train on user sessions, citing the OpenAI Navier-Stokes controversy. The piece argues inference providers cannot audit their own retention or training pipelines and that only self-hosted hardware offers verifiable privacy. It also criticizes frontier safety filters for refusing vulnerability research tasks and calls for models that support exploitability testing in CI/CD pipelines.

Hacker News · AI·Sep 14, 13:59 UTC · 2d agoAI industryHN 41↑ · 13 comments1

China's AI Strategy and its Security Implications

Schneier on Security·Jan 29, 02:55 UTC · Jan 29, 2025AI industry