Search: “logging”

4 stories in the last 24h

Searchkeyword smart Sortlatest hot importance relevance

DomainAll Cyber AIWindow24h 3d 7d 30d AllIn the wild Important only Show duplicates

CategoryAll Threat actor 13 Exploit / PoC 12 Vulnerability 9 AI safety & security 8 Data breach 6 Advisory 5 AI research 4 Malware 3 AI tools & infra 2 Phishing & fraud 2 Industry 2 Policy & legal 1 Ransomware 1

SeverityAll critical 11 high 24 medium 14 low 0 info 19

Exponential Hardness of Off-Policy Evaluation under History-Dependent Logging

Researchers prove off-policy evaluation under history-dependent logging requires exponentially many episodes, resolving a hardness question for model-based POMDP evaluation.

The paper constructs POMDPs with at most two latent states per stage, three actions, and a three-memory-state logger where evaluating a known deterministic target policy to accuracy 1/8 requires Θ((3/2)^H log(1/δ)) episodes for any horizon H≥3. Coverage and outcome-revealing conditions hold with constants independent of H, yet a reset erases the unknown transition that determines the target value. The authors characterize the resulting statistical experiment exactly, derive a matching optimal estimator, and validate predictions on a two-lane gridworld. This settles the history-dependent-logging, model-based case posed by Zhang and Jiang (arXiv:2503.01134).

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLSep 16, 17:56 UTC · 20h agoAI research

Playing log(N)-Questions over Wikipedia Abstracts: Communication Efficiency Between Paired Frontier Models

Six frontier models play a two-agent log(N)-Questions game; Claude Opus 5 lags with 28/68 wins while the top five are near-tied.

The study evaluates six frontier models on a two-agent game where a questioner must identify one of N Wikipedia lead paragraphs in exactly log2 N yes/no questions, run over 408 games at $363 total API cost. Claude Opus 5 wins 28 of 68 games versus 45-56 for GLM-5.3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.8 Flash, and Kimi K3. Pooled top-five win rates decline with set size (r=-0.973) and fit win = p^(log2 N) with per-round reliability p=0.928, and information per question correlates with win rate at r=+0.88.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLSep 16, 17:41 UTC · 21h agoAI research 20 sources

Nunchux AI Introduces VC-Attention: A Training-Free Low-Bit Attention Kernel That Speeds Up Video Diffusion Transformers

Nunchux AI introduces VC-Attention, a training-free low-bit attention kernel that speeds up video diffusion transformers up to 3.58x.

Nunchux AI unveiled VC-Attention, a training-free attention kernel for video Diffusion Transformers combining V-Smooth (k-means value-token grouping with block-mean residual quantization) and ExpCast-FP8 (single multiply-add softmax exponentiation). Benchmarks on Wan2.2-T2V-A14B, LongCat-Video, HunyuanVideo-1.5, and MiniMax-H3 show 1.59x attention speedup on B200 at 8-bit and 3.58x on RTX 5090 at 4-bit, with end-to-end gains up to 1.70x. It beats SageAttention2 by 2.3 dB PSNR on Wan2.2 at 8-bit and SageAttention3 by up to 3.6 dB at 4-bit. No public kernel release yet; a proprietary extension runs in Nunchux's stack.

MarkTechPost00:45 UTC · 14h agoAI research 2 sources1

Objective vs. Search: Decomposing What Makes a Good Tokeniser

New tokeniser study shows search procedure, not optimisation objective, drives bits-per-byte performance across model sizes, vocabulary sizes, and multilingual settings.

The paper disentangles BPE and UnigramLM along two axes: optimisation objective (compression vs log-likelihood) and search procedure (bottom-up merging vs top-down pruning). Two new algorithms, BottomUpLL and TopDownComp, complete the 2x2 design space, and trained language models are evaluated on bits-per-byte and BLiMP across model sizes, vocabulary sizes, and English-only vs multilingual domains. Bottom-up tokenisers consistently achieve lower bits-per-byte in most settings, while BLiMP shows no consistent relationship with design choice.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLSep 16, 17:59 UTC · 20h agoAI research