Search: “workers”

6 stories in the last 30d

Searchkeyword smart Sortlatest hot importance relevance

DomainAll Cyber AIWindow24h 3d 7d 30d AllIn the wild Important only Show duplicates

CategoryAll Threat actor 29 Malware 28 AI industry 20 AI safety & security 16 Phishing & fraud 12 Vulnerability 11 Industry 11 Policy & legal 11 Exploit / PoC 9 AI research 6 Research 5 AI tools & infra 4 Tools 4 AI policy 2

SeverityAll critical 3 high 50 medium 54 low 2 info 64

Guiding Worker Self-Selection in Crowdsourcing Contests: An LLM-Augmented Algorithmic Approach

Researchers introduce GRAF, a greedy framework for crowdsourcing contest self-selection, and LLMScore, an LLM-driven method that auto-designs its scoring algorithm.

The paper studies self-selection in Tullock contests (SSTC), where workers choose contests and then compete within them. GRAF is a greedy polynomial-time framework that orders workers by a score vector with zero worker regret and platform optimality guarantees in special cases. LLMScore is an LLM-driven evolutionary framework that produces human-readable, inspectable scoring code, jointly optimizing platform utility and worker satisfaction. Across 1,000 synthetic instances in four settings, GRAF with LLMScore achieves high-quality, often near-optimal outcomes with low worker regret, transferring from small training instances to larger, structurally different settings.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLSep 7, 16:51 UTC · 9d agoAI research1

Agora: Git as Shared Memory for Collective AutoResearch

Agora records multi-agent research as an append-only Git DAG; 13 LLM workers ran nearly 12 days on a weight-transfer problem.

Agora stores every result, hypothesis, and verification as an immutable commit in a Git-stored DAG, with a derived index exposing the frontier and verification status of claims. In a nearly 12-day run, 13 language-model workers with no assigned tasks or central planner published 1,703 contributions on initializing a frozen 119.6M-parameter attention-SSM hybrid from 141 donor models. They improved the evaluator from 3.39 to 1.899 bits per byte, closing 62% of the gap to a trained GPT-2 124M, with 165 independent reproductions posted and none failing.

Hugging Face daily papersSep 15, 20:00 UTC · 1d agoAI research

Bridging the Gap Between Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Asynchronous Optimization Is Surprisingly Difficult

Lower bounds show heterogeneous asynchronous optimization cannot match homogeneous rates under standard similarity assumptions; strong interpolation plus local PL condition closes the gap.

The paper examines whether pessimistic optimal time complexities for asynchronous distributed optimization with heterogeneous workers (different data distributions) can be overcome. It proves improvement is provably impossible under widely used first- and second-order similarity assumptions for any randomized algorithm, and that the weak interpolation assumption alone is also insufficient. Combining strong interpolation with the local Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition yields a new time complexity bound matching the best-known homogeneous dependence on worker computation times without requiring identical data distributions.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLSep 15, 17:24 UTC · 1d agoAI research

Bilevel Coordinated Reflection: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Paper models multi-agent LLM orchestration as a bilevel game, proving transcript-only gating limits and introducing grounded-memory SRMA.

A new paper frames orchestrator-worker coordination in multi-agent LLM systems as a bilevel coordination game and analyzes free-form reflection as stochastic movement over semantic memory states, deriving finite-time bounds and an information-theoretic impossibility result: no gate observing only the generated transcript can uniformly improve over text-indistinguishable environments, while an environment-grounded gate can. The authors propose Stochastic Reflective Memory Ascent (SRMA), which accepts candidate memory only when grounded evaluation risk strictly decreases, with geometric or polynomial convergence guarantees. On 500 SWE-bench instances, a Kimi-based instantiation of the full system resolves 72.2% versus a 70.8% public mini-SWE-agent reference.

Hugging Face daily papersSep 1, 20:00 UTC · 15d agoAI research1

GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GPT-6 Astra: Is a $1.20 Model Good Enough for Code Review?

Entelligence benchmarks GPT-5.6 Luna ($1.20/M output) against GPT-6 Astra for code review: Luna found 69 verified bugs at 3.6% of Astra's cost.

Entelligence compared GPT-5.6 Luna ($0.20/$1.20 per million tokens) against GPT-6 Astra ($10/$50) on 50 benchmark pull requests from Cal.com, Sentry, Discourse, Keycloak, and Grafana. Astra verified 92 bugs versus Luna's 69, with precision of 96% versus 74%, and Astra caught 19 of 24 security bugs while Luna found only 9. Luna cost $0.20 total versus Astra's $5.66 and reviewed faster at 23 seconds versus 36, with the widest quality gap on Keycloak authentication and permission logic (6 vs 14 verified bugs). Running both models would find 82% of the 143 verified bugs for $5.86 total.

Hacker News · AISep 14, 19:56 UTC · 2d agoAI research HN 44↑ · 45 comments

Unsolved Problem by Fields Medalist Breached by Two High School Students

Two high school students used Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol to help solve an open Lorentzian polynomials problem, posting a 75-page arXiv proof.

Aayush Bathija and Prince Rohatgi of Oak Park High School, mentored by UCLA postdoc Daniel Soskin, published the 75-page paper 'Bounded Ratios for Lorentzian Polynomials' (arXiv 2609.05341), solving an open problem in Fields Medalist June Huh's Lorentzian polynomial theory. The main structural theorem extends bounded coefficient-ratio characterization from quadratic to arbitrary-degree polynomials via discrete convexity conditions. The students used Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol for exploration and proof ideas but independently verified all arguments; the result follows an open letter from 25 Fields Medalists voicing concerns about AI's impact on mathematical rigor.

Hacker News · securitySep 14, 12:23 UTC · 3d agoAI research HN 22↑ · 19 comments