Search: “Coder”

5 stories

Searchkeyword smart Sortlatest hot importance relevance

DomainAll Cyber AIWindow24h 3d 7d 30d AllIn the wild Important only Show duplicates

CategoryAll Malware 72 Vulnerability 49 Ransomware 41 Industry 23 Policy & legal 22 Exploit / PoC 17 Phishing & fraud 13 Data breach 12 AI safety & security 9 Threat actor 9 Research 7 Model release 6 AI research 5 Advisory 2

SeverityAll critical 74 high 93 medium 65 low 40 info 20

Retrofitting Code Using LLMs to Support Exceptional Behavior

EXCODER combines static/dynamic analysis with LLMs to retrofit exception-handling code, achieving 85.92% pass@1 with Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B on Java benchmarks.

The paper introduces the task of retrofitting existing code with Exception Related Code (throw statements, guarding conditions, try/catch blocks) so that given Exceptional Behavior Tests pass. EXCODER performs context engineering by integrating static and dynamic program analysis output with LLMs; it was evaluated on a benchmark built from 304 methods across 75 GitHub Java projects. Combined with Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B, EXCODER achieves pass@1, 5, and 10 rates of 85.92%, 86.18%, and 86.51%, roughly 13 percentage points over baseline, and manual inspection reveals remaining limitations.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLSep 9, 16:18 UTC · 6d agoAI research1

Cadence: Error-Bounded Lossy Compression of Demand Time Series with a Time-Series Foundation Model

Cadence pairs Google's 330M-parameter TimesFM-3 foundation model with adaptive arithmetic coding, gaining 13-28% on 2026 demand series over classical predictors.

Cadence is an error-bounded lossy compressor for numeric time series combining the 330M-parameter Google TimesFM-3 foundation model with an adaptive arithmetic coder, guaranteeing a per-sample error bound. On 49 EIA-930 balancing-authority demand series from 2026 it gains 13.3% over the best of six classical predictors and 28.3% on 50 MTA ridership series, winning all 297 series-tolerance pairs with a 21.4% median gain. The paper also reports negative results, including that foundation models add negligible value for lossless coding and that PyTorch predictions are not bit-identical across batch sizes.

Hugging Face daily papersSep 4, 20:00 UTC · 11d agoAI research1

How much of F-Droid is LLM generated?

A FOSS maintainer manually graded 102 F-Droid apps from the September 12, 2026 update batch, finding many show signs of LLM-generated code.

A student and FOSS app maintainer reviewed 102 apps pushed to F-Droid on September 12, 2026, assigning each a three-tier rating for likelihood of LLM-authored code (mostly AI >50%, hard to say/mostly human, no signs of AI). The heuristic relies on commit aesthetics, README and branding style, and the presence of agentic infrastructure like Claude Code or Codex, which automatically places an app in the 'mostly AI' tier. Example ratings include Amber (Nostr event signer) as mostly AI, and Aria for Misskey as showing no AI signs. The author stresses reliable detection of LLM-generated code from text alone is impossible, so ratings are approximate.

Hacker News · AISep 15, 09:47 UTC · 23h agoAI research HN 46↑ · 23 comments

Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails

Research shows on-policy expert correction, not imitation fine-tuning, lets weaker agent models catch up under evolved harnesses.

Researchers study how to combine automated agent-harness evolution with lightweight fine-tuning across seven enterprise agent tasks. Naively training weaker models (Qwen3-Coder, Gemma 4) on expert trajectories under an evolved harness regressed performance by 4 to 30 points on all tasks. They propose an on-policy correction pipeline, automated by a meta-level MLE agent, where an expert rewrites only the failing turn of the weaker model's rollout, preserving model-harness fit.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLSep 8, 17:53 UTC · 7d agoAI research

Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails

Research shows imitation of expert trajectories breaks weaker models' harness fit, while on-policy expert correction preserves gains across seven enterprise agent tasks.

The paper studies combining automated agent-harness evolution with lightweight fine-tuning across seven enterprise agent tasks using Qwen3-Coder and Gemma 4. Training weaker models on complete expert trajectories under an evolved harness regressed performance by 4-30 points on all tasks, disrupting model-harness fit. The authors propose an on-policy expert-correction pipeline, automated by a meta-level MLE agent, that rewrites only failing turns and preserves the model's planning style.

Hugging Face daily papersSep 7, 20:00 UTC · 8d agoAI research