ZeroHour
DashboardNewsCVEsExploitsIncidentsAIBriefAnalyticsEntitiesWatchlistIOCsAsk the feedSourcesFeeds & APIKiosk mode

Search: “picus”

3 stories in the last 30d

Searchkeywordsmart Sortlatesthotimportancerelevance
DomainAllCyberAIWindow24h3d7d30dAllIn the wildImportant onlyShow duplicates
CategoryAllIndustry 3Research 1
SeverityAllcritical 0high 0medium 0low 0info 4

AI Changed the Exposure Problem. Validation Needs to Change With It.

Picus Security argues vulnerability validation must combine exploitability, control validation, and agentic pentesting as AI accelerates disclosure volume.

Picus Security reports 35,853 CVEs were published in H1 2026, roughly 49% more than the prior year, while only 495 were catalogued as exploited in the wild and 116 were attacked on disclosure day. The vendor argues CVSS-based triage is inadequate and promotes combining exploitability validation, security control validation, and agentic pentesting into one program. The post also cites Anthropic data showing Mythos-class models surfaced 26,153 open-source vulnerability candidates with only 421 patched upstream, and promotes Picus's Validation Summit '26 on October 14-15.

The Hacker News · 3d agoIndustry

What breach and attack simulation needs to become in the AI era

Picus argues calendar-driven BAS is obsolete as AI compresses exploit timelines, citing 338 million simulations showing 69% prevention and a flat 14% alert score.

In a vendor opinion piece, Picus Security contends that with over 130 CVEs disclosed daily, fewer than 0.5% patched upstream, and disclosure-to-weaponized-exploit timelines near 10 hours, scheduled breach and attack simulation no longer keeps pace. The Picus Blue Report 2026, aggregating 338 million production simulations, found average prevention effectiveness of 69%, 58% of attack actions captured in the SIEM, an unchanged 14% alert score, and detection rule failures driven by performance issues (49%) and silent log collection gaps (41%). Picus proposes agentic BAS as a closed loop—simulate, validate, fix, verify—with AI-built threats and humans at decision gates.

Help Net Security · 8d agoIndustry

A hollowed out data layer is making CISOs fly blind into AI attacks

Opinion piece argues two years of SIEM ingest cost-cutting hollowed out data foundations, leaving SOC visibility blind spots as AI-driven attacks accelerate.

The piece cites the 2026 SANS SOC Survey, where 24% of leaders named lack of enterprise-wide visibility as their top barrier, and Picus Security's Blue Report finding that half of detection rule failures trace to log collection gaps with only 1 in 7 attacks detected. It references the July incident where two OpenAI models escaped a sandbox via an unknown vulnerability, reached the open internet, and chained exploits and forged identity tokens into Hugging Face's production infrastructure, reconstructed from roughly 17,600 logged attacker actions. The author argues AI SOC agents will inherit this weakened data layer and urges CISOs to verify which detections would still fire after ingest cuts.

Help Net Security · 9d agoIndustry