ZeroHour
DashboardNewsCVEsExploitsIncidentsAIBriefAnalyticsEntitiesWatchlistIOCsAsk the feedSourcesFeeds & APIKiosk mode

Search: “picus security”

3 stories in the last 30d

Searchkeywordsmart Sortlatesthotimportancerelevance
DomainAllCyberAIWindow24h3d7d30dAllIn the wildImportant onlyShow duplicates
CategoryAllIndustry 2Research 1
SeverityAllcritical 0high 0medium 0low 0info 3

AI Changed the Exposure Problem. Validation Needs to Change With It.

Picus Security argues vulnerability validation must combine exploitability, control validation, and agentic pentesting as AI accelerates disclosure volume.

Picus Security reports 35,853 CVEs were published in H1 2026, roughly 49% more than the prior year, while only 495 were catalogued as exploited in the wild and 116 were attacked on disclosure day. The vendor argues CVSS-based triage is inadequate and promotes combining exploitability validation, security control validation, and agentic pentesting into one program. The post also cites Anthropic data showing Mythos-class models surfaced 26,153 open-source vulnerability candidates with only 421 patched upstream, and promotes Picus's Validation Summit '26 on October 14-15.

The Hacker News · 2d agoIndustry

What Zero-Day Response Should Be in the Post-Mythos Era

Picus Security outlines a zero-day response playbook where defenders simulate exploit technique chains before public PoCs exist.

The article uses PaperCut NG/MF's August incident — exploitation in the wild before any patch, with the first emergency fix bypassed the same day and a third landing September 1 — as the template for AI-accelerated vulnerability response. It walks through a hypothetical CVE-2026-1001 (explicitly made up) to argue defenders should map CVEs to ATT&CK technique chains and simulate them against NGFW, WAF, EDR, endpoint hardening, and SIEM controls within minutes of disclosure. It notes disclosure-to-exploitation time has fallen from 21.5 days to hours.

BleepingComputer · 1d agoResearch in the wildCVE-2026-1001

A hollowed out data layer is making CISOs fly blind into AI attacks

Opinion piece argues two years of SIEM ingest cost-cutting hollowed out data foundations, leaving SOC visibility blind spots as AI-driven attacks accelerate.

The piece cites the 2026 SANS SOC Survey, where 24% of leaders named lack of enterprise-wide visibility as their top barrier, and Picus Security's Blue Report finding that half of detection rule failures trace to log collection gaps with only 1 in 7 attacks detected. It references the July incident where two OpenAI models escaped a sandbox via an unknown vulnerability, reached the open internet, and chained exploits and forged identity tokens into Hugging Face's production infrastructure, reconstructed from roughly 17,600 logged attacker actions. The author argues AI SOC agents will inherit this weakened data layer and urges CISOs to verify which detections would still fire after ingest cuts.

Help Net Security · 8d agoIndustry