ZeroHour
DashboardNewsCVEsExploitsIncidentsAIBriefAnalyticsEntitiesWatchlistIOCsAsk the feedSourcesFeeds & APIKiosk mode

Search: “FCC”

54 stories

Searchkeywordsmart Sortlatesthotimportancerelevance
DomainAllCyberAIWindow24h3d7d30dAllIn the wildImportant onlyShow duplicates
CategoryAllExploit / PoC 3220Ransomware 1190Policy & legal 953Data breach 680Malware 480Vulnerability 441Threat actor 422Phishing & fraud 271AI safety & security 23Advisory 21Industry 7AI policy 4Model release 4Research 3
SeverityAllcritical 7072high 218medium 174low 207info 54

A bold new strategy or a dangerous precedent? Experts are divided on Trump's memo.

Trump presidential memorandum authorizes private-sector companies to conduct federally supervised hacking operations against transnational criminal organizations.

A newly signed presidential memorandum enlists private companies in federal law enforcement hacking operations aimed at transnational criminal organizations, with a 60-day window to establish the program. Experts told CyberScoop the shift raises attribution, targeting and constitutional questions, including risks of private firms accidentally attacking foreign governments and procedures for prior approval before targeting US persons. Critics likened the approach to historical letters of marque, while supporters including NSC cyber policy director Amanda Naylor framed it as bringing private-sector speed to the fight against cybercrime and fraud.

CyberScoop · Aug 13, 2026Policy & legal

AI’s ‘middle class’ has gotten dramatically better at hacking

XBOW research shows mid-tier AI models now match frontier hacking capability at lower cost, raising concerns about widespread malicious offensive AI use.

XBOW benchmarks show mid-tier models such as Z.ai's GLM-5.2, xAI's Grok 4.5 and OpenAI's GPT-5.5 now complete moderately complex agentic exploitation tasks that they failed at six months ago. GPT-5.5 cut the vulnerability miss rate to 10% versus GPT-5's 40% and exploited targets without source code access, working only against the running system. Anthropic testing found a coordinating multi-agent swarm found 266 vulnerabilities across 15 open-source projects but consumed 27 million tokens, versus 21 bugs for 6.5 million tokens with non-coordinating agents. Researchers warn cheap, capable models lower the cost barrier for malicious actors to run offensive AI at scale, alongside recent sandbox-escape incidents at major labs.

CyberScoop · Aug 13, 2026AI safety & security

Trump turns to private sector in offensive hacking operations memo

Trump signed a national security memorandum authorizing vetted private companies to conduct offensive cyber operations against transnational criminal organizations under federal oversight.

The memorandum creates a federal coordination center program authorizing 'Participating Companies' to conduct Cyber Surveillance Operations and Cyber Effects Operations against foreign cyber-enabled transnational criminal organizations. Participating firms must contract with the Justice Department or Department of Homeland Security, undergo vetting, and comply with existing laws including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The White House cited sustained fraud and cyber-enabled campaigns from TCOs as justification, building on a March fraud-focused executive order. Experts including Veracode co-founder Chris Wysopal called it a major shift in U.S. cyber policy, though it stops short of broader 'hack back' proposals.

CyberScoop · Aug 13, 2026Policy & legal1

The FTC wants to regulate AI for ideological bias

FTC proposes classifying ideological bias in AI systems as an unfair or deceptive practice, drawing criticism over legal authority and censorship risks.

FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson's proposed policy statement would treat ideological bias in AI systems as an unfair or deceptive practice under Section 5 of the FTC Act, potentially allowing regulation of the training and inputs powering AI algorithms. The statement also asserts that federal authority supersedes state AI laws such as the Colorado AI Act, which requires bias audits before release in 2027. More than 300 public comments criticized the proposal as ill-defined and vulnerable to politically motivated censorship, with First Amendment concerns raised across the political spectrum. Critics noted the document repeatedly cites Anthropic as an example of ideological bias while barely mentioning xAI's Grok despite Elon Musk's admitted interventions in model outputs.

CyberScoop · Aug 11, 2026AI policy

NIST wants to overhaul its vulnerability database for the AI age

NIST issued a Federal Register RFI seeking public input on overhauling the National Vulnerability Database for AI-scale, machine-consumable security data.

NIST published a request for information arguing the National Vulnerability Database must adapt as LLMs increasingly find and exploit vulnerabilities at machine scale. The RFI seeks input on integrating automation into vulnerability reporting, faster dissemination to defenders, and transparency and auditability in AI-driven decisions. It follows the White House-backed Gold Eagle clearinghouse at Treasury and the VINCE program with Carnegie Mellon's Software Engineering Institute for AI-discovered vulnerability reports.

CyberScoop · Aug 11, 2026Policy & legal