ZeroHour
DashboardNewsCVEsExploitsIncidentsAIBriefAnalyticsEntitiesWatchlistIOCsAsk the feedSourcesFeeds & APIKiosk mode

Search: “intrusion response”

2,984 stories

Searchkeywordsmart Sortlatesthotimportancerelevance
DomainAllCyberAIWindow24h3d7d30dAllIn the wildImportant onlyShow duplicates
CategoryAllRansomware 721Malware 471Data breach 410Vulnerability 395Threat actor 327Exploit / PoC 279Policy & legal 170Industry 75Phishing & fraud 53Advisory 29AI safety & security 25Research 13Tools 8AI tools & infra 6
SeverityAllcritical 1424high 975medium 347low 187info 59

Learning Intrusion Response Strategies for OT Systems

Researchers model OT intrusion response as a POMDP and train PPO-based automated response strategies effective against MITRE attacks in an emulated OT system.

The paper formalizes automated intrusion response for OT systems as a partially observable Markov decision process, with partial observability modeled from traffic measurements. Learning-based solution methods built on PPO are developed and evaluated on an emulated OT system. The resulting response strategies proved effective against several types of MITRE attacks for the studied use case.

arXiv cs.CR · 6d agoResearch2

Turn it off and on again, but for critical infrastructure

KTH researchers trained a reinforcement-learning intrusion response agent on an emulated segmented OT network that autonomously resets hosts and processes to disrupt intruders.

Researchers at KTH Royal Institute of Technology built a containerized replica of a segmented industrial network, attacked it across 14 days, and captured 40,000 30-second traffic intervals to train a defense agent under partial observability. The agent observes six packet-count numbers per interval, maintains 500 running state hypotheses, and can reset supervisory hosts, water tank processes, or entire subnets, with resets rebooting the target, renewing credentials, and changing its IP. The best agent approached a full-visibility baseline but depends on an assumed attacker behavior model; the testbed comprised three supervisory hosts, two PLCs, two tanks, weak credentials, and CVE-2017-7494 exposure. The team released its implementation and plans validation on a real industrial testbed with a partner.

Help Net Security · 1d agoResearchCVE-2017-74942· 1 read