UNC5820 used Fortinet zero-days to plant PeerStitch at a telecom
CISA added CVE-2025-61624 to KEV; the memory-only implant rides legitimate FortiGate process traffic.
Unauthenticated RCE in Fortinet FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud
CISA: Fortinet FortiManager Missing Authentication Vulnerability
CVE-2024-47575 is a missing-authentication flaw (CWE-306) in Fortinet FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud, rated critical at CVSS 9.8. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted requests to the affected management interface and execute arbitrary code or commands, with no credentials, privileges, or user interaction required. Every supported FortiManager branch from 6.2 through 7.6 and four FortiManager Cloud branches are affected, meaning any organization using these products as the central management plane for FortiGate firewalls is exposed, and compromise of the appliance can provide a foothold across the entire managed firewall estate. The flaw was exploited as a zero-day in an active campaign before patches were available, was added to CISA KEV on 2024-10-23 (ransomware use not yet confirmed), and carries a 95.1% EPSS probability of exploitation within 30 days.
What to do: Upgrade FortiManager and FortiManager Cloud to the fixed releases listed in Fortinet advisory FG-IR-24-423 (FortiManager 7.6.1+, 7.4.5+, 7.2.8+, 7.0.13+, 6.4.15+, or 6.2.13+; Cloud 7.4.5+, 7.2.8+, 7.0.13+, or 6.4.8+), or apply the interim mitigations of restricting which IP addresses may connect to the fgfm service, disabling fgfm where it is not required, and applying the vendor's IPS signature. Hunt logs for signs of exploitation, such as unexpected fgfm requests, unknown IPs, or unexplained device registrations on the FortiManager. As a CISA KEV entry, federal agencies and other CISA-directed organizations must apply the mitigations or discontinue use of the product by the required deadline.
| Product | Affected |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiManager | 7.6.0 |
| Fortinet FortiManager | 7.4.0 through 7.4.4 |
| Fortinet FortiManager | 7.2.0 through 7.2.7 |
| Fortinet FortiManager | 7.0.0 through 7.0.12 |
| Fortinet FortiManager | 6.4.0 through 6.4.14 |
| Fortinet FortiManager | 6.2.0 through 6.2.12 |
| Fortinet FortiManager Cloud | 7.4.1 through 7.4.4 |
| Fortinet FortiManager Cloud | 7.2.1 through 7.2.7 |
| Fortinet FortiManager Cloud | 7.0.1 through 7.0.12 |
| Fortinet FortiManager Cloud | 6.4.1 through 6.4.7 |
Order-of-magnitude estimate by the model from install counts, market share and public scan data it knows; verify before quoting.
A missing authentication for critical function in FortiManager 7.6.0, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, FortiManager 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, FortiManager 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.0.1 through 7.0.12, FortiManager Cloud 6.4.1 through 6.4.7 allows attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
CISA added CVE-2025-61624 to KEV; the memory-only implant rides legitimate FortiGate process traffic.
Unit 42 says CL-STA-0954 used Fortinet flaws to deploy memory-resident PEERSTITCH against a telecom provider.
Unit 42 says UNC5820 stole data on 500-plus FortiGates and deployed memory-resident PEERSTITCH malware.
Unit 42 says PEERSTITCH, planted through FortiManager flaws, exposed material for more than 500 firewalls.
Attackers exploited Fortinet flaws at a telecom MSP and deployed the stealthy PEERSTITCH implant on FortiGate firewalls.
Unit 42 details PEERSTITCH, a memory-resident implant used against FortiGate firewalls at a telecom MSP.
Today 369 readers · 400 views · 302 reads · all time 158K views