Operational Roles of QRNG-Derived Quantum Entropy in Bitcoin Proof-of-Work Architectures
arXiv study finds quantum-random entropy adds no Bitcoin PoW success advantage but helps assurance in fault and provenance scenarios.
The paper shows replacing classical entropy with QRNG output does not change honest Bitcoin proof-of-work success probability when candidate headers remain distinct. It introduces a reproducible benchmark measuring an entropy-efficiency factor and a reboot-diversity index, finding QRNG value only in assurance-oriented scenarios involving correlated restart faults, namespace reuse, and entropy provenance. Validation is simulation-based, with hardware-in-the-loop testing identified as future work.
- QRNG entropy does not improve honest Bitcoin PoW success probability
- Benchmark measures entropy-efficiency and reboot-diversity via Monte Carlo simulation
- Value appears only in correlated-fault and entropy-provenance assurance scenarios
Full article121 words · extracted from arxiv.org · click to collapse
Replacing classical entropy with QRNG output does not change honest Bitcoin PoW success probability when candidate headers remain distinct. The original contribution of this paper is a reproducible benchmark that locates and measures the operational value of quantum entropy in hybrid quantum-classical mining infrastructure through two scheduler-level observables, the entropy-efficiency factor $η$ and the reboot-diversity index $ρ$. Monte Carlo and scheduler simulations with confidence intervals show parity for competent deterministic and strong-classical baselines, while QRNG value emerges in assurance-oriented scenarios involving correlated restart faults, namespace reuse, and entropy provenance. The study is therefore positioned as a simulation-based validation framework rather than as a device-level QRNG demonstration; hardware-in-the-loop validation with recorded or live QRNG streams is identified as the next experimental step.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05092