Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

RAG-PIBench: A Leakage-Aware Benchmark for Prompt-Injection Detection in Trustworthy RAG Systems

arXiv cs.CRby Niveen O. Jaffal ()1 min read3
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

RAG-PIBench offers 4,876 leakage-aware examples for detecting prompt injection in RAG systems.

The paper introduces RAG-PIBench, a leakage-aware benchmark for detecting prompt injection embedded in retrieved content for RAG systems. It contains 4,876 contextual examples split into frozen train, validation, and protected-test sets. DistilBERT records the best protected-test scores, with F1 0.896 and PR-AUC 0.968, while TF-IDF SVM and logistic regression stay competitive. The authors argue that leakage-aware design and strong sparse baselines improve reliable detection.

Key facts
  • Benchmark contains 4,876 examples with frozen train, validation, and protected-test splits.
  • DistilBERT leads the protected test with F1 0.896 and PR-AUC 0.968.
  • TF-IDF SVM and logistic regression remain competitive sparse baselines.
  • A leakage-aware pipeline is used to limit train-test contamination.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are vulnerable to prompt-injection attacks embedded in retrieved content. We introduce RAG-PIBench, a benchmark for RAG-style prompt-injection detection containing 4,876 contextual examples across frozen train, validation, and protected-test splits.

arXiv cs.CR

By Niveen O. Jaffal · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.