ZeroHour
oss-securitypublished ()ingested
Part of a story covered by 12 sources: “AI slops from Eve: oss-security debate over LLM-generated advisories ends with moderator finding no common source” — merged summary and timeline →

AI slops from Eve

infoIndustryimportance 18
AI summary · glm-5.3-flash

oss-security moderator Solar Designer approved three AI-generated vulnerability reports from automated security researcher Eve, sparking debate over AI slop on the list.

oss-security moderator Solar Designer approved three posts submitted by Eve, described as an 'automated security researcher', noting they lacked Date headers and arrived on the list server on September 9. He expressed uncertainty about their value but suggested they may have historical significance as early examples of AI-generated security reports at the dawn of AI security research. The post is meta-commentary on AI-generated content reaching a vulnerability disclosure mailing list rather than a specific vulnerability disclosure itself.

  • Solar Designer approved three posts from 'Eve', an automated security researcher
  • Posts lacked Date headers but arrived September 9
  • Moderator sees possible historical value in early AI-written reports
Full article

Posted by Solar Designer on Sep 09 Hi, I've just reluctantly approved 3 AI slop postings by Eve , who is an "automated security researcher". I don't know if there's any value in those, but I cannot rule that out. The value could end up historical preservation of what these reports looked like at the dawn of AI security research. These messages lack a Date header, but they arrived to the list server on September 9 starting...

This source does not provide full text. Read it at seclists.org.