When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn?

A fundamental question in physics is: When does classical behavior emerge from quantum systems? Bosonic Gaussian states provide a natural setting to explore this quantum-classical boundary, as they capture both the classical field behavior and the intrinsic quantum nature of light. Here, we address this problem from a learning-theoretic perspective by asking: When are bosonic Gaussian states classical to learn? That is, under what conditions (if any) can an n-mode bosonic Gaussian state be learned with as few samples, and with operations as simple, as are needed to learn a classical 2n-variate Gaussian distribution? We establish a smooth crossover in learnability governed by the state's thermal fluctuations: - Cold Gaussian states are non-classical to learn: When the covariance matrix satisfies $Σ\le(\frac12+O(\frac1n))I$, i.e. close to the vacuum covariance, tomography under single-copy (i.e., non-entangled) measurements fundamentally requires $Ω(n^3)$ copies, strictly exceeding the sample complexity $Θ(n^2)$ of learning classical Gaussian distributions. We show that this hardness persists even when few-copy entangled measurements are allowed. - Warm Gaussian states are classical to learn: When thermal fluctuations exceed the vacuum noise, parameterized by $Σ\ge(\frac12+ν)I$ for any parameter $ν>0$, we prove that single-copy tomography requires $N=Θ\left(n^2\min(n,1+ν^{-1})\right)$ copies. This bound is tight and is achieved by simple, non-adaptive, unentangled heterodyne measurements. Crucially, for $ν=Ω(1)$, the sample complexity drops to $Θ(n^2)$, matching the classical case. Our results tightly characterize a quantum-to-classical crossover in the learnability of bosonic Gaussian states, reveal a novel connection between fundamental physics and statistical learning theory, and have implications for real-world sensing experiments.

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26705