Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Wiretapping change sparks big privacy fight in the Golden State

CyberScoopby djohnson ()5 min read3
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

California's SB 690 ends private lawsuits over website tracking under the state's wiretap law.

Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 690, narrowing California's Invasion of Privacy Act so people can no longer sue over pen-register and trap-and-trace claims tied to cookies, analytics, and pixels. A 2015 provision had allowed private suits with penalties up to $5,000 per violation, and business groups said it produced thousands of demand letters. Privacy organizations including the EFF, ACLU, and EPIC opposed the change, arguing it weakens recourse against metadata surveillance and data sharing.

Key facts
  • Newsom signed SB 690, limiting CIPA private lawsuits.
  • Exemption covers pen-register and trap-and-trace tracking claims.
  • Business groups cited thousands of settlement demand letters.
  • EFF, ACLU, and EPIC opposed the bill.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

5 min read at cyberscoop.com

An update to a state wiretapping law will end private lawsuits over some internet tracking and surveillance, pitting businesses against privacy groups and unions.’ The post Wiretapping change sparks big privacy fight in the Golden State appeared first on CyberScoop.

CyberScoop

By djohnson · cyberscoop.com

Read the full article at CyberScoop

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.