Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

RefCon: Iterative Refinement and Contrastive Memory Extraction for Context-Evolving Agent

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Ubaidillah Ariq Prathama ()1 min read4 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

RefCon extracts agent memories via self-refinement and contrast, beating unlabeled baselines on AppWorld and BFCL-V3.

RefCon combines sequential self-refinement with parallel self-contrast so context-evolving agents can extract higher-quality memories without gold labels or retraining. Evaluated on AppWorld and BFCL-V3, it reports relative improvements of 21.6% on ACE and 16.6% on ReMe over no-scaling baselines, while diversity-focused DivCon gains 35.5% on ReasoningBank. It outperforms existing label-free baselines, generalizes across model scales, and surpasses ground-truth memory baselines on software-engineering tasks. Performance keeps improving as more trajectories are used, unlike diversity-only scaling, which saturates earlier.

Key facts
  • RefCon extracts memories without gold labels or retraining.
  • Relative gains are 21.6% on ACE and 16.6% on ReMe.
  • Diversity variant DivCon gains 35.5% on ReasoningBank.
  • It beats ground-truth baselines on software engineering tasks.
  • Gains continue as more trajectories are added.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Long-horizon agent interactions generate useful but noisy experience, and retraining models to absorb it is expensive. Context-evolving agents therefore need memory extraction methods that improve with more test-time compute without relying on gold labels. We propose RefCon, which combines sequential self-refinement with parallel self-contrast to extract higher-quality memories without gold labels.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Ubaidillah Ariq Prathama · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.