Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Osavul Lands $10 Million to Spot Hostile Intent Across Cyber, Physical Domains

SecurityWeekby SecurityWeek News ()1 min read1
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Osavul raised a $10 million Series A to scale AI that detects hostile intent across cyber, physical, and information domains.

Luxembourg-based Osavul raised $10 million (€8.5 million) in a Series A led by 33N Ventures, with Balnord, G+D Ventures, and 42CAP also participating, bringing total funding to about €12 million. Its AI platform analyzes open and privileged data to identify who is targeting a customer and map that intent to people, facilities, and supply chains, with analyst-reviewed assessments that can run on-premises. Developed during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, it serves government, defense, and security customers in more than 10 countries and helps deliver a NATO information-environment capability. The company will use the round to improve its AI and expand to enterprises and critical infrastructure.

Key facts
  • Series A of $10 million led by 33N Ventures; total funding about €12 million.
  • AI platform maps hostile intent against people, facilities, and supply chains, and can run on-premises.
  • Serves government and defense users in over 10 countries and supports a NATO assessment capability.
  • New capital will grow AI features and expand to enterprises and critical infrastructure.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at securityweek.com

Hybrid risk intelligence company Osavul has raised $10 million in a Series A funding round led by 33N Ventures. The post Osavul Lands $10 Million to Spot Hostile Intent Across Cyber, Physical Domains appeared first on SecurityWeek.

SecurityWeek

By SecurityWeek News · securityweek.com

Read the full article at SecurityWeek

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.