Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

I Am No One: Style-Aware Paraphrasing for Text Anonymization

arXiv cs.CRby Ahmed Sohair Khan ()1 min read2 · 2 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

Prompt-driven style-aware paraphrasing with LLMs cuts authorship attribution F1 by 60-70% while preserving content quality.

The paper proposes a style-aware, prompt-driven anonymization approach using pretrained LLMs to build compact stylistic profiles from minimal samples and rewrite text to suppress identifiable style markers while preserving meaning. It addresses stylometric re-identification risks in anonymized text, including ASR transcripts of meetings and call-center calls where leakage persists after acoustic anonymization. Across blog and review datasets, the approach reduces authorship attribution F1 by 60-70%, substantially outperforming both DP-based and non-DP baselines while maintaining readability.

Key facts
  • LLM-built stylistic profiles guide paraphrasing that suppresses identifiable style markers
  • Reduces authorship attribution F1 by 60-70% on blog and review datasets
  • Outperforms differential-privacy and non-DP anonymization baselines on quality and readability
  • Applies to speech-derived text such as ASR transcripts of meetings and call-center audio
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Authorship attribution models can re-identify users from seemingly anonymized text by exploiting stable stylistic fingerprints, even after explicit identifiers are removed, posing a growing privacy risk for text publishing and analytics. This risk extends to speech-derived text such as ASR transcripts of meetings and call-center conversations, where stylometric leakage can persist even after acoustic anonymization.

arXiv cs.CR

By Ahmed Sohair Khan · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.