Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Test-Time Agent Evolution for Long-Horizon Legal Reasoning

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Haotian Chen ()1 min read3
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A training-free legal agent adapts at test time using memory evolution and rubric-aligned collaboration.

The paper studies training-free test-time adaptation for long-horizon legal reasoning, where case facts, evidence, and procedures vary and decisions span multiple roles. Test-Time Memory Evolution retrieves experience from earlier cases, adapts it to the current context, and consolidates it for later decisions. Rubric-Aligned Collaboration verifies and revises role-specific actions against behavioral and procedural requirements. Experiments on J1-EVAL and LegalWorld across five backbone models show consistent gains over reasoning and agent baselines at moderate interaction and compute cost.

Key facts
  • Training-free agents adapt from prior cases without parameter updates.
  • Test-Time Memory Evolution retrieves, adapts, and consolidates experience.
  • Rubric-Aligned Collaboration checks actions against procedural requirements.
  • Gains reported on J1-EVAL and LegalWorld across five backbone models.
  • Ablations show complementary benefits for adaptation and cross-role coordination.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Legal intelligence aims to support reliable decision-making across long-horizon legal processes involving evolving case states and multiple roles. However, real-world legal deployment exhibits substantial case heterogeneity in facts, evidence, and procedural contexts, exposing the limitations of static agent strategies.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Haotian Chen · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.