Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Sim-trained ZAP robot policy hits 96.7% on real tasks

Original title: Pretraining Knows What, Simulation Teaches How: Compositional Generalization in a Sim-Trained Robot Agent

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Benjamin Pikus ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A 27B vision-language model fine-tuned only in simulation matches GPT-6 Astra and beats MolmoAct2's 33.3% in the same harness.

Zero-real Agent Policy (ZAP) uses a pretrained 27B vision-language model for scene understanding, then supervised fine-tuning and GRPO on simple simulated tasks to teach robot control through a tool harness. The authors report no real-world robot data during training, yet 96.7% success on real-world tasks, matching GPT-6 Astra while running 3x faster and 17x cheaper. They also report generalization to new objects, goals and language, plus transfer to an unseen single-arm Franka.

Unconfirmed: Success rates are the authors' measurements in their harness, not an independent evaluation.

Key facts
  • ZAP scores 55.9% on RoboLab-120, 4.9 points ahead of the leading VLA/WAM baseline.
  • Reported new behaviors include mid-air handoff, drawing an X and playing chess.
  • Those goals and manipulation types do not appear in the training data, the authors say.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

A robot policy needs to understand what a task is asking for in a scene, and how to move the robot to accomplish that task. To achieve these two skills, we introduce Zero-real Agent Policy (ZAP), a recipe that teaches a small off-the-shelf vision-language model to control a robot via a simple tool harness.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Benjamin Pikus · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.