BaRe-Mem: Bayesian Reliability Memory for Robust and Adaptive Agent Consultation
BaRe-Mem tracks advisor reliability so multi-agent systems resist misleading consultations better than debate or voting.
BaRe-Mem is an online Bayesian reliability memory for multi-agent consultation. It estimates advisor reliability from a central model's internal beliefs and updates those estimates from historical interactions, then uses them to weight advisor responses and to choose consultation versus autonomous reasoning. Across nine benchmarks and six central models, it is more robust to misleading advisors than debate and majority voting, and on harder tasks it stays above autonomous reasoning at every tested misleading level. Applied to worker allocation, it improves MuSiQue completion over routing by historical success counts and identifies capable workers earlier.
- Estimates advisor reliability from internal beliefs and past interactions.
- More robust than debate and majority voting under misleading advice.
- Stays above autonomous reasoning on harder tasks at all misleading levels.
- Improves MuSiQue worker allocation versus historical-success routing.
From the original article
1 min read at huggingface.coIn multi-agent systems, reliable consultation is challenging because advisor capabilities vary across tasks, and misleading information can make consultation worse than autonomous reasoning. We introduce BaRe-Mem, an online Bayesian reliability memory for multi-agent consultation.
By Peilin Feng, Zhengyang Huang, Soujanya Poria · huggingface.co
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.